共享手指预防任务中高级信息对共同表征的影响。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Melanie Y Lam, Daniel J Weeks, Romeo Chua
{"title":"共享手指预防任务中高级信息对共同表征的影响。","authors":"Melanie Y Lam, Daniel J Weeks, Romeo Chua","doi":"10.1007/s00221-025-07128-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Effective joint action relies on co-representation, where individuals integrate each other's tasks to achieve a shared task goal. This study examined how advanced information influences co-representation in a shared 4-choice finger precuing task where participants made discrete keypress responses to visual stimuli appearing at preassigned spatial locations. The five precue types varied in the amount of information about the upcoming stimulus location. In Experiment 1, participants first shared the 4-choice finger precuing task while sitting face-to-face (Joint 4-Choice, J4C), then they completed the entire 4-choice task alone (Solo 4-Choice, S4C). As anticipated, the standard precuing effect (reaction times [RTs] decrease as the amount of advanced information provided by the precue increases) was observed in the S4C task. However, a joint precuing effect was not elicited in the J4C task, suggesting that co-representation did not transpire. In Experiment 2, participants completed a modified solo version of the 4-choice finger precuing task (Solo 2-Choice, S2C), responding to only two of the four stimuli (Go trials) and ignoring the other two (NoGo trials). After completing the S2C task, participants completed the S4C task. The S2C task did not exhibit the standard precuing effect observed in the S4C task. Further analysis revealed that RTs were primarily influenced by the number of stimulus-response alternatives and modulated by the Go/NoGo context. Lastly, in Experiment 3, participants were seated side-by-side to enhance social context and verify that the spatial arrangement in Experiment 1 (face-to-face) did not inadvertently disrupt the social context needed to elicit co-representation. Despite eliminating this potential confounding factor by increasing proximity, no joint precuing effect was elicited. These findings advance our understanding of co-representation by demonstrating that it is not an automatic outcome of shared tasks and requires specific conditions (e.g., simultaneous actions, group-level representations) to manifest.</p>","PeriodicalId":12268,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Brain Research","volume":"243 7","pages":"183"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The influence of advanced information on co-representation in a shared finger precuing task.\",\"authors\":\"Melanie Y Lam, Daniel J Weeks, Romeo Chua\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00221-025-07128-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Effective joint action relies on co-representation, where individuals integrate each other's tasks to achieve a shared task goal. This study examined how advanced information influences co-representation in a shared 4-choice finger precuing task where participants made discrete keypress responses to visual stimuli appearing at preassigned spatial locations. The five precue types varied in the amount of information about the upcoming stimulus location. In Experiment 1, participants first shared the 4-choice finger precuing task while sitting face-to-face (Joint 4-Choice, J4C), then they completed the entire 4-choice task alone (Solo 4-Choice, S4C). As anticipated, the standard precuing effect (reaction times [RTs] decrease as the amount of advanced information provided by the precue increases) was observed in the S4C task. However, a joint precuing effect was not elicited in the J4C task, suggesting that co-representation did not transpire. In Experiment 2, participants completed a modified solo version of the 4-choice finger precuing task (Solo 2-Choice, S2C), responding to only two of the four stimuli (Go trials) and ignoring the other two (NoGo trials). After completing the S2C task, participants completed the S4C task. The S2C task did not exhibit the standard precuing effect observed in the S4C task. Further analysis revealed that RTs were primarily influenced by the number of stimulus-response alternatives and modulated by the Go/NoGo context. Lastly, in Experiment 3, participants were seated side-by-side to enhance social context and verify that the spatial arrangement in Experiment 1 (face-to-face) did not inadvertently disrupt the social context needed to elicit co-representation. Despite eliminating this potential confounding factor by increasing proximity, no joint precuing effect was elicited. These findings advance our understanding of co-representation by demonstrating that it is not an automatic outcome of shared tasks and requires specific conditions (e.g., simultaneous actions, group-level representations) to manifest.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental Brain Research\",\"volume\":\"243 7\",\"pages\":\"183\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental Brain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-025-07128-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-025-07128-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有效的联合行动依赖于共同代表,个体整合彼此的任务以实现共同的任务目标。本研究考察了高级信息如何影响共享四选项手指预判任务中的共同表征,在该任务中,参与者对出现在预先指定的空间位置的视觉刺激做出离散的按键反应。五种预提示类型对即将到来的刺激位置的信息量有所不同。在实验1中,参与者首先在面对面的情况下分享4个选择的手指预防任务(Joint 4-choice, J4C),然后他们单独完成整个4个选择的任务(Solo 4-choice, S4C)。正如预期的那样,在S4C任务中观察到标准预判效应(反应时间[RTs]随着预判提供的预判信息数量的增加而减少)。然而,在J4C任务中没有引起联合预防效应,这表明共同表征没有发生。在实验2中,参与者完成了一个修改后的单人版的四选手指预判任务(单人2选,S2C),只对四种刺激中的两种做出反应(围棋试验),而忽略了另外两种刺激(不围棋试验)。在完成S2C任务后,参与者完成S4C任务。S2C任务没有表现出在S4C任务中观察到的标准预防效应。进一步分析表明,RTs主要受刺激-反应选项数量的影响,并受Go/NoGo环境的调节。最后,在实验3中,参与者并排坐着以增强社会情境,并验证实验1(面对面)中的空间安排不会无意中破坏引起共同表征所需的社会情境。尽管通过增加接近度消除了这种潜在的混淆因素,但没有引起联合预防效果。这些发现通过证明它不是共享任务的自动结果,并且需要特定的条件(例如,同时的行动,群体层面的表征)来体现,从而促进了我们对共同表征的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The influence of advanced information on co-representation in a shared finger precuing task.

Effective joint action relies on co-representation, where individuals integrate each other's tasks to achieve a shared task goal. This study examined how advanced information influences co-representation in a shared 4-choice finger precuing task where participants made discrete keypress responses to visual stimuli appearing at preassigned spatial locations. The five precue types varied in the amount of information about the upcoming stimulus location. In Experiment 1, participants first shared the 4-choice finger precuing task while sitting face-to-face (Joint 4-Choice, J4C), then they completed the entire 4-choice task alone (Solo 4-Choice, S4C). As anticipated, the standard precuing effect (reaction times [RTs] decrease as the amount of advanced information provided by the precue increases) was observed in the S4C task. However, a joint precuing effect was not elicited in the J4C task, suggesting that co-representation did not transpire. In Experiment 2, participants completed a modified solo version of the 4-choice finger precuing task (Solo 2-Choice, S2C), responding to only two of the four stimuli (Go trials) and ignoring the other two (NoGo trials). After completing the S2C task, participants completed the S4C task. The S2C task did not exhibit the standard precuing effect observed in the S4C task. Further analysis revealed that RTs were primarily influenced by the number of stimulus-response alternatives and modulated by the Go/NoGo context. Lastly, in Experiment 3, participants were seated side-by-side to enhance social context and verify that the spatial arrangement in Experiment 1 (face-to-face) did not inadvertently disrupt the social context needed to elicit co-representation. Despite eliminating this potential confounding factor by increasing proximity, no joint precuing effect was elicited. These findings advance our understanding of co-representation by demonstrating that it is not an automatic outcome of shared tasks and requires specific conditions (e.g., simultaneous actions, group-level representations) to manifest.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
228
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1966, Experimental Brain Research publishes original contributions on many aspects of experimental research of the central and peripheral nervous system. The focus is on molecular, physiology, behavior, neurochemistry, developmental, cellular and molecular neurobiology, and experimental pathology relevant to general problems of cerebral function. The journal publishes original papers, reviews, and mini-reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信