自2017年《精神卫生保健法》实施以来,印度ECT服务的变化:临床医生的观点。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Preeti Sinha, Vanteemar S Sreeraj, Shyam Sundar Arumugham, Jagadisha Thirthalli
{"title":"自2017年《精神卫生保健法》实施以来,印度ECT服务的变化:临床医生的观点。","authors":"Preeti Sinha, Vanteemar S Sreeraj, Shyam Sundar Arumugham, Jagadisha Thirthalli","doi":"10.1186/s12888-025-07109-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The large treatment gap in mental disorders in India also includes a lack of access to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), a potentially lifesaving treatment. With the introduction of the Mental Health Care Act (MHCA) 2017 in India, an impact was speculated on the utilisation of ECT due to the ban on unmodified ECT and the regularisation of ECTs in children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We planned this survey to identify the current status of ECT services in India as perceived by psychiatrists and to explore the barriers to providing ECT, particularly those influenced by the enactment of the MHCA 2017 in India. The psychiatrists practising in India were invited to complete an online questionnaire distributed through social media and professional group forums. A total of 225 consenting participants completed the survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A majority of the participating psychiatrists (n = 160; 71.11%) were from urban areas, and 102 (45.33%) worked in private hospitals. Approximately half of the respondents (n = 118; 52.44%) could provide ECT to less than a quarter of patients for whom ECT was recommended. Furthermore, 52.4% of psychiatrists (n = 118) reported a decrease in the number of patients receiving ECT following post MHCA 2017 in India, while 44.9% (n = 101) observed no change. Additionally, 114 psychiatrists (50.67%) noted a reduction in the use of ECT for children since MHCA 2017. A substantial proportion (78.22%; n = 176) regarded patient refusal of consent as a significant factor. Access to anaesthesia services and associated costs was identified as a major barrier by 59.1% of psychiatrists (n = 133), significantly influencing their opinion on the reduction of ECT services post-MHCA 2017 (Odds ratio = 2.024, p = 0.018).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The limited availability of anaesthesia services and associated expenses are significant barriers to using ECT in developing countries such as India. This issue became more pronounced after the implementation of the MHCA 2017 and should be addressed promptly. Training psychiatrists in ECT anaesthetic skills via task-sharing and telementoring can help resolve this issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":9029,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychiatry","volume":"25 1","pages":"670"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in ECT services in India since the implementation of its mental health care act 2017: a clinician's perspective.\",\"authors\":\"Preeti Sinha, Vanteemar S Sreeraj, Shyam Sundar Arumugham, Jagadisha Thirthalli\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12888-025-07109-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The large treatment gap in mental disorders in India also includes a lack of access to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), a potentially lifesaving treatment. With the introduction of the Mental Health Care Act (MHCA) 2017 in India, an impact was speculated on the utilisation of ECT due to the ban on unmodified ECT and the regularisation of ECTs in children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We planned this survey to identify the current status of ECT services in India as perceived by psychiatrists and to explore the barriers to providing ECT, particularly those influenced by the enactment of the MHCA 2017 in India. The psychiatrists practising in India were invited to complete an online questionnaire distributed through social media and professional group forums. A total of 225 consenting participants completed the survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A majority of the participating psychiatrists (n = 160; 71.11%) were from urban areas, and 102 (45.33%) worked in private hospitals. Approximately half of the respondents (n = 118; 52.44%) could provide ECT to less than a quarter of patients for whom ECT was recommended. Furthermore, 52.4% of psychiatrists (n = 118) reported a decrease in the number of patients receiving ECT following post MHCA 2017 in India, while 44.9% (n = 101) observed no change. Additionally, 114 psychiatrists (50.67%) noted a reduction in the use of ECT for children since MHCA 2017. A substantial proportion (78.22%; n = 176) regarded patient refusal of consent as a significant factor. Access to anaesthesia services and associated costs was identified as a major barrier by 59.1% of psychiatrists (n = 133), significantly influencing their opinion on the reduction of ECT services post-MHCA 2017 (Odds ratio = 2.024, p = 0.018).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The limited availability of anaesthesia services and associated expenses are significant barriers to using ECT in developing countries such as India. This issue became more pronounced after the implementation of the MHCA 2017 and should be addressed promptly. Training psychiatrists in ECT anaesthetic skills via task-sharing and telementoring can help resolve this issue.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"670\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-07109-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-07109-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:印度精神障碍的巨大治疗差距还包括缺乏电休克治疗(ECT),这是一种可能挽救生命的治疗方法。随着2017年印度《精神卫生保健法》(MHCA)的出台,由于禁止未经修改的ECT和儿童ECT的规范化,人们推测ECT的使用会受到影响。方法:我们计划进行本次调查,以确定精神科医生认为印度ECT服务的现状,并探索提供ECT的障碍,特别是受印度MHCA 2017颁布影响的障碍。邀请在印度执业的精神科医生完成一份通过社交媒体和专业小组论坛分发的在线问卷。共有225名同意的参与者完成了这项调查。结果:大多数参与的精神科医生(n = 160;71.11%)来自城市,102人(45.33%)在私立医院工作。大约一半的受访者(n = 118;52.44%)能提供电痉挛治疗的患者不到四分之一。此外,52.4%的精神科医生(n = 118)报告印度MHCA 2017后接受ECT的患者数量减少,而44.9% (n = 101)没有观察到变化。此外,114名精神科医生(50.67%)指出,自2017年MHCA以来,儿童电痉挛疗法的使用有所减少。相当大的比例(78.22%;N = 176)认为患者拒绝同意是显著因素。59.1%的精神科医生(n = 133)认为获得麻醉服务和相关费用是主要障碍,这显著影响了他们对mhca 2017后减少ECT服务的看法(优势比= 2.024,p = 0.018)。结论:麻醉服务的有限可用性和相关费用是在印度等发展中国家使用电痉挛疗法的重大障碍。在MHCA 2017实施后,这一问题变得更加明显,应及时解决。通过任务共享和远程监控对精神科医生进行ECT麻醉技能培训可以帮助解决这个问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Changes in ECT services in India since the implementation of its mental health care act 2017: a clinician's perspective.

Background: The large treatment gap in mental disorders in India also includes a lack of access to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), a potentially lifesaving treatment. With the introduction of the Mental Health Care Act (MHCA) 2017 in India, an impact was speculated on the utilisation of ECT due to the ban on unmodified ECT and the regularisation of ECTs in children.

Methods: We planned this survey to identify the current status of ECT services in India as perceived by psychiatrists and to explore the barriers to providing ECT, particularly those influenced by the enactment of the MHCA 2017 in India. The psychiatrists practising in India were invited to complete an online questionnaire distributed through social media and professional group forums. A total of 225 consenting participants completed the survey.

Results: A majority of the participating psychiatrists (n = 160; 71.11%) were from urban areas, and 102 (45.33%) worked in private hospitals. Approximately half of the respondents (n = 118; 52.44%) could provide ECT to less than a quarter of patients for whom ECT was recommended. Furthermore, 52.4% of psychiatrists (n = 118) reported a decrease in the number of patients receiving ECT following post MHCA 2017 in India, while 44.9% (n = 101) observed no change. Additionally, 114 psychiatrists (50.67%) noted a reduction in the use of ECT for children since MHCA 2017. A substantial proportion (78.22%; n = 176) regarded patient refusal of consent as a significant factor. Access to anaesthesia services and associated costs was identified as a major barrier by 59.1% of psychiatrists (n = 133), significantly influencing their opinion on the reduction of ECT services post-MHCA 2017 (Odds ratio = 2.024, p = 0.018).

Conclusions: The limited availability of anaesthesia services and associated expenses are significant barriers to using ECT in developing countries such as India. This issue became more pronounced after the implementation of the MHCA 2017 and should be addressed promptly. Training psychiatrists in ECT anaesthetic skills via task-sharing and telementoring can help resolve this issue.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Psychiatry
BMC Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychiatry is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of psychiatric disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信