脓毒症患者肺血管阻力升高的患病率及预后意义。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Hongmin Zhang, Beijun Gao, Ye Liu, Xiaoting Wang, Qing Zhang
{"title":"脓毒症患者肺血管阻力升高的患病率及预后意义。","authors":"Hongmin Zhang, Beijun Gao, Ye Liu, Xiaoting Wang, Qing Zhang","doi":"10.1053/j.jvca.2025.06.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) elevation is a critical factor contributing to acute right ventricular (RV) dysfunction. This study was designed to investigate the prevalence and prognostic significance of this condition in septic patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A tertiary hospital intensive care unit.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 638 septic patients.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Hemodynamic, echocardiographic, and prognostic data were collected. PVR was estimated using tricuspid regurgitation and RV outflow tract velocity-time integral. A PVR value exceeding 2.0 Wood units (WU) was considered abnormal. RV systolic dysfunction (RVSD) was determined by tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, fractional area change, or RV S' velocity. Patients were categorized into four groups: (1) normal RV function (n = 205); (2) isolated RVSD (n = 76); (3) isolated PVR elevation (n = 195), and (4) RVSD + PVR elevation (n = 162). Cox regression analysis revealed that the presence of combined RVSD and PVR elevation was independently associated with 30-day mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.907, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.385-6.100, p = 0.005). Conversely, neither isolated RVSD nor isolated PVR elevation was significantly associated with 30-day mortality (HR: 0.617, 95% CI: 0.168-2.274, p = 0.468; HR: 1.074, 95% CI: 0.469-2.461, p = 0.865, respectively). Subgroup analysis revealed that, compared with PVR ≤2.0 WU, PVR >2.0 WU was associated with 30-day mortality in patients with RVSD (HR: 3.878, 95% CI: 1.139-13.203, p = 0.030), but not in those with normal RV systolic function (HR: 1.632, 95% CI: 0.793-3.358, p = 0.183).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In septic patients, the combination of elevated PVR and RVSD was an independent predictor of 30-day mortality. However, neither PVR elevation nor RVSD alone was significantly associated with 30-day mortality. Further studies are warranted to elucidate the complex interplay between these factors in septic patients and explore potential therapeutic interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":15176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Prevalence and Prognostic Implications of Elevated Pulmonary Vascular Resistance in Septic Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Hongmin Zhang, Beijun Gao, Ye Liu, Xiaoting Wang, Qing Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.jvca.2025.06.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) elevation is a critical factor contributing to acute right ventricular (RV) dysfunction. This study was designed to investigate the prevalence and prognostic significance of this condition in septic patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A tertiary hospital intensive care unit.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 638 septic patients.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Hemodynamic, echocardiographic, and prognostic data were collected. PVR was estimated using tricuspid regurgitation and RV outflow tract velocity-time integral. A PVR value exceeding 2.0 Wood units (WU) was considered abnormal. RV systolic dysfunction (RVSD) was determined by tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, fractional area change, or RV S' velocity. Patients were categorized into four groups: (1) normal RV function (n = 205); (2) isolated RVSD (n = 76); (3) isolated PVR elevation (n = 195), and (4) RVSD + PVR elevation (n = 162). Cox regression analysis revealed that the presence of combined RVSD and PVR elevation was independently associated with 30-day mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.907, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.385-6.100, p = 0.005). Conversely, neither isolated RVSD nor isolated PVR elevation was significantly associated with 30-day mortality (HR: 0.617, 95% CI: 0.168-2.274, p = 0.468; HR: 1.074, 95% CI: 0.469-2.461, p = 0.865, respectively). Subgroup analysis revealed that, compared with PVR ≤2.0 WU, PVR >2.0 WU was associated with 30-day mortality in patients with RVSD (HR: 3.878, 95% CI: 1.139-13.203, p = 0.030), but not in those with normal RV systolic function (HR: 1.632, 95% CI: 0.793-3.358, p = 0.183).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In septic patients, the combination of elevated PVR and RVSD was an independent predictor of 30-day mortality. However, neither PVR elevation nor RVSD alone was significantly associated with 30-day mortality. Further studies are warranted to elucidate the complex interplay between these factors in septic patients and explore potential therapeutic interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2025.06.012\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2025.06.012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:肺血管阻力(PVR)升高是导致急性右心室功能障碍的重要因素。本研究旨在探讨这种情况在脓毒症患者中的患病率和预后意义。设计:观察性研究。环境:三级医院重症监护室。研究对象:638例脓毒症患者。干预:没有。测量和主要结果:收集血流动力学、超声心动图和预后数据。使用三尖瓣反流和右心室流出道速度-时间积分来估计PVR。PVR值超过2.0木单位(WU)被认为是异常。右心室收缩功能障碍(RVSD)通过三尖瓣环形平面收缩偏移、分数面积变化或右心室S速度来确定。患者分为四组:(1)右心室功能正常(n = 205);(2)离体RVSD (n = 76);(3)孤立PVR升高(n = 195), (4) RVSD + PVR升高(n = 162)。Cox回归分析显示,RVSD和PVR联合升高与30天死亡率独立相关(风险比[HR]: 2.907, 95%可信区间[CI]: 1.385-6.100, p = 0.005)。相反,孤立的RVSD和PVR升高与30天死亡率均无显著相关性(HR: 0.617, 95% CI: 0.168-2.274, p = 0.468;HR: 1.074, 95% CI: 0.469-2.461, p = 0.865)。亚组分析显示,与PVR≤2.0 WU的患者相比,PVR >2.0 WU与RVSD患者30天死亡率相关(HR: 3.878, 95% CI: 1.139-13.203, p = 0.030),但与RVSD收缩功能正常的患者无关(HR: 1.632, 95% CI: 0.793-3.358, p = 0.183)。结论:在脓毒症患者中,PVR和RVSD升高是30天死亡率的独立预测因子。然而,PVR升高和RVSD单独与30天死亡率均无显著相关性。需要进一步的研究来阐明这些因素在脓毒症患者中的复杂相互作用,并探索潜在的治疗干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Prevalence and Prognostic Implications of Elevated Pulmonary Vascular Resistance in Septic Patients.

Objective: Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) elevation is a critical factor contributing to acute right ventricular (RV) dysfunction. This study was designed to investigate the prevalence and prognostic significance of this condition in septic patients.

Design: An observational study.

Setting: A tertiary hospital intensive care unit.

Participants: A total of 638 septic patients.

Intervention: None.

Measurements and main results: Hemodynamic, echocardiographic, and prognostic data were collected. PVR was estimated using tricuspid regurgitation and RV outflow tract velocity-time integral. A PVR value exceeding 2.0 Wood units (WU) was considered abnormal. RV systolic dysfunction (RVSD) was determined by tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, fractional area change, or RV S' velocity. Patients were categorized into four groups: (1) normal RV function (n = 205); (2) isolated RVSD (n = 76); (3) isolated PVR elevation (n = 195), and (4) RVSD + PVR elevation (n = 162). Cox regression analysis revealed that the presence of combined RVSD and PVR elevation was independently associated with 30-day mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.907, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.385-6.100, p = 0.005). Conversely, neither isolated RVSD nor isolated PVR elevation was significantly associated with 30-day mortality (HR: 0.617, 95% CI: 0.168-2.274, p = 0.468; HR: 1.074, 95% CI: 0.469-2.461, p = 0.865, respectively). Subgroup analysis revealed that, compared with PVR ≤2.0 WU, PVR >2.0 WU was associated with 30-day mortality in patients with RVSD (HR: 3.878, 95% CI: 1.139-13.203, p = 0.030), but not in those with normal RV systolic function (HR: 1.632, 95% CI: 0.793-3.358, p = 0.183).

Conclusions: In septic patients, the combination of elevated PVR and RVSD was an independent predictor of 30-day mortality. However, neither PVR elevation nor RVSD alone was significantly associated with 30-day mortality. Further studies are warranted to elucidate the complex interplay between these factors in septic patients and explore potential therapeutic interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
17.90%
发文量
606
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia is primarily aimed at anesthesiologists who deal with patients undergoing cardiac, thoracic or vascular surgical procedures. JCVA features a multidisciplinary approach, with contributions from cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgeons, cardiologists, and other related specialists. Emphasis is placed on rapid publication of clinically relevant material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信