引入人工智能对结肠镜检查的影响:对潜在利弊的回顾性研究。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Ayaka Takasu, Hirofumi Kogure, Zhehao Dai, Yuki Yamada, Masako Nakayama, Robert Bechara, Takuji Gotoda, Yoshimasa Miura
{"title":"引入人工智能对结肠镜检查的影响:对潜在利弊的回顾性研究。","authors":"Ayaka Takasu, Hirofumi Kogure, Zhehao Dai, Yuki Yamada, Masako Nakayama, Robert Bechara, Takuji Gotoda, Yoshimasa Miura","doi":"10.1111/jgh.17040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Computer-aided detection (CAD) can improve adenoma detection rates (ADRs); however, the impact of its introduction into real-world practice remains unclear. This study investigated the effect of CAD's introduction on colonoscopy in a hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 1314 patients who underwent colonoscopy between January and December 2023 at a single facility where CAD was introduced in three of four endoscopy rooms. ADR, polyp detection rate (PDR), and sessile serrated lesion detection rate (SSLDR) were first compared between patients who underwent colonoscopy without CAD before introduction to the facility (pre-intervention non-CAD group) and those who underwent colonoscopy with CAD after introduction (CAD group). Subsequently, cases without CAD were analyzed to evaluate endoscopists' performance by comparing the detection rates between the pre-intervention non-CAD group and patients who underwent colonoscopy without CAD after introduction (post-intervention non-CAD group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ADR (49.3% vs. 31.6%, p < 0.001) and PDR (57.9% vs. 39.8%, p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the CAD group than in the pre-intervention non-CAD group; SSLDR (4.4% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.14) was comparable between groups. ADR (31.6% vs. 13.5%, p < 0.001) and PDR (39.8% vs. 18.2%, p < 0.001) were significantly lower in the post-intervention non-CAD group than in the pre-intervention non-CAD group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The introduction of CAD-assisted colonoscopy significantly improved ADR and PDR. However, CAD reliance may lead to lapses in attention toward independent lesion detection by endoscopists. It is essential to consider how CAD should be utilized in clinical practice to maximize its benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Introducing Artificial Intelligence on Colonoscopy: A Retrospective Study on Potential Benefits and Drawbacks.\",\"authors\":\"Ayaka Takasu, Hirofumi Kogure, Zhehao Dai, Yuki Yamada, Masako Nakayama, Robert Bechara, Takuji Gotoda, Yoshimasa Miura\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jgh.17040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Computer-aided detection (CAD) can improve adenoma detection rates (ADRs); however, the impact of its introduction into real-world practice remains unclear. This study investigated the effect of CAD's introduction on colonoscopy in a hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 1314 patients who underwent colonoscopy between January and December 2023 at a single facility where CAD was introduced in three of four endoscopy rooms. ADR, polyp detection rate (PDR), and sessile serrated lesion detection rate (SSLDR) were first compared between patients who underwent colonoscopy without CAD before introduction to the facility (pre-intervention non-CAD group) and those who underwent colonoscopy with CAD after introduction (CAD group). Subsequently, cases without CAD were analyzed to evaluate endoscopists' performance by comparing the detection rates between the pre-intervention non-CAD group and patients who underwent colonoscopy without CAD after introduction (post-intervention non-CAD group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ADR (49.3% vs. 31.6%, p < 0.001) and PDR (57.9% vs. 39.8%, p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the CAD group than in the pre-intervention non-CAD group; SSLDR (4.4% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.14) was comparable between groups. ADR (31.6% vs. 13.5%, p < 0.001) and PDR (39.8% vs. 18.2%, p < 0.001) were significantly lower in the post-intervention non-CAD group than in the pre-intervention non-CAD group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The introduction of CAD-assisted colonoscopy significantly improved ADR and PDR. However, CAD reliance may lead to lapses in attention toward independent lesion detection by endoscopists. It is essential to consider how CAD should be utilized in clinical practice to maximize its benefits.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.17040\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.17040","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:计算机辅助检测(CAD)可以提高腺瘤的检出率;然而,将其引入现实实践的影响尚不清楚。本研究探讨了某医院引入CAD对结肠镜检查的影响。方法:这项回顾性研究包括1314名患者,他们于2023年1月至12月在一家医院接受结肠镜检查,其中四个内镜室中的三个引入了CAD。首先比较入院前无CAD的结肠镜检查患者(干预前无CAD组)和入院后有CAD的结肠镜检查患者(CAD组)的不良反应、息肉检出率(PDR)和无根锯齿状病变检出率(SSLDR)。随后,对无CAD的病例进行分析,通过比较干预前非CAD组和引入后无CAD的结肠镜检查患者(干预后非CAD组)的检出率来评估内窥镜医师的表现。结果:ADR (49.3% vs. 31.6%, p)结论:cad辅助结肠镜检查的引入显著改善了ADR和PDR。然而,对CAD的依赖可能导致内窥镜医师对独立病变检测的注意力缺失。必须考虑如何在临床实践中利用CAD以最大限度地发挥其效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Introducing Artificial Intelligence on Colonoscopy: A Retrospective Study on Potential Benefits and Drawbacks.

Background and aim: Computer-aided detection (CAD) can improve adenoma detection rates (ADRs); however, the impact of its introduction into real-world practice remains unclear. This study investigated the effect of CAD's introduction on colonoscopy in a hospital.

Methods: This retrospective study included 1314 patients who underwent colonoscopy between January and December 2023 at a single facility where CAD was introduced in three of four endoscopy rooms. ADR, polyp detection rate (PDR), and sessile serrated lesion detection rate (SSLDR) were first compared between patients who underwent colonoscopy without CAD before introduction to the facility (pre-intervention non-CAD group) and those who underwent colonoscopy with CAD after introduction (CAD group). Subsequently, cases without CAD were analyzed to evaluate endoscopists' performance by comparing the detection rates between the pre-intervention non-CAD group and patients who underwent colonoscopy without CAD after introduction (post-intervention non-CAD group).

Results: ADR (49.3% vs. 31.6%, p < 0.001) and PDR (57.9% vs. 39.8%, p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the CAD group than in the pre-intervention non-CAD group; SSLDR (4.4% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.14) was comparable between groups. ADR (31.6% vs. 13.5%, p < 0.001) and PDR (39.8% vs. 18.2%, p < 0.001) were significantly lower in the post-intervention non-CAD group than in the pre-intervention non-CAD group.

Conclusions: The introduction of CAD-assisted colonoscopy significantly improved ADR and PDR. However, CAD reliance may lead to lapses in attention toward independent lesion detection by endoscopists. It is essential to consider how CAD should be utilized in clinical practice to maximize its benefits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
326
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is produced 12 times per year and publishes peer-reviewed original papers, reviews and editorials concerned with clinical practice and research in the fields of hepatology, gastroenterology and endoscopy. Papers cover the medical, radiological, pathological, biochemical, physiological and historical aspects of the subject areas. All submitted papers are reviewed by at least two referees expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信