利用电子健康记录识别阿尔茨海默病的常见疾病轨迹。

IF 10.8 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
EBioMedicine Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-30 DOI:10.1016/j.ebiom.2025.105831
Mingzhou Fu, Sriram Sankararaman, Bogdan Pasaniuc, Keith Vossel, Timothy S Chang
{"title":"利用电子健康记录识别阿尔茨海默病的常见疾病轨迹。","authors":"Mingzhou Fu, Sriram Sankararaman, Bogdan Pasaniuc, Keith Vossel, Timothy S Chang","doi":"10.1016/j.ebiom.2025.105831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a leading cause of dementia and an escalating public health concern. Although recent research has identified multiple AD risk factors, most studies examine isolated comorbidities rather than complex, sequential progressions. In this study, we sought to identify multi-step trajectories culminating in AD by analysing longitudinal electronic health records (EHRs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed data from 24,473 patients in the University of California Health Data Warehouse (UCHDW). A Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard model identified temporally associated diagnoses, from which we constructed diagnostic trajectories. We employed dynamic time warping and k-means clustering to group similar trajectories, and network analyses to characterize their common structures. Causal inferences were explored using the Greedy Equivalence Search algorithm. Validation in the UCHDW included association tests and comparison to control groups. We further validated our findings in the All of Us Research Program, a diverse, nationally representative cohort.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>After filtering, 5762 patients contributed 6794 unique AD progression trajectories, revealing four major trajectory clusters: mental health, encephalopathy, mild cognitive impairment, and vascular disease. These clusters differed significantly in demographic and clinical features. Approximately 26% of edges showed consistent directional ordering (e.g., hypertension → depressive episode → AD). In an independent population, these multi-step trajectories conferred greater AD risk than single diagnoses alone. Our validation in the All of Us cohort confirmed the reproducibility of these trajectory patterns in a more diverse population.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Our findings demonstrate the value of examining sequential diagnostic patterns in AD pathogenesis. Multi-step progressions reveal potential latent contributors to AD, offering pathways for risk stratification, early detection, and targeted interventions.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This study was supported by the National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Aging, the National Science Foundation, the Hillblom and Fineberg Foundations, and the California Department of Public Health.</p>","PeriodicalId":11494,"journal":{"name":"EBioMedicine","volume":"118 ","pages":"105831"},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12266379/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying common disease trajectories of Alzheimer's disease with electronic health records.\",\"authors\":\"Mingzhou Fu, Sriram Sankararaman, Bogdan Pasaniuc, Keith Vossel, Timothy S Chang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ebiom.2025.105831\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a leading cause of dementia and an escalating public health concern. Although recent research has identified multiple AD risk factors, most studies examine isolated comorbidities rather than complex, sequential progressions. In this study, we sought to identify multi-step trajectories culminating in AD by analysing longitudinal electronic health records (EHRs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed data from 24,473 patients in the University of California Health Data Warehouse (UCHDW). A Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard model identified temporally associated diagnoses, from which we constructed diagnostic trajectories. We employed dynamic time warping and k-means clustering to group similar trajectories, and network analyses to characterize their common structures. Causal inferences were explored using the Greedy Equivalence Search algorithm. Validation in the UCHDW included association tests and comparison to control groups. We further validated our findings in the All of Us Research Program, a diverse, nationally representative cohort.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>After filtering, 5762 patients contributed 6794 unique AD progression trajectories, revealing four major trajectory clusters: mental health, encephalopathy, mild cognitive impairment, and vascular disease. These clusters differed significantly in demographic and clinical features. Approximately 26% of edges showed consistent directional ordering (e.g., hypertension → depressive episode → AD). In an independent population, these multi-step trajectories conferred greater AD risk than single diagnoses alone. Our validation in the All of Us cohort confirmed the reproducibility of these trajectory patterns in a more diverse population.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Our findings demonstrate the value of examining sequential diagnostic patterns in AD pathogenesis. Multi-step progressions reveal potential latent contributors to AD, offering pathways for risk stratification, early detection, and targeted interventions.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This study was supported by the National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Aging, the National Science Foundation, the Hillblom and Fineberg Foundations, and the California Department of Public Health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EBioMedicine\",\"volume\":\"118 \",\"pages\":\"105831\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12266379/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EBioMedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2025.105831\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EBioMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2025.105831","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:阿尔茨海默病(AD)是痴呆症的主要病因,也是一个日益严重的公共卫生问题。虽然最近的研究已经确定了多种阿尔茨海默病的危险因素,但大多数研究检查的是孤立的合并症,而不是复杂的、连续的进展。在这项研究中,我们试图通过分析纵向电子健康记录(EHRs)来确定最终导致AD的多步骤轨迹。方法:我们分析了来自加利福尼亚大学健康数据仓库(UCHDW)的24,473例患者的数据。细灰色亚分布风险模型确定了与时间相关的诊断,并据此构建了诊断轨迹。我们使用动态时间翘曲和k-means聚类对相似的轨迹进行分组,并使用网络分析来表征它们的共同结构。利用贪婪等价搜索算法探索因果推理。UCHDW中的验证包括关联测试和与对照组的比较。我们在“我们所有人”研究项目中进一步验证了我们的发现,这是一个多元化的、具有全国代表性的队列。结果:经过筛选,5762例患者提供了6794个独特的AD进展轨迹,揭示了四个主要的轨迹群:精神健康、脑病、轻度认知障碍和血管疾病。这些群集在人口学和临床特征上有显著差异。约26%的边缘显示一致的方向顺序(例如,高血压→抑郁发作→AD)。在一个独立的人群中,这些多步骤的轨迹比单独诊断的AD风险更大。我们在All of Us队列中的验证证实了这些轨迹模式在更多样化的人群中的可重复性。解释:我们的研究结果证明了在阿尔茨海默病发病机制中检查顺序诊断模式的价值。多步骤进展揭示了阿尔茨海默病的潜在因素,为风险分层、早期发现和有针对性的干预提供了途径。资助:本研究由美国国立卫生研究院、美国国家老龄化研究所、美国国家科学基金会、Hillblom和Fineberg基金会以及加州公共卫生部支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identifying common disease trajectories of Alzheimer's disease with electronic health records.

Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a leading cause of dementia and an escalating public health concern. Although recent research has identified multiple AD risk factors, most studies examine isolated comorbidities rather than complex, sequential progressions. In this study, we sought to identify multi-step trajectories culminating in AD by analysing longitudinal electronic health records (EHRs).

Methods: We analysed data from 24,473 patients in the University of California Health Data Warehouse (UCHDW). A Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard model identified temporally associated diagnoses, from which we constructed diagnostic trajectories. We employed dynamic time warping and k-means clustering to group similar trajectories, and network analyses to characterize their common structures. Causal inferences were explored using the Greedy Equivalence Search algorithm. Validation in the UCHDW included association tests and comparison to control groups. We further validated our findings in the All of Us Research Program, a diverse, nationally representative cohort.

Findings: After filtering, 5762 patients contributed 6794 unique AD progression trajectories, revealing four major trajectory clusters: mental health, encephalopathy, mild cognitive impairment, and vascular disease. These clusters differed significantly in demographic and clinical features. Approximately 26% of edges showed consistent directional ordering (e.g., hypertension → depressive episode → AD). In an independent population, these multi-step trajectories conferred greater AD risk than single diagnoses alone. Our validation in the All of Us cohort confirmed the reproducibility of these trajectory patterns in a more diverse population.

Interpretation: Our findings demonstrate the value of examining sequential diagnostic patterns in AD pathogenesis. Multi-step progressions reveal potential latent contributors to AD, offering pathways for risk stratification, early detection, and targeted interventions.

Funding: This study was supported by the National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Aging, the National Science Foundation, the Hillblom and Fineberg Foundations, and the California Department of Public Health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EBioMedicine
EBioMedicine Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
0.90%
发文量
579
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: eBioMedicine is a comprehensive biomedical research journal that covers a wide range of studies that are relevant to human health. Our focus is on original research that explores the fundamental factors influencing human health and disease, including the discovery of new therapeutic targets and treatments, the identification of biomarkers and diagnostic tools, and the investigation and modification of disease pathways and mechanisms. We welcome studies from any biomedical discipline that contribute to our understanding of disease and aim to improve human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信