运动诱导的肠道微生物群多样性和组成改变的影响:比较不同训练方式的效果。

IF 4 Q2 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING
Yihan Wang, Shuang Bai, Tiance Yang, Jianjun Guo, Xiaoming Zhu, Ying Dong
{"title":"运动诱导的肠道微生物群多样性和组成改变的影响:比较不同训练方式的效果。","authors":"Yihan Wang, Shuang Bai, Tiance Yang, Jianjun Guo, Xiaoming Zhu, Ying Dong","doi":"10.1186/s13619-025-00244-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Exercise has been shown to influence gut microbiota composition, but the specific effects of different exercise modalities on microbial diversity remain unclear. Understanding these differences is essential for optimizing exercise programs to enhance both physical fitness and gut health. This study compared the gut microbiota profiles of participants undergoing moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT), high-intensity interval training (HIIT), and high-intensity functional training (HIFT) using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Thirty-one previously untrained healthy university students were randomly assigned into MICT (n = 7), HIIT (n = 12) and HIFT (n = 12). The results revealed that distinct gut microbiome profiles in participants under different exercise modes. Notably, the alpha-diversity gradually increased from the MICT group to the HIFT group. In addition, there was a progressive shift towards a Faecalibacterium-dominated microbial type from HIIT to HIFT group compared to MICT group. Individuals in the HIFT group were identified to be enriched with Lactobacillus and Limosilactobacillus, along with reduced Actinomyces and Anaeromassilibacillus. Functionally, the KEGG pathway and enzyme analysis using PICRUST2 revealed that the HIFT group exhibited prominence in muscle function-related pathways and enzymes, specifically ko00280 (valine, leucine, and isoleucine degradation), as well as the enzyme EC: 3.4.11.14 (alanine aminopeptidase). In conclusion, these findings highlight how exercise modality influences gut microbial diversity, with HIFT promoting a more favorable microbial profile compared to traditional endurance training. Understanding these effects can help tailor exercise programs to improve both fitness and gut health.</p>","PeriodicalId":9811,"journal":{"name":"Cell Regeneration","volume":"14 1","pages":"28"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12222581/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of exercise-induced alterations on gut microbiota diversity and composition: comparing effects of different training modalities.\",\"authors\":\"Yihan Wang, Shuang Bai, Tiance Yang, Jianjun Guo, Xiaoming Zhu, Ying Dong\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13619-025-00244-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Exercise has been shown to influence gut microbiota composition, but the specific effects of different exercise modalities on microbial diversity remain unclear. Understanding these differences is essential for optimizing exercise programs to enhance both physical fitness and gut health. This study compared the gut microbiota profiles of participants undergoing moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT), high-intensity interval training (HIIT), and high-intensity functional training (HIFT) using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Thirty-one previously untrained healthy university students were randomly assigned into MICT (n = 7), HIIT (n = 12) and HIFT (n = 12). The results revealed that distinct gut microbiome profiles in participants under different exercise modes. Notably, the alpha-diversity gradually increased from the MICT group to the HIFT group. In addition, there was a progressive shift towards a Faecalibacterium-dominated microbial type from HIIT to HIFT group compared to MICT group. Individuals in the HIFT group were identified to be enriched with Lactobacillus and Limosilactobacillus, along with reduced Actinomyces and Anaeromassilibacillus. Functionally, the KEGG pathway and enzyme analysis using PICRUST2 revealed that the HIFT group exhibited prominence in muscle function-related pathways and enzymes, specifically ko00280 (valine, leucine, and isoleucine degradation), as well as the enzyme EC: 3.4.11.14 (alanine aminopeptidase). In conclusion, these findings highlight how exercise modality influences gut microbial diversity, with HIFT promoting a more favorable microbial profile compared to traditional endurance training. Understanding these effects can help tailor exercise programs to improve both fitness and gut health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cell Regeneration\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12222581/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cell Regeneration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13619-025-00244-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell Regeneration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13619-025-00244-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

运动已被证明会影响肠道微生物群的组成,但不同的运动方式对微生物多样性的具体影响尚不清楚。了解这些差异对于优化锻炼计划以增强身体健康和肠道健康至关重要。本研究使用16S rRNA基因测序比较了接受中等强度连续训练(MICT)、高强度间歇训练(HIIT)和高强度功能训练(HIFT)的参与者的肠道微生物群特征。31名未经训练的健康大学生被随机分为MICT组(n = 7)、HIIT组(n = 12)和HIFT组(n = 12)。结果显示,在不同的运动模式下,参与者的肠道微生物群特征不同。值得注意的是,从MICT组到HIFT组,α -多样性逐渐增加。此外,与MICT组相比,HIIT组向HIFT组逐渐转变为faecalibacterium主导的微生物类型。HIFT组的个体被鉴定为富含乳酸杆菌和乳酸杆菌,以及减少的放线菌和厌氧massilibacillus。功能上,KEGG通路和PICRUST2酶分析显示,HIFT组在肌肉功能相关通路和酶方面表现突出,特别是ko00280(缬氨酸、亮氨酸和异亮氨酸降解)和EC: 3.4.11.14(丙氨酸氨基肽酶)。总之,这些发现强调了运动方式如何影响肠道微生物多样性,与传统的耐力训练相比,高强度训练促进了更有利的微生物特征。了解这些影响可以帮助制定锻炼计划,以改善健康和肠道健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of exercise-induced alterations on gut microbiota diversity and composition: comparing effects of different training modalities.

Exercise has been shown to influence gut microbiota composition, but the specific effects of different exercise modalities on microbial diversity remain unclear. Understanding these differences is essential for optimizing exercise programs to enhance both physical fitness and gut health. This study compared the gut microbiota profiles of participants undergoing moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT), high-intensity interval training (HIIT), and high-intensity functional training (HIFT) using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Thirty-one previously untrained healthy university students were randomly assigned into MICT (n = 7), HIIT (n = 12) and HIFT (n = 12). The results revealed that distinct gut microbiome profiles in participants under different exercise modes. Notably, the alpha-diversity gradually increased from the MICT group to the HIFT group. In addition, there was a progressive shift towards a Faecalibacterium-dominated microbial type from HIIT to HIFT group compared to MICT group. Individuals in the HIFT group were identified to be enriched with Lactobacillus and Limosilactobacillus, along with reduced Actinomyces and Anaeromassilibacillus. Functionally, the KEGG pathway and enzyme analysis using PICRUST2 revealed that the HIFT group exhibited prominence in muscle function-related pathways and enzymes, specifically ko00280 (valine, leucine, and isoleucine degradation), as well as the enzyme EC: 3.4.11.14 (alanine aminopeptidase). In conclusion, these findings highlight how exercise modality influences gut microbial diversity, with HIFT promoting a more favorable microbial profile compared to traditional endurance training. Understanding these effects can help tailor exercise programs to improve both fitness and gut health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cell Regeneration
Cell Regeneration Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Cell Biology
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Cell Regeneration aims to provide a worldwide platform for researches on stem cells and regenerative biology to develop basic science and to foster its clinical translation in medicine. Cell Regeneration welcomes reports on novel discoveries, theories, methods, technologies, and products in the field of stem cells and regenerative research, the journal is interested, but not limited to the following topics: ◎ Embryonic stem cells ◎ Induced pluripotent stem cells ◎ Tissue-specific stem cells ◎ Tissue or organ regeneration ◎ Methodology ◎ Biomaterials and regeneration ◎ Clinical translation or application in medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信