加强精神保健:面向问题、资源和目标的多维框架(PRoGO)。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Stefan Leucht, Bernhard König, Antonio di Francesco, Alessandro Rodolico, Josef Priller, Kerem Böge, Wolfgang Strube, Jochen Gensichen, Peter Bechmann, Amr ElDeeb, Alkomiet Hasan, Steffen Moritz, Markus Jäger, Claudia Leucht, Jim van Os, John M Davis
{"title":"加强精神保健:面向问题、资源和目标的多维框架(PRoGO)。","authors":"Stefan Leucht, Bernhard König, Antonio di Francesco, Alessandro Rodolico, Josef Priller, Kerem Böge, Wolfgang Strube, Jochen Gensichen, Peter Bechmann, Amr ElDeeb, Alkomiet Hasan, Steffen Moritz, Markus Jäger, Claudia Leucht, Jim van Os, John M Davis","doi":"10.1007/s00406-025-02045-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lawrence Weed introduced the \"Problem-Oriented Medical Records\" (POMR) approach to medicine. Its core principle is that treatment should be organised around patients' specific problems. This approach gained widespread adoption in the United States during the 1970s. However, few studies have compared POMR with the traditional \"source-based\" method, and evidence supporting its application in mental health remains particularly limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We carried out a narrative review to examine whether POMR is appropriate for mental health care and which modifications are necessary for this purpose.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Psychiatry and psychotherapy address brain-mediated disorders that lack clear biological markers. Diagnoses rely on the assessment of psychopathological symptoms, which are grouped into syndromes. These symptoms and syndromes can be effectively categorized as \"problems\". Given that psychiatric treatment is often symptomatic in that it focuses on symptoms rather than diagnoses, POMR provides an ideal framework for organizing care. Furthermore, mental health is inherently multidimensional, encompassing biological, psychological, social, and existential domains. This complexity necessitates interdisciplinary collaboration. However, under the conventional source-based approach, professional groups often operate in parallel rather than jointly together. POMR, by contrast, facilitates seamless collaboration by aligning teams around patient-centred problems. A special aspect of mental health care is the emphasis on considering patients' individual goals and resources, rather than focusing only on their deficits.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>By systematically applying POMR to psychiatric care-particularly through tightly coordinated interdisciplinary treatment-clinicians could enhance both clinical and functional outcomes, improve both patient and team satisfaction, and better align treatment with patients' unique needs. To support this approach, we propose a practical grid which we refer to as the Problem-Resources-Goals Oriented framework (PRoGO), reflecting the necessary adaptations for mental health. Clinical trials are warranted to assess the effectiveness of POMR/PRoGO in psychiatric practice and its potential to advance the field.</p>","PeriodicalId":11822,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing mental health care: a problem, resources and goals oriented multidimensional framework (PRoGO).\",\"authors\":\"Stefan Leucht, Bernhard König, Antonio di Francesco, Alessandro Rodolico, Josef Priller, Kerem Böge, Wolfgang Strube, Jochen Gensichen, Peter Bechmann, Amr ElDeeb, Alkomiet Hasan, Steffen Moritz, Markus Jäger, Claudia Leucht, Jim van Os, John M Davis\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00406-025-02045-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lawrence Weed introduced the \\\"Problem-Oriented Medical Records\\\" (POMR) approach to medicine. Its core principle is that treatment should be organised around patients' specific problems. This approach gained widespread adoption in the United States during the 1970s. However, few studies have compared POMR with the traditional \\\"source-based\\\" method, and evidence supporting its application in mental health remains particularly limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We carried out a narrative review to examine whether POMR is appropriate for mental health care and which modifications are necessary for this purpose.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Psychiatry and psychotherapy address brain-mediated disorders that lack clear biological markers. Diagnoses rely on the assessment of psychopathological symptoms, which are grouped into syndromes. These symptoms and syndromes can be effectively categorized as \\\"problems\\\". Given that psychiatric treatment is often symptomatic in that it focuses on symptoms rather than diagnoses, POMR provides an ideal framework for organizing care. Furthermore, mental health is inherently multidimensional, encompassing biological, psychological, social, and existential domains. This complexity necessitates interdisciplinary collaboration. However, under the conventional source-based approach, professional groups often operate in parallel rather than jointly together. POMR, by contrast, facilitates seamless collaboration by aligning teams around patient-centred problems. A special aspect of mental health care is the emphasis on considering patients' individual goals and resources, rather than focusing only on their deficits.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>By systematically applying POMR to psychiatric care-particularly through tightly coordinated interdisciplinary treatment-clinicians could enhance both clinical and functional outcomes, improve both patient and team satisfaction, and better align treatment with patients' unique needs. To support this approach, we propose a practical grid which we refer to as the Problem-Resources-Goals Oriented framework (PRoGO), reflecting the necessary adaptations for mental health. Clinical trials are warranted to assess the effectiveness of POMR/PRoGO in psychiatric practice and its potential to advance the field.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11822,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-025-02045-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-025-02045-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:劳伦斯·威德提出了“问题导向医疗记录”(POMR)的医学方法。它的核心原则是治疗应该围绕病人的具体问题来组织。这种方法在20世纪70年代在美国得到广泛采用。然而,很少有研究将POMR与传统的“基于来源”的方法进行比较,支持其在精神卫生方面应用的证据仍然特别有限。方法:我们进行了一项叙述性回顾,以检验POMR是否适用于精神卫生保健,以及为此目的需要哪些修改。研究结果:精神病学和心理疗法解决缺乏明确生物学标记的脑介导性疾病。诊断依赖于对精神病理症状的评估,这些症状被分为综合症。这些症状和综合征可以有效地归类为“问题”。鉴于精神病治疗往往是症状性的,因为它侧重于症状而不是诊断,POMR为组织护理提供了一个理想的框架。此外,心理健康本质上是多维的,包括生物、心理、社会和存在领域。这种复杂性需要跨学科的合作。然而,在传统的基于资源的方法下,专业小组往往并行运作,而不是联合起来。相比之下,POMR通过围绕以患者为中心的问题协调团队,促进了无缝协作。精神卫生保健的一个特殊方面是强调考虑病人的个人目标和资源,而不是只关注他们的缺陷。解释:通过系统地将POMR应用于精神病治疗,特别是通过紧密协调的跨学科治疗,临床医生可以提高临床和功能结果,提高患者和团队的满意度,并更好地将治疗与患者的独特需求结合起来。为了支持这种方法,我们提出了一个实用的网格,我们称之为问题-资源-目标导向框架(PRoGO),反映了心理健康的必要适应。临床试验是必要的,以评估POMR/PRoGO在精神病学实践中的有效性及其推进该领域的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing mental health care: a problem, resources and goals oriented multidimensional framework (PRoGO).

Background: Lawrence Weed introduced the "Problem-Oriented Medical Records" (POMR) approach to medicine. Its core principle is that treatment should be organised around patients' specific problems. This approach gained widespread adoption in the United States during the 1970s. However, few studies have compared POMR with the traditional "source-based" method, and evidence supporting its application in mental health remains particularly limited.

Methods: We carried out a narrative review to examine whether POMR is appropriate for mental health care and which modifications are necessary for this purpose.

Findings: Psychiatry and psychotherapy address brain-mediated disorders that lack clear biological markers. Diagnoses rely on the assessment of psychopathological symptoms, which are grouped into syndromes. These symptoms and syndromes can be effectively categorized as "problems". Given that psychiatric treatment is often symptomatic in that it focuses on symptoms rather than diagnoses, POMR provides an ideal framework for organizing care. Furthermore, mental health is inherently multidimensional, encompassing biological, psychological, social, and existential domains. This complexity necessitates interdisciplinary collaboration. However, under the conventional source-based approach, professional groups often operate in parallel rather than jointly together. POMR, by contrast, facilitates seamless collaboration by aligning teams around patient-centred problems. A special aspect of mental health care is the emphasis on considering patients' individual goals and resources, rather than focusing only on their deficits.

Interpretation: By systematically applying POMR to psychiatric care-particularly through tightly coordinated interdisciplinary treatment-clinicians could enhance both clinical and functional outcomes, improve both patient and team satisfaction, and better align treatment with patients' unique needs. To support this approach, we propose a practical grid which we refer to as the Problem-Resources-Goals Oriented framework (PRoGO), reflecting the necessary adaptations for mental health. Clinical trials are warranted to assess the effectiveness of POMR/PRoGO in psychiatric practice and its potential to advance the field.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
154
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The original papers published in the European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience deal with all aspects of psychiatry and related clinical neuroscience. Clinical psychiatry, psychopathology, epidemiology as well as brain imaging, neuropathological, neurophysiological, neurochemical and moleculargenetic studies of psychiatric disorders are among the topics covered. Thus both the clinician and the neuroscientist are provided with a handy source of information on important scientific developments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信