利用机器学习和传统回归方法将EORTC QLQ-C30和QLQ-LC13与肺癌患者的SF-6D效用指数进行映射。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Longlin Jiang, Kexun Li, Simiao Lu, Zhou Hong, Yifang Wang, Qin Xie, Qin He, Sirui Wei, Aoru Zhou, Hong Kang, Xuefeng Leng, Qing Yang, Yan Miao
{"title":"利用机器学习和传统回归方法将EORTC QLQ-C30和QLQ-LC13与肺癌患者的SF-6D效用指数进行映射。","authors":"Longlin Jiang, Kexun Li, Simiao Lu, Zhou Hong, Yifang Wang, Qin Xie, Qin He, Sirui Wei, Aoru Zhou, Hong Kang, Xuefeng Leng, Qing Yang, Yan Miao","doi":"10.1186/s12955-025-02394-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preference-based measures of health-related quality of life (HRQoL), such as the Short Form Six-Dimension (SF-6D) is essential for health economic evaluations. However, these measures are rarely included in clinical trials for lung cancer. This study aims to develop mapping algorithms to predict SF-6D health utility scores from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core (EORTC QLQ-C30) and Quality of Life Questionnaire-Lung Cancer 13 (QLQ-LC13).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study sample comprised a Chinese population with lung cancer (n = 625). Traditional regression techniques, including Ordinary Least Squares regression, Generalized Linear Model, as well as machine learning techniques, such as Gradient Boosting Tree, Support Vector Regression, Ridge Regression are used. Five-fold cross-validation was performed. The performance metrics used to evaluate the models including R<sup>2</sup>, root mean square error (RMSE),mean absolute error (MAE) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) were used to screen the optimal model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean and median of SF-6D health utility values were 0.774 (SD = 0.154) and 7.795, respectively. The model with the best mapping performance was the Ridge regression model Five-fold cross-validation (CV) results show that the Ridge regression model has the best mapping performance, the final prediction indexes are R<sup>2</sup> = 0.753, RMSE = 0.074, MAE = 0.057, MAPE = 8.169%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study developed an optimized mapping algorithm to predict the utility index from the QLQ-C30 QLQ-LC13 to the SF-6D. This algorithm offers provides an effective alternative for estimating SF-6D estimation when the preference-based health utility values are unavailable.</p>","PeriodicalId":12980,"journal":{"name":"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes","volume":"23 1","pages":"66"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12220268/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mapping the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13 to the SF-6D utility index in patients with lung cancer using machine learning and traditional regression methods.\",\"authors\":\"Longlin Jiang, Kexun Li, Simiao Lu, Zhou Hong, Yifang Wang, Qin Xie, Qin He, Sirui Wei, Aoru Zhou, Hong Kang, Xuefeng Leng, Qing Yang, Yan Miao\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12955-025-02394-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preference-based measures of health-related quality of life (HRQoL), such as the Short Form Six-Dimension (SF-6D) is essential for health economic evaluations. However, these measures are rarely included in clinical trials for lung cancer. This study aims to develop mapping algorithms to predict SF-6D health utility scores from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core (EORTC QLQ-C30) and Quality of Life Questionnaire-Lung Cancer 13 (QLQ-LC13).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study sample comprised a Chinese population with lung cancer (n = 625). Traditional regression techniques, including Ordinary Least Squares regression, Generalized Linear Model, as well as machine learning techniques, such as Gradient Boosting Tree, Support Vector Regression, Ridge Regression are used. Five-fold cross-validation was performed. The performance metrics used to evaluate the models including R<sup>2</sup>, root mean square error (RMSE),mean absolute error (MAE) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) were used to screen the optimal model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean and median of SF-6D health utility values were 0.774 (SD = 0.154) and 7.795, respectively. The model with the best mapping performance was the Ridge regression model Five-fold cross-validation (CV) results show that the Ridge regression model has the best mapping performance, the final prediction indexes are R<sup>2</sup> = 0.753, RMSE = 0.074, MAE = 0.057, MAPE = 8.169%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study developed an optimized mapping algorithm to predict the utility index from the QLQ-C30 QLQ-LC13 to the SF-6D. This algorithm offers provides an effective alternative for estimating SF-6D estimation when the preference-based health utility values are unavailable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12980,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"66\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12220268/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-025-02394-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-025-02394-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:基于偏好的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)测量方法,如短形式六维(SF-6D)对健康经济评价至关重要。然而,这些措施很少包括在肺癌的临床试验中。本研究旨在开发映射算法来预测欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷核心(EORTC QLQ-C30)和生活质量问卷-肺癌13 (QLQ-LC13)的SF-6D健康效用评分。方法:研究样本为中国肺癌患者(n = 625)。传统的回归技术,包括普通最小二乘回归,广义线性模型,以及机器学习技术,如梯度增强树,支持向量回归,岭回归。进行五重交叉验证。评估模型的性能指标包括R2、均方根误差(RMSE)、平均绝对误差(MAE)和平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)来筛选最优模型。结果:SF-6D健康效用值均值为0.774 (SD = 0.154),中位数为7.795。五重交叉验证(CV)结果表明,Ridge回归模型具有最佳的映射性能,最终预测指标为R2 = 0.753, RMSE = 0.074, MAE = 0.057, MAPE = 8.169%。结论:本研究开发了一种优化的映射算法来预测从QLQ-C30到QLQ-LC13到SF-6D的效用指数。当基于偏好的健康效用值不可用时,该算法为估计SF-6D提供了一种有效的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mapping the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13 to the SF-6D utility index in patients with lung cancer using machine learning and traditional regression methods.

Background: Preference-based measures of health-related quality of life (HRQoL), such as the Short Form Six-Dimension (SF-6D) is essential for health economic evaluations. However, these measures are rarely included in clinical trials for lung cancer. This study aims to develop mapping algorithms to predict SF-6D health utility scores from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core (EORTC QLQ-C30) and Quality of Life Questionnaire-Lung Cancer 13 (QLQ-LC13).

Method: The study sample comprised a Chinese population with lung cancer (n = 625). Traditional regression techniques, including Ordinary Least Squares regression, Generalized Linear Model, as well as machine learning techniques, such as Gradient Boosting Tree, Support Vector Regression, Ridge Regression are used. Five-fold cross-validation was performed. The performance metrics used to evaluate the models including R2, root mean square error (RMSE),mean absolute error (MAE) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) were used to screen the optimal model.

Results: The mean and median of SF-6D health utility values were 0.774 (SD = 0.154) and 7.795, respectively. The model with the best mapping performance was the Ridge regression model Five-fold cross-validation (CV) results show that the Ridge regression model has the best mapping performance, the final prediction indexes are R2 = 0.753, RMSE = 0.074, MAE = 0.057, MAPE = 8.169%.

Conclusions: This study developed an optimized mapping algorithm to predict the utility index from the QLQ-C30 QLQ-LC13 to the SF-6D. This algorithm offers provides an effective alternative for estimating SF-6D estimation when the preference-based health utility values are unavailable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.80%
发文量
154
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes is an open access, peer-reviewed, journal offering high quality articles, rapid publication and wide diffusion in the public domain. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes considers original manuscripts on the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) assessment for evaluation of medical and psychosocial interventions. It also considers approaches and studies on psychometric properties of HRQOL and patient reported outcome measures, including cultural validation of instruments if they provide information about the impact of interventions. The journal publishes study protocols and reviews summarising the present state of knowledge concerning a particular aspect of HRQOL and patient reported outcome measures. Reviews should generally follow systematic review methodology. Comments on articles and letters to the editor are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信