以患者为中心的复杂干预提高初级保健中心血管疾病和糖尿病治疗的初始药物依从性的有效性(IMA-cRCT研究):一项使用真实世界数据的实用聚类随机对照试验。

IF 5.6 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Carmen Corral-Partearroyo, Alba Sánchez-Viñas, Ignacio Aznar-Lou, María Teresa Peñarrubia-María, Montserrat Gil-Girbau, Carmen Gallardo-González, María Del Carmen Olmos-Palenzuela, Maria Rubio-Valera
{"title":"以患者为中心的复杂干预提高初级保健中心血管疾病和糖尿病治疗的初始药物依从性的有效性(IMA-cRCT研究):一项使用真实世界数据的实用聚类随机对照试验。","authors":"Carmen Corral-Partearroyo, Alba Sánchez-Viñas, Ignacio Aznar-Lou, María Teresa Peñarrubia-María, Montserrat Gil-Girbau, Carmen Gallardo-González, María Del Carmen Olmos-Palenzuela, Maria Rubio-Valera","doi":"10.1136/bmjqs-2024-018402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Non-adherence to cardiovascular disease and diabetes treatments contributes to suboptimal clinical outcomes and higher cost. The initial medication adherence (IMA) intervention is a multidisciplinary primary care (PC) intervention based on shared decision-making (SDM). The IMA-cluster-randomised controlled trial (cRCT) study evaluated the impact of the IMA intervention on medication initiation, secondary adherence and clinical outcomes compared with usual care (UC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a pragmatic cRCT with a hybrid effectiveness-implementation design which randomised 24 PC centres in Spain to intervention or UC. Patients receiving a new prescription of antihypertensive, lipid-lowering, antiplatelet and/or oral/injectable antidiabetic medication at the intervention centres (March 2022-September 2022) were attended by general practitioners (GPs), nurses and community pharmacists who had been trained in SDM and given decision aids (leaflets and website). Real-world data from prescription and dispensing records-used to assess medication initiation and secondary adherence (correct dosing and continued use)-and clinical outcome data from electronic health records were collected up to 18 months after initial prescription and analysed using multilevel regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 4910 prescriptions were issued to 3629 patients (Intervention=2148; UC=1481) by 150 GPs (Intervention=91; UC=59). No differences were detected between groups in medication initiation or secondary adherence. Among clinical outcomes, only blood pressure outcomes favoured the IMA intervention, reflecting a small but clinically meaningful improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The IMA intervention had limited overall impact, with no effect on adherence, but showed potential benefits in blood pressure. However, SDM, as an ethically grounded approach, may enhance patients and professional experiences, supporting its consideration for broader implementation. Future efforts should prioritise these benefits by investing in professional training and patient support, addressing implementation challenges and deepening understanding of SDM effects, which would warrant further evaluation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT05026775.</p>","PeriodicalId":9077,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Quality & Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of a patient-centred complex intervention to improve Initial Medication Adherence to cardiovascular disease and diabetes treatments in primary care (the IMA-cRCT study): a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial using real-world data.\",\"authors\":\"Carmen Corral-Partearroyo, Alba Sánchez-Viñas, Ignacio Aznar-Lou, María Teresa Peñarrubia-María, Montserrat Gil-Girbau, Carmen Gallardo-González, María Del Carmen Olmos-Palenzuela, Maria Rubio-Valera\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjqs-2024-018402\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Non-adherence to cardiovascular disease and diabetes treatments contributes to suboptimal clinical outcomes and higher cost. The initial medication adherence (IMA) intervention is a multidisciplinary primary care (PC) intervention based on shared decision-making (SDM). The IMA-cluster-randomised controlled trial (cRCT) study evaluated the impact of the IMA intervention on medication initiation, secondary adherence and clinical outcomes compared with usual care (UC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a pragmatic cRCT with a hybrid effectiveness-implementation design which randomised 24 PC centres in Spain to intervention or UC. Patients receiving a new prescription of antihypertensive, lipid-lowering, antiplatelet and/or oral/injectable antidiabetic medication at the intervention centres (March 2022-September 2022) were attended by general practitioners (GPs), nurses and community pharmacists who had been trained in SDM and given decision aids (leaflets and website). Real-world data from prescription and dispensing records-used to assess medication initiation and secondary adherence (correct dosing and continued use)-and clinical outcome data from electronic health records were collected up to 18 months after initial prescription and analysed using multilevel regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 4910 prescriptions were issued to 3629 patients (Intervention=2148; UC=1481) by 150 GPs (Intervention=91; UC=59). No differences were detected between groups in medication initiation or secondary adherence. Among clinical outcomes, only blood pressure outcomes favoured the IMA intervention, reflecting a small but clinically meaningful improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The IMA intervention had limited overall impact, with no effect on adherence, but showed potential benefits in blood pressure. However, SDM, as an ethically grounded approach, may enhance patients and professional experiences, supporting its consideration for broader implementation. Future efforts should prioritise these benefits by investing in professional training and patient support, addressing implementation challenges and deepening understanding of SDM effects, which would warrant further evaluation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT05026775.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Quality & Safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Quality & Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2024-018402\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Quality & Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2024-018402","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

不坚持心血管疾病和糖尿病治疗导致临床结果不理想和成本较高。初始药物依从性(IMA)干预是一种基于共同决策(SDM)的多学科初级保健(PC)干预。与常规护理(UC)相比,IMA集群随机对照试验(cRCT)研究评估了IMA干预对药物起始、二次依从性和临床结果的影响。方法:这是一项实用的cRCT,采用混合有效性-实施设计,将西班牙的24个PC中心随机分为干预组或UC组。在干预中心(2022年3月至2022年9月),接受降压、降脂、抗血小板和/或口服/注射抗糖尿病药物新处方的患者由接受过SDM培训的全科医生(gp)、护士和社区药剂师参加,并给予决策辅助(传单和网站)。来自处方和配药记录的真实数据——用于评估药物开始和二次依从性(正确给药和继续使用)——以及来自电子健康记录的临床结果数据,收集至初始处方后18个月,并使用多水平回归模型进行分析。结果:共向3629例患者发放处方4910张(干预=2148;UC=1481) 150 gp(干预=91;加州大学= 59)。两组在开始用药或二次依从性方面没有发现差异。在临床结果中,只有血压结果有利于IMA干预,反映了一个小但有临床意义的改善。结论:IMA干预的总体影响有限,对依从性没有影响,但在血压方面显示出潜在的益处。然而,SDM作为一种基于道德的方法,可以提高患者和专业经验,支持其考虑更广泛的实施。未来的努力应优先考虑这些好处,投资于专业培训和患者支持,解决实施挑战,加深对可持续发展机制效果的理解,这需要进一步评估。试验注册号:NCT05026775。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of a patient-centred complex intervention to improve Initial Medication Adherence to cardiovascular disease and diabetes treatments in primary care (the IMA-cRCT study): a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial using real-world data.

Introduction: Non-adherence to cardiovascular disease and diabetes treatments contributes to suboptimal clinical outcomes and higher cost. The initial medication adherence (IMA) intervention is a multidisciplinary primary care (PC) intervention based on shared decision-making (SDM). The IMA-cluster-randomised controlled trial (cRCT) study evaluated the impact of the IMA intervention on medication initiation, secondary adherence and clinical outcomes compared with usual care (UC).

Methods: This was a pragmatic cRCT with a hybrid effectiveness-implementation design which randomised 24 PC centres in Spain to intervention or UC. Patients receiving a new prescription of antihypertensive, lipid-lowering, antiplatelet and/or oral/injectable antidiabetic medication at the intervention centres (March 2022-September 2022) were attended by general practitioners (GPs), nurses and community pharmacists who had been trained in SDM and given decision aids (leaflets and website). Real-world data from prescription and dispensing records-used to assess medication initiation and secondary adherence (correct dosing and continued use)-and clinical outcome data from electronic health records were collected up to 18 months after initial prescription and analysed using multilevel regression models.

Results: Overall, 4910 prescriptions were issued to 3629 patients (Intervention=2148; UC=1481) by 150 GPs (Intervention=91; UC=59). No differences were detected between groups in medication initiation or secondary adherence. Among clinical outcomes, only blood pressure outcomes favoured the IMA intervention, reflecting a small but clinically meaningful improvement.

Conclusions: The IMA intervention had limited overall impact, with no effect on adherence, but showed potential benefits in blood pressure. However, SDM, as an ethically grounded approach, may enhance patients and professional experiences, supporting its consideration for broader implementation. Future efforts should prioritise these benefits by investing in professional training and patient support, addressing implementation challenges and deepening understanding of SDM effects, which would warrant further evaluation.

Trial registration number: NCT05026775.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Quality & Safety
BMJ Quality & Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
104
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Quality & Safety (previously Quality & Safety in Health Care) is an international peer review publication providing research, opinions, debates and reviews for academics, clinicians and healthcare managers focused on the quality and safety of health care and the science of improvement. The journal receives approximately 1000 manuscripts a year and has an acceptance rate for original research of 12%. Time from submission to first decision averages 22 days and accepted articles are typically published online within 20 days. Its current impact factor is 3.281.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信