参与模拟训练的相关因素。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Anders L Schram, Nadja L Bonne, Tine B Henriksen, Niels T Hertel, Morten S Lindhard
{"title":"参与模拟训练的相关因素。","authors":"Anders L Schram, Nadja L Bonne, Tine B Henriksen, Niels T Hertel, Morten S Lindhard","doi":"10.61409/A12240914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Simulation-based training is used to prepare healthcare professionals for clinical situations in a structured environment. However, participation varies depending on personal, professional and institutional factors. This study aimed to identify factors associated with participation to inform inclusive training programme designs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed longitudinal data from 1,825 healthcare professionals across eight paediatric departments in two Danish regions over 15 months. Logistic regression was used to examine associations between simulation participation and factors such as age, gender, profession, experience, hospital type, sick leave, and patient safety culture.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Doctors were more likely to participate than nurses (OR = 1.5, 95% CI: 1.0; 2.1), and staff at regional hospitals were much more likely to participate than staff at university hospitals (OR = 4.8, 95% CI: 3.6; 6.2). Age, experience, sick leave, and safety culture dimensions showed trends, but none were statistically significant. Gender was not associated with participation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Professional roles and institutional context may influence simulation participation. Tailored strategies targeting nurses, early-career professionals, and university hospital staff may help increase participation and support sustained training efforts.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>The Elsass Foundation and the Central Denmark Region.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong></p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov (no. NCT06064045).</p>","PeriodicalId":11119,"journal":{"name":"Danish medical journal","volume":"72 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors associated with participation in simulation-based training.\",\"authors\":\"Anders L Schram, Nadja L Bonne, Tine B Henriksen, Niels T Hertel, Morten S Lindhard\",\"doi\":\"10.61409/A12240914\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Simulation-based training is used to prepare healthcare professionals for clinical situations in a structured environment. However, participation varies depending on personal, professional and institutional factors. This study aimed to identify factors associated with participation to inform inclusive training programme designs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed longitudinal data from 1,825 healthcare professionals across eight paediatric departments in two Danish regions over 15 months. Logistic regression was used to examine associations between simulation participation and factors such as age, gender, profession, experience, hospital type, sick leave, and patient safety culture.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Doctors were more likely to participate than nurses (OR = 1.5, 95% CI: 1.0; 2.1), and staff at regional hospitals were much more likely to participate than staff at university hospitals (OR = 4.8, 95% CI: 3.6; 6.2). Age, experience, sick leave, and safety culture dimensions showed trends, but none were statistically significant. Gender was not associated with participation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Professional roles and institutional context may influence simulation participation. Tailored strategies targeting nurses, early-career professionals, and university hospital staff may help increase participation and support sustained training efforts.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>The Elsass Foundation and the Central Denmark Region.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong></p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov (no. NCT06064045).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Danish medical journal\",\"volume\":\"72 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Danish medical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.61409/A12240914\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Danish medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61409/A12240914","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:基于模拟的培训用于为结构化环境中的临床情况准备医疗保健专业人员。然而,参与程度因个人、专业和制度因素而异。本研究旨在确定与参与相关的因素,为包容性培训计划设计提供信息。方法:我们分析了来自丹麦两个地区八个儿科的1825名医疗保健专业人员超过15个月的纵向数据。使用逻辑回归来检验模拟参与与年龄、性别、职业、经验、医院类型、病假和患者安全文化等因素之间的关联。结果:医生比护士更有可能参与(OR = 1.5, 95% CI: 1.0;2.1),地区医院的工作人员比大学医院的工作人员更有可能参与(OR = 4.8, 95% CI: 3.6;6.2)。年龄、工作经验、病假和安全文化维度呈现趋势,但没有统计学意义。性别与参与无关。结论:专业角色和机构背景可能影响模拟参与。针对护士、早期职业专业人员和大学医院工作人员的量身定制的战略可能有助于增加参与和支持持续的培训工作。资助:埃尔萨斯基金会和丹麦中部地区。试验注册:Clinicaltrials: govNCT06064045)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors associated with participation in simulation-based training.

Introduction: Simulation-based training is used to prepare healthcare professionals for clinical situations in a structured environment. However, participation varies depending on personal, professional and institutional factors. This study aimed to identify factors associated with participation to inform inclusive training programme designs.

Methods: We analysed longitudinal data from 1,825 healthcare professionals across eight paediatric departments in two Danish regions over 15 months. Logistic regression was used to examine associations between simulation participation and factors such as age, gender, profession, experience, hospital type, sick leave, and patient safety culture.

Results: Doctors were more likely to participate than nurses (OR = 1.5, 95% CI: 1.0; 2.1), and staff at regional hospitals were much more likely to participate than staff at university hospitals (OR = 4.8, 95% CI: 3.6; 6.2). Age, experience, sick leave, and safety culture dimensions showed trends, but none were statistically significant. Gender was not associated with participation.

Conclusions: Professional roles and institutional context may influence simulation participation. Tailored strategies targeting nurses, early-career professionals, and university hospital staff may help increase participation and support sustained training efforts.

Funding: The Elsass Foundation and the Central Denmark Region.

Trial registration:

Clinicaltrials: gov (no. NCT06064045).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Danish medical journal
Danish medical journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
78
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Danish Medical Journal (DMJ) is a general medical journal. The journal publish original research in English – conducted in or in relation to the Danish health-care system. When writing for the Danish Medical Journal please remember target audience which is the general reader. This means that the research area should be relevant to many readers and the paper should be presented in a way that most readers will understand the content. DMJ will publish the following articles: • Original articles • Protocol articles from large randomized clinical trials • Systematic reviews and meta-analyses • PhD theses from Danish faculties of health sciences • DMSc theses from Danish faculties of health sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信