不同非自杀性自伤方法的互联性——一个网络分析。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Melinda Reinhardt, Kenneth G Rice, Hunggu Cho, Zsolt Horváth
{"title":"不同非自杀性自伤方法的互联性——一个网络分析。","authors":"Melinda Reinhardt, Kenneth G Rice, Hunggu Cho, Zsolt Horváth","doi":"10.1186/s12888-025-07045-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An important indicator of self-harm severity is the co-occurrence of different nonsuicidal self-injurious (NSSI) behaviors. However, there is little research on how different self-injurious behaviors (e.g., cutting, biting, burning, carving) are related. In contrast to person-centred approaches, variable-centred network analysis helps to identify the most meaningful associations between different forms of NSSI behavior, thus allowing the identification of structural patterns in different NSSI methods. Based on network analysis, it will be possible to examine which NSSI methods are the most central and which are most closely linked to other methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used network analysis to investigate interconnections between 12 different self-harm methods. The Inventory of Statements About Self-Injury [24] was utilized to assess the types and frequency of NSSI in a community adult sample.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>More than one-third (39.7%; n = 744) of 1873 adults reported at least one episode of NSSI in their lifetime. Most (77%) of those engaged in NSSI used more than one NSSI method. The most frequently used NSSI methods were hitting self, interfering with wound healing, pinching, biting, and severe scratching. In the NSSI methods network analysis, severe scratching, cutting, and pinching had the highest rates of interrelationship with other NSSI behaviors. Moreover, the interconnectedness of certain specific NSSI-methods (i.e., cutting with burning and carving; severe scratching with pinching, biting and hitting self) have a greater risk of co-occurrence (versatility).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although different NSSI methods occurred as distinct entities, some play a more central role in the network. Our results suggest that the NSSI methods identified as central should be given more attention in clinical settings as these behaviors may indicate the severity of the condition. Specifically, when assessing and treating those who engage in self-harm, clinicians may find it useful to create a detailed map of the person-specific NSSI-methods to inform risk assessment and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9029,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychiatry","volume":"25 1","pages":"601"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interconnectivity among different nonsuicidal self-injurious methods - a network analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Melinda Reinhardt, Kenneth G Rice, Hunggu Cho, Zsolt Horváth\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12888-025-07045-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An important indicator of self-harm severity is the co-occurrence of different nonsuicidal self-injurious (NSSI) behaviors. However, there is little research on how different self-injurious behaviors (e.g., cutting, biting, burning, carving) are related. In contrast to person-centred approaches, variable-centred network analysis helps to identify the most meaningful associations between different forms of NSSI behavior, thus allowing the identification of structural patterns in different NSSI methods. Based on network analysis, it will be possible to examine which NSSI methods are the most central and which are most closely linked to other methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used network analysis to investigate interconnections between 12 different self-harm methods. The Inventory of Statements About Self-Injury [24] was utilized to assess the types and frequency of NSSI in a community adult sample.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>More than one-third (39.7%; n = 744) of 1873 adults reported at least one episode of NSSI in their lifetime. Most (77%) of those engaged in NSSI used more than one NSSI method. The most frequently used NSSI methods were hitting self, interfering with wound healing, pinching, biting, and severe scratching. In the NSSI methods network analysis, severe scratching, cutting, and pinching had the highest rates of interrelationship with other NSSI behaviors. Moreover, the interconnectedness of certain specific NSSI-methods (i.e., cutting with burning and carving; severe scratching with pinching, biting and hitting self) have a greater risk of co-occurrence (versatility).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although different NSSI methods occurred as distinct entities, some play a more central role in the network. Our results suggest that the NSSI methods identified as central should be given more attention in clinical settings as these behaviors may indicate the severity of the condition. Specifically, when assessing and treating those who engage in self-harm, clinicians may find it useful to create a detailed map of the person-specific NSSI-methods to inform risk assessment and treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"601\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-07045-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-07045-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:不同非自杀性自伤行为的共同发生是自伤严重程度的一个重要指标。然而,关于不同的自伤行为(如切割、咬、烧、雕刻)之间的关系的研究很少。与以人为中心的方法相比,以变量为中心的网络分析有助于识别不同形式的自伤行为之间最有意义的联系,从而可以识别不同自伤方法中的结构模式。基于网络分析,将有可能检查哪些自伤方法是最核心的,哪些与其他方法联系最紧密。方法采用网络分析方法研究12种不同自残方式之间的相互联系。采用自伤陈述量表([24])对社区成人自伤的类型和频率进行评估。结果:超过三分之一(39.7%);(n = 744) 1873名成人中至少报告过一次自伤。大多数(77%)从事自伤的人使用了一种以上的自伤方法。最常用的自伤方式为自打、干扰伤口愈合、掐、咬、严重抓伤。在自伤方法网络分析中,严重的划伤、割伤和捏伤与其他自伤行为的相关性最高。此外,某些特定的自伤方法(即燃烧和雕刻切割;严重的抓伤(掐、咬和打自己)有更大的共发风险(多功能性)。结论:尽管不同的自伤方式作为不同的实体出现,但有些在网络中起着更重要的作用。我们的研究结果表明,在临床环境中,被认为是核心的自伤方法应该得到更多的关注,因为这些行为可能表明病情的严重程度。具体来说,当评估和治疗那些有自残行为的人时,临床医生可能会发现,创建一个详细的个人特定的自残行为地图是很有用的——为风险评估和治疗提供信息的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interconnectivity among different nonsuicidal self-injurious methods - a network analysis.

Background: An important indicator of self-harm severity is the co-occurrence of different nonsuicidal self-injurious (NSSI) behaviors. However, there is little research on how different self-injurious behaviors (e.g., cutting, biting, burning, carving) are related. In contrast to person-centred approaches, variable-centred network analysis helps to identify the most meaningful associations between different forms of NSSI behavior, thus allowing the identification of structural patterns in different NSSI methods. Based on network analysis, it will be possible to examine which NSSI methods are the most central and which are most closely linked to other methods.

Methods: We used network analysis to investigate interconnections between 12 different self-harm methods. The Inventory of Statements About Self-Injury [24] was utilized to assess the types and frequency of NSSI in a community adult sample.

Results: More than one-third (39.7%; n = 744) of 1873 adults reported at least one episode of NSSI in their lifetime. Most (77%) of those engaged in NSSI used more than one NSSI method. The most frequently used NSSI methods were hitting self, interfering with wound healing, pinching, biting, and severe scratching. In the NSSI methods network analysis, severe scratching, cutting, and pinching had the highest rates of interrelationship with other NSSI behaviors. Moreover, the interconnectedness of certain specific NSSI-methods (i.e., cutting with burning and carving; severe scratching with pinching, biting and hitting self) have a greater risk of co-occurrence (versatility).

Conclusions: Although different NSSI methods occurred as distinct entities, some play a more central role in the network. Our results suggest that the NSSI methods identified as central should be given more attention in clinical settings as these behaviors may indicate the severity of the condition. Specifically, when assessing and treating those who engage in self-harm, clinicians may find it useful to create a detailed map of the person-specific NSSI-methods to inform risk assessment and treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Psychiatry
BMC Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychiatry is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of psychiatric disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信