Durvalumab联合卡铂/紫杉醇,然后Durvalumab联合或不联合奥拉帕尼作为新诊断的晚期或复发子宫内膜癌的一线治疗:来自III期DUO-E试验的日本亚组。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Shin Nishio, Tadaaki Nishikawa, Masahiko Mori, Shoji Kamiura, Toshiyuki Sumi, Mayu Yunokawa, Yuichi Imai, Eiji Kondo, Kazuhiro Takehara, Hirokuni Takano, Wataru Kudaka, Nobuhiro Kado, Wataru Yamagami, Hidenori Kato, Koji Nishino, Tomoka Usami, Junzo Hamanishi, Masahiro Nii, Itsumi Takaya, Aikou Okamoto
{"title":"Durvalumab联合卡铂/紫杉醇,然后Durvalumab联合或不联合奥拉帕尼作为新诊断的晚期或复发子宫内膜癌的一线治疗:来自III期DUO-E试验的日本亚组。","authors":"Shin Nishio, Tadaaki Nishikawa, Masahiko Mori, Shoji Kamiura, Toshiyuki Sumi, Mayu Yunokawa, Yuichi Imai, Eiji Kondo, Kazuhiro Takehara, Hirokuni Takano, Wataru Kudaka, Nobuhiro Kado, Wataru Yamagami, Hidenori Kato, Koji Nishino, Tomoka Usami, Junzo Hamanishi, Masahiro Nii, Itsumi Takaya, Aikou Okamoto","doi":"10.3802/jgo.2025.36.e118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>DUO-E/GOG-3041/ENGOT-EN10 (NCT04269200) demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful progression-free survival (PFS) improvement with durvalumab plus carboplatin/paclitaxel, followed by durvalumab with or without olaparib, vs. carboplatin/paclitaxel alone (intention-to-treat [ITT] population) in patients with newly diagnosed advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. We evaluated efficacy and safety in the Japan subset of DUO-E.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with newly diagnosed International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III/IV or recurrent endometrial cancer were randomized 1:1:1 to control arm (carboplatin/paclitaxel + durvalumab placebo [6 cycles] followed by durvalumab placebo + olaparib placebo), durvalumab arm (carboplatin/paclitaxel + durvalumab [1,120 mg every 3 weeks] [6 cycles] followed by durvalumab [1,500 mg every 4 weeks] + olaparib placebo), or durvalumab + olaparib arm (carboplatin/paclitaxel + durvalumab [6 cycles] followed by durvalumab + olaparib [300 mg twice a day]). Dual primary endpoints were investigator-assessed PFS for durvalumab and durvalumab + olaparib arms vs. control. This prespecified exploratory analysis evaluated PFS and safety in the Japan subset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the Japan subset (n=88) PFS favored durvalumab (hazard ratio=0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.32-1.12) and durvalumab + olaparib (0.44, 95% CI=0.22-0.85) vs. control; median PFS was 9.9 and 15.1 vs. 9.5 months, and the 18-month PFS rate was 37.0% and 42.1% vs. 22.2%, respectively. The safety profile in the Japan subset was generally consistent with the full safety analysis set and the established profiles of the individual agents.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Efficacy and safety in the Japan subset were generally consistent with outcomes in the DUO-E ITT population. This Japanese subset analysis of DUO-E supports carboplatin/paclitaxel + durvalumab followed by durvalumab with or without olaparib as new treatment options in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer and is the first to report on these regimens in Japanese patients alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":15868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gynecologic Oncology","volume":"36 4","pages":"e118"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12226317/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Durvalumab plus carboplatin/paclitaxel followed by durvalumab with or without olaparib as first-line treatment for newly diagnosed advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: Japan subset from the phase III DUO-E trial.\",\"authors\":\"Shin Nishio, Tadaaki Nishikawa, Masahiko Mori, Shoji Kamiura, Toshiyuki Sumi, Mayu Yunokawa, Yuichi Imai, Eiji Kondo, Kazuhiro Takehara, Hirokuni Takano, Wataru Kudaka, Nobuhiro Kado, Wataru Yamagami, Hidenori Kato, Koji Nishino, Tomoka Usami, Junzo Hamanishi, Masahiro Nii, Itsumi Takaya, Aikou Okamoto\",\"doi\":\"10.3802/jgo.2025.36.e118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>DUO-E/GOG-3041/ENGOT-EN10 (NCT04269200) demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful progression-free survival (PFS) improvement with durvalumab plus carboplatin/paclitaxel, followed by durvalumab with or without olaparib, vs. carboplatin/paclitaxel alone (intention-to-treat [ITT] population) in patients with newly diagnosed advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. We evaluated efficacy and safety in the Japan subset of DUO-E.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with newly diagnosed International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III/IV or recurrent endometrial cancer were randomized 1:1:1 to control arm (carboplatin/paclitaxel + durvalumab placebo [6 cycles] followed by durvalumab placebo + olaparib placebo), durvalumab arm (carboplatin/paclitaxel + durvalumab [1,120 mg every 3 weeks] [6 cycles] followed by durvalumab [1,500 mg every 4 weeks] + olaparib placebo), or durvalumab + olaparib arm (carboplatin/paclitaxel + durvalumab [6 cycles] followed by durvalumab + olaparib [300 mg twice a day]). Dual primary endpoints were investigator-assessed PFS for durvalumab and durvalumab + olaparib arms vs. control. This prespecified exploratory analysis evaluated PFS and safety in the Japan subset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the Japan subset (n=88) PFS favored durvalumab (hazard ratio=0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.32-1.12) and durvalumab + olaparib (0.44, 95% CI=0.22-0.85) vs. control; median PFS was 9.9 and 15.1 vs. 9.5 months, and the 18-month PFS rate was 37.0% and 42.1% vs. 22.2%, respectively. The safety profile in the Japan subset was generally consistent with the full safety analysis set and the established profiles of the individual agents.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Efficacy and safety in the Japan subset were generally consistent with outcomes in the DUO-E ITT population. This Japanese subset analysis of DUO-E supports carboplatin/paclitaxel + durvalumab followed by durvalumab with or without olaparib as new treatment options in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer and is the first to report on these regimens in Japanese patients alone.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Gynecologic Oncology\",\"volume\":\"36 4\",\"pages\":\"e118\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12226317/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Gynecologic Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2025.36.e118\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gynecologic Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2025.36.e118","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:DUO-E/GOG-3041/ENGOT-EN10 (NCT04269200)显示,在新诊断的晚期或复发子宫内膜癌患者中,杜伐单抗联合卡铂/紫杉醇,随后杜伐单抗联合或不联合奥拉帕尼,与单卡铂/紫杉醇(意向治疗[ITT]人群)相比,无进展生存期(PFS)改善具有统计学意义和临床意义。我们评估了DUO-E在日本亚组的疗效和安全性。方法:新诊断的国际妇产联合会III/IV期或复发性子宫内膜癌患者按1:1:1随机分为对照组(卡铂/紫杉醇+ durvalumab安慰剂[6个周期],随后是durvalumab安慰剂+奥拉帕尼安慰剂)、durvalumab组(卡铂/紫杉醇+ durvalumab [1120 mg / 3周][6个周期],随后是durvalumab [1500 mg / 4周]+奥拉帕尼安慰剂)、或durvalumab + olaparib组(卡铂/紫杉醇+ durvalumab[6个周期],随后是durvalumab + olaparib [300 mg,每日2次])。双主要终点是研究者评估的durvalumab组和durvalumab + olaparib组与对照组的PFS。这项预先指定的探索性分析评估了日本亚组的PFS和安全性。结果:在日本亚组(n=88)中,PFS倾向于durvalumab(风险比=0.61,95%可信区间[CI]=0.32-1.12)和durvalumab + olaparib (0.44, 95% CI=0.22-0.85)。中位PFS分别为9.9和15.1个月和9.5个月,18个月PFS率分别为37.0%和42.1%和22.2%。日本子集的安全性概况总体上与完整的安全性分析集和单个药物的既定概况一致。结论:日本亚组的疗效和安全性与DUO-E ITT人群的结果基本一致。这项日本的DUO-E亚组分析支持卡铂/紫杉醇+杜伐单抗,然后杜伐单抗加或不加奥拉帕尼作为晚期或复发性子宫内膜癌患者的新治疗选择,并且是首次单独在日本患者中报道这些方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Durvalumab plus carboplatin/paclitaxel followed by durvalumab with or without olaparib as first-line treatment for newly diagnosed advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: Japan subset from the phase III DUO-E trial.

Durvalumab plus carboplatin/paclitaxel followed by durvalumab with or without olaparib as first-line treatment for newly diagnosed advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: Japan subset from the phase III DUO-E trial.

Durvalumab plus carboplatin/paclitaxel followed by durvalumab with or without olaparib as first-line treatment for newly diagnosed advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: Japan subset from the phase III DUO-E trial.

Durvalumab plus carboplatin/paclitaxel followed by durvalumab with or without olaparib as first-line treatment for newly diagnosed advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: Japan subset from the phase III DUO-E trial.

Objective: DUO-E/GOG-3041/ENGOT-EN10 (NCT04269200) demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful progression-free survival (PFS) improvement with durvalumab plus carboplatin/paclitaxel, followed by durvalumab with or without olaparib, vs. carboplatin/paclitaxel alone (intention-to-treat [ITT] population) in patients with newly diagnosed advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. We evaluated efficacy and safety in the Japan subset of DUO-E.

Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III/IV or recurrent endometrial cancer were randomized 1:1:1 to control arm (carboplatin/paclitaxel + durvalumab placebo [6 cycles] followed by durvalumab placebo + olaparib placebo), durvalumab arm (carboplatin/paclitaxel + durvalumab [1,120 mg every 3 weeks] [6 cycles] followed by durvalumab [1,500 mg every 4 weeks] + olaparib placebo), or durvalumab + olaparib arm (carboplatin/paclitaxel + durvalumab [6 cycles] followed by durvalumab + olaparib [300 mg twice a day]). Dual primary endpoints were investigator-assessed PFS for durvalumab and durvalumab + olaparib arms vs. control. This prespecified exploratory analysis evaluated PFS and safety in the Japan subset.

Results: In the Japan subset (n=88) PFS favored durvalumab (hazard ratio=0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.32-1.12) and durvalumab + olaparib (0.44, 95% CI=0.22-0.85) vs. control; median PFS was 9.9 and 15.1 vs. 9.5 months, and the 18-month PFS rate was 37.0% and 42.1% vs. 22.2%, respectively. The safety profile in the Japan subset was generally consistent with the full safety analysis set and the established profiles of the individual agents.

Conclusion: Efficacy and safety in the Japan subset were generally consistent with outcomes in the DUO-E ITT population. This Japanese subset analysis of DUO-E supports carboplatin/paclitaxel + durvalumab followed by durvalumab with or without olaparib as new treatment options in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer and is the first to report on these regimens in Japanese patients alone.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology ONCOLOGY-OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
84
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gynecologic Oncology (JGO) is an official publication of the Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology. Abbreviated title is ''J Gynecol Oncol''. It was launched in 1990. The JGO''s aim is to publish the highest quality manuscripts dedicated to the advancement of care of the patients with gynecologic cancer. It is an international peer-reviewed periodical journal that is published bimonthly (January, March, May, July, September, and November). Supplement numbers are at times published. The journal publishes editorials, original and review articles, correspondence, book review, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信