非洲屠宰场:对做法的范围审查、影响实施良好做法的因素以及建议的改进解决办法。

IF 2.6 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Askale Gizaw Nigussie, Fiona Vande Velde, Edilu Jorga Sarba, Bersissa Kumsa, Sarah Gabriel
{"title":"非洲屠宰场:对做法的范围审查、影响实施良好做法的因素以及建议的改进解决办法。","authors":"Askale Gizaw Nigussie, Fiona Vande Velde, Edilu Jorga Sarba, Bersissa Kumsa, Sarah Gabriel","doi":"10.1186/s12917-025-04743-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Africa, ongoing challenges posed by zoonotic foodborne diseases highlight the need to improve control practices. This review aims to present a structured overview by summarizing documented practices in African abattoirs, factors influencing the implementation of either poor or good practices, and the recommended solutions to enhance good practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review followed the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, the Arksey and O'Malley methodological framework, and the Population-Concept-Context framework. To identify relevant articles, searches were conducted across the Scopus, PubMed, PubMed Central, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science databases, along with additional records from African Journal Online, Google, and Google Scholar.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 1,547 identified articles, 91 that met the eligibility criteria were included in the final analysis. These studies were conducted in 12 African countries, including Nigeria, Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, Sudan, Cameroon, Morocco, South Africa, Uganda, Tanzania, Egypt, and Sierra Leone. The review identified several poor meat-processing practices, such as a lack of inspections, unhygienic processing, inadequate cleaning, improper meat storage, and poor waste disposal. On the other hand, the current scoping review identified good practices, such as documenting and reporting inspection findings, waste treatment, waste reuse, timely meat delivery, and the reversal of these poor practices. Barriers to good practices were weak policies, lack of basic infrastructure and facilities, insufficient funds, absence of supervision, poor enforcement, poor information flow, lack of knowledge, and inadequate training. Good practices were facilitated by factors like available policy, the establishment and use of critical control points, and basic infrastructure and facilities. Results of the present scoping review also demonstrate that recommended solutions for improvement include following guidelines, developing policies, better enforcement, providing basic infrastructure and facilities, providing training, collaboration, and adopting the One Health approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This scoping review identified a range of poor and good practices and factors that influence the implementation of such practices and recommended improvement solutions. Overcoming barriers and leveraging facilitators are essential for improvement and require collaboration among stakeholders. Furthermore, research is needed to validate the effectiveness of the recommended solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9041,"journal":{"name":"BMC Veterinary Research","volume":"21 1","pages":"415"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12219032/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"African abattoirs: a scoping review of practices, factors influencing implementation of good practices, and recommended solutions for improvement.\",\"authors\":\"Askale Gizaw Nigussie, Fiona Vande Velde, Edilu Jorga Sarba, Bersissa Kumsa, Sarah Gabriel\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12917-025-04743-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Africa, ongoing challenges posed by zoonotic foodborne diseases highlight the need to improve control practices. This review aims to present a structured overview by summarizing documented practices in African abattoirs, factors influencing the implementation of either poor or good practices, and the recommended solutions to enhance good practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review followed the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, the Arksey and O'Malley methodological framework, and the Population-Concept-Context framework. To identify relevant articles, searches were conducted across the Scopus, PubMed, PubMed Central, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science databases, along with additional records from African Journal Online, Google, and Google Scholar.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 1,547 identified articles, 91 that met the eligibility criteria were included in the final analysis. These studies were conducted in 12 African countries, including Nigeria, Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, Sudan, Cameroon, Morocco, South Africa, Uganda, Tanzania, Egypt, and Sierra Leone. The review identified several poor meat-processing practices, such as a lack of inspections, unhygienic processing, inadequate cleaning, improper meat storage, and poor waste disposal. On the other hand, the current scoping review identified good practices, such as documenting and reporting inspection findings, waste treatment, waste reuse, timely meat delivery, and the reversal of these poor practices. Barriers to good practices were weak policies, lack of basic infrastructure and facilities, insufficient funds, absence of supervision, poor enforcement, poor information flow, lack of knowledge, and inadequate training. Good practices were facilitated by factors like available policy, the establishment and use of critical control points, and basic infrastructure and facilities. Results of the present scoping review also demonstrate that recommended solutions for improvement include following guidelines, developing policies, better enforcement, providing basic infrastructure and facilities, providing training, collaboration, and adopting the One Health approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This scoping review identified a range of poor and good practices and factors that influence the implementation of such practices and recommended improvement solutions. Overcoming barriers and leveraging facilitators are essential for improvement and require collaboration among stakeholders. Furthermore, research is needed to validate the effectiveness of the recommended solutions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Veterinary Research\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"415\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12219032/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Veterinary Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-025-04743-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Veterinary Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-025-04743-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在非洲,人畜共患食源性疾病带来的持续挑战突出了改进控制措施的必要性。本审查的目的是通过总结非洲屠宰场有记录的做法、影响实施不良或良好做法的因素以及建议的加强良好做法的解决办法,提出一个有组织的概述。方法:本综述遵循PRISMA-ScR指南、Arksey和O'Malley方法框架以及人口-概念-环境框架。为了确定相关文章,我们在Scopus、PubMed、PubMed Central、ScienceDirect和Web of Science数据库中进行了搜索,并从African Journal Online、谷歌和谷歌Scholar中进行了额外的记录。结果:在1547篇被鉴定的文章中,91篇符合入选标准的文章被纳入最终分析。这些研究在12个非洲国家进行,包括尼日利亚、埃塞俄比亚、加纳、肯尼亚、苏丹、喀麦隆、摩洛哥、南非、乌干达、坦桑尼亚、埃及和塞拉利昂。审查发现了一些不良的肉类加工做法,如缺乏检查、不卫生的加工、清洁不足、不适当的肉类储存和不良的废物处理。另一方面,当前的范围审查确定了良好的做法,例如记录和报告检查结果、废物处理、废物再利用、及时交付肉类以及扭转这些不良做法。良好做法的障碍是政策薄弱、缺乏基本的基础设施和设施、资金不足、缺乏监督、执法不力、信息流不畅、缺乏知识和培训不足。诸如现有政策、关键控制点的建立和使用以及基本的基础设施和设施等因素促进了良好做法。本范围审查的结果还表明,建议的改进办法包括遵循指导方针、制定政策、加强执法、提供基本基础设施和设施、提供培训、合作以及采用“同一个健康”方针。结论:该范围审查确定了一系列不良和良好做法以及影响这些做法实施的因素,并建议了改进解决方案。克服障碍和利用促进者对改进至关重要,需要利益攸关方之间的合作。此外,还需要进行研究以验证所建议的解决方案的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

African abattoirs: a scoping review of practices, factors influencing implementation of good practices, and recommended solutions for improvement.

African abattoirs: a scoping review of practices, factors influencing implementation of good practices, and recommended solutions for improvement.

African abattoirs: a scoping review of practices, factors influencing implementation of good practices, and recommended solutions for improvement.

African abattoirs: a scoping review of practices, factors influencing implementation of good practices, and recommended solutions for improvement.

Background: In Africa, ongoing challenges posed by zoonotic foodborne diseases highlight the need to improve control practices. This review aims to present a structured overview by summarizing documented practices in African abattoirs, factors influencing the implementation of either poor or good practices, and the recommended solutions to enhance good practices.

Methods: This scoping review followed the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, the Arksey and O'Malley methodological framework, and the Population-Concept-Context framework. To identify relevant articles, searches were conducted across the Scopus, PubMed, PubMed Central, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science databases, along with additional records from African Journal Online, Google, and Google Scholar.

Results: Out of 1,547 identified articles, 91 that met the eligibility criteria were included in the final analysis. These studies were conducted in 12 African countries, including Nigeria, Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, Sudan, Cameroon, Morocco, South Africa, Uganda, Tanzania, Egypt, and Sierra Leone. The review identified several poor meat-processing practices, such as a lack of inspections, unhygienic processing, inadequate cleaning, improper meat storage, and poor waste disposal. On the other hand, the current scoping review identified good practices, such as documenting and reporting inspection findings, waste treatment, waste reuse, timely meat delivery, and the reversal of these poor practices. Barriers to good practices were weak policies, lack of basic infrastructure and facilities, insufficient funds, absence of supervision, poor enforcement, poor information flow, lack of knowledge, and inadequate training. Good practices were facilitated by factors like available policy, the establishment and use of critical control points, and basic infrastructure and facilities. Results of the present scoping review also demonstrate that recommended solutions for improvement include following guidelines, developing policies, better enforcement, providing basic infrastructure and facilities, providing training, collaboration, and adopting the One Health approach.

Conclusions: This scoping review identified a range of poor and good practices and factors that influence the implementation of such practices and recommended improvement solutions. Overcoming barriers and leveraging facilitators are essential for improvement and require collaboration among stakeholders. Furthermore, research is needed to validate the effectiveness of the recommended solutions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Veterinary Research
BMC Veterinary Research VETERINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
420
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Veterinary Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of veterinary science and medicine, including the epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention and treatment of medical conditions of domestic, companion, farm and wild animals, as well as the biomedical processes that underlie their health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信