宽视场OCTA量化外周非灌注区预测亚临床新生血管的风险。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Eye Pub Date : 2025-07-02 DOI:10.1038/s41433-025-03891-2
An-Lun Wu, Yukun Guo, Tristan T Hormel, Christina J Flaxel, Merina Thomas, Steven T Bailey, Dong-Wouk Park, Yali Jia, Thomas S Hwang
{"title":"宽视场OCTA量化外周非灌注区预测亚临床新生血管的风险。","authors":"An-Lun Wu, Yukun Guo, Tristan T Hormel, Christina J Flaxel, Merina Thomas, Steven T Bailey, Dong-Wouk Park, Yali Jia, Thomas S Hwang","doi":"10.1038/s41433-025-03891-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To demonstrate the capabilities of single-shot widefield swept-source OCT angiography (SS-OCTA) in detecting subclinical retinal neovascularization (RNV), quantifying nonperfusion areas (NPAs), and exploring the relations between NPAs and subclinical RNV in eyes graded as nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eyes clinically graded as moderate to severe NPDR underwent SS-OCTA imaging. Expert graders identified subclinical RNV, defined as vessels with a flow signal above the internal limiting membrane on OCTA that are not visible on dilated fundus examination. This identification was based on a combination of en face OCT, en face OCTA, and cross-sectional OCTA overlaid on OCT. NPA index was calculated as a percentage of automatically quantified NPA over the area in the posterior pole, the mid-periphery, and the total imaged area.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Totally 37 eyes, including 21 had severe NPDR and 16 had moderate NPDR. Subclinical RNV was present in 14 eyes (37.8%). The eyes with RNV had significantly higher mid-peripheral and total NPA indices but not in the posterior region (mid-peripheral NPA: 31.97% ± 7.02% vs. 24.80% ± 6.60%, p = 0.041; total NPA: 27.96% ± 6.36% vs. 21.61% ± 5.65%, p = 0.046; all values are reported as mean ± standard deviation). The total NPA index showed the highest diagnostic accuracy for subclinical RNV detection (AUC: 0.761; 95% CI, 0.592-929, with a sensitivity of 64.3% and a specificity of 87% at a cutoff value of 28.84%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Widefield SS-OCTA can detect subclinical RNV. The eyes with higher mid-peripheral NPA indices are more likely to have subclinical RNV, indicating that the NPA index may be a useful biomarker for identifying eyes at risk of RNV.</p>","PeriodicalId":12125,"journal":{"name":"Eye","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wide-field OCTA quantified peripheral nonperfusion areas predict the risk of subclinical neovascularization.\",\"authors\":\"An-Lun Wu, Yukun Guo, Tristan T Hormel, Christina J Flaxel, Merina Thomas, Steven T Bailey, Dong-Wouk Park, Yali Jia, Thomas S Hwang\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41433-025-03891-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To demonstrate the capabilities of single-shot widefield swept-source OCT angiography (SS-OCTA) in detecting subclinical retinal neovascularization (RNV), quantifying nonperfusion areas (NPAs), and exploring the relations between NPAs and subclinical RNV in eyes graded as nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eyes clinically graded as moderate to severe NPDR underwent SS-OCTA imaging. Expert graders identified subclinical RNV, defined as vessels with a flow signal above the internal limiting membrane on OCTA that are not visible on dilated fundus examination. This identification was based on a combination of en face OCT, en face OCTA, and cross-sectional OCTA overlaid on OCT. NPA index was calculated as a percentage of automatically quantified NPA over the area in the posterior pole, the mid-periphery, and the total imaged area.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Totally 37 eyes, including 21 had severe NPDR and 16 had moderate NPDR. Subclinical RNV was present in 14 eyes (37.8%). The eyes with RNV had significantly higher mid-peripheral and total NPA indices but not in the posterior region (mid-peripheral NPA: 31.97% ± 7.02% vs. 24.80% ± 6.60%, p = 0.041; total NPA: 27.96% ± 6.36% vs. 21.61% ± 5.65%, p = 0.046; all values are reported as mean ± standard deviation). The total NPA index showed the highest diagnostic accuracy for subclinical RNV detection (AUC: 0.761; 95% CI, 0.592-929, with a sensitivity of 64.3% and a specificity of 87% at a cutoff value of 28.84%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Widefield SS-OCTA can detect subclinical RNV. The eyes with higher mid-peripheral NPA indices are more likely to have subclinical RNV, indicating that the NPA index may be a useful biomarker for identifying eyes at risk of RNV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eye\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eye\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-025-03891-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-025-03891-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨单次广角扫描源OCT血管造影(SS-OCTA)检测非临床视网膜新生血管(RNV)、定量非灌注区(NPAs)的能力,并探讨NPAs与非增散性糖尿病视网膜病变(NPDR)分级的亚临床视网膜新生血管(RNV)之间的关系。方法:对临床分级为中度至重度NPDR的眼睛行SS-OCTA成像。专家分级确定了亚临床RNV,定义为在OCTA上有血流信号高于内限制膜的血管,而在眼底扩张检查中看不到。这种识别是基于正面OCT、正面OCTA和覆盖在OCT上的横截面OCTA的组合。NPA指数计算为自动量化的NPA在后极、中外围和总成像面积上的百分比。结果:共37眼,其中重度NPDR 21眼,中度NPDR 16眼。亚临床RNV出现14只眼(37.8%)。RNV组的中外周NPA指数和总NPA指数均显著高于对照组,但后区无显著差异(中外周NPA: 31.97%±7.02% vs. 24.80%±6.60%,p = 0.041;总NPA: 27.96%±6.36%比21.61%±5.65%,p = 0.046;所有数值均以平均值±标准差报告)。总NPA指数对亚临床RNV检测的诊断准确率最高(AUC: 0.761;95% CI为0.592-929,敏感性为64.3%,特异性为87%(临界值为28.84%)。结论:宽视场SS-OCTA可检测亚临床RNV。中外周NPA指数较高的眼睛更有可能发生亚临床RNV,这表明NPA指数可能是识别RNV风险眼睛的有用生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Wide-field OCTA quantified peripheral nonperfusion areas predict the risk of subclinical neovascularization.

Purpose: To demonstrate the capabilities of single-shot widefield swept-source OCT angiography (SS-OCTA) in detecting subclinical retinal neovascularization (RNV), quantifying nonperfusion areas (NPAs), and exploring the relations between NPAs and subclinical RNV in eyes graded as nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR).

Methods: Eyes clinically graded as moderate to severe NPDR underwent SS-OCTA imaging. Expert graders identified subclinical RNV, defined as vessels with a flow signal above the internal limiting membrane on OCTA that are not visible on dilated fundus examination. This identification was based on a combination of en face OCT, en face OCTA, and cross-sectional OCTA overlaid on OCT. NPA index was calculated as a percentage of automatically quantified NPA over the area in the posterior pole, the mid-periphery, and the total imaged area.

Results: Totally 37 eyes, including 21 had severe NPDR and 16 had moderate NPDR. Subclinical RNV was present in 14 eyes (37.8%). The eyes with RNV had significantly higher mid-peripheral and total NPA indices but not in the posterior region (mid-peripheral NPA: 31.97% ± 7.02% vs. 24.80% ± 6.60%, p = 0.041; total NPA: 27.96% ± 6.36% vs. 21.61% ± 5.65%, p = 0.046; all values are reported as mean ± standard deviation). The total NPA index showed the highest diagnostic accuracy for subclinical RNV detection (AUC: 0.761; 95% CI, 0.592-929, with a sensitivity of 64.3% and a specificity of 87% at a cutoff value of 28.84%).

Conclusion: Widefield SS-OCTA can detect subclinical RNV. The eyes with higher mid-peripheral NPA indices are more likely to have subclinical RNV, indicating that the NPA index may be a useful biomarker for identifying eyes at risk of RNV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Eye
Eye 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
481
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Eye seeks to provide the international practising ophthalmologist with high quality articles, of academic rigour, on the latest global clinical and laboratory based research. Its core aim is to advance the science and practice of ophthalmology with the latest clinical- and scientific-based research. Whilst principally aimed at the practising clinician, the journal contains material of interest to a wider readership including optometrists, orthoptists, other health care professionals and research workers in all aspects of the field of visual science worldwide. Eye is the official journal of The Royal College of Ophthalmologists. Eye encourages the submission of original articles covering all aspects of ophthalmology including: external eye disease; oculo-plastic surgery; orbital and lacrimal disease; ocular surface and corneal disorders; paediatric ophthalmology and strabismus; glaucoma; medical and surgical retina; neuro-ophthalmology; cataract and refractive surgery; ocular oncology; ophthalmic pathology; ophthalmic genetics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信