基于术前mri的直肠癌深度学习重建与分类模型。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Yuan Yuan, Shengnan Ren, Haidi Lu, Fangying Chen, Lei Xiang, Ryan Chamberlain, Chengwei Shao, Jianping Lu, Fu Shen, Luguang Chen
{"title":"基于术前mri的直肠癌深度学习重建与分类模型。","authors":"Yuan Yuan, Shengnan Ren, Haidi Lu, Fangying Chen, Lei Xiang, Ryan Chamberlain, Chengwei Shao, Jianping Lu, Fu Shen, Luguang Chen","doi":"10.1186/s12880-025-01775-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To determine whether deep learning reconstruction (DLR) could improve the image quality of rectal MR images, and to explore the discrimination of the TN stage of rectal cancer by different readers and deep learning classification models, compared with conventional MR images without DLR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Images of high-resolution T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (CE-T1WI) from patients with pathologically diagnosed rectal cancer were retrospectively processed with and without DLR and assessed by five readers. The first two readers measured the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the lesions. The overall image quality and lesion display performance for each sequence with and without DLR were independently scored using a five-point scale, and the TN stage of rectal cancer lesions was evaluated by the other three readers. Fifty of the patients were randomly selected to further make a comparison between DLR and traditional denoising filter. Deep learning classification models were developed and compared for the TN stage. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the proposed model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 178 patients were evaluated. The SNR and CNR of the lesion on images with DLR were significantly higher than those without DLR, for T2WI, DWI and CE-T1WI, respectively (p < 0.0001). A significant difference was observed in overall image quality and lesion display performance between images with and without DLR (p < 0.0001). The image quality scores, SNR, and CNR values of DLR image set were significantly larger than those of original and filter enhancement image sets (all p values < 0.05) for all the three sequences, respectively. The deep learning classification models with DLR achieved good discrimination of the TN stage, with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.937 (95% CI 0.839-0.977) and 0.824 (95% CI 0.684-0.913) in the test sets, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Deep learning reconstruction and classification models could improve the image quality of rectal MRI images and enhance the diagnostic performance for determining the TN stage of patients with rectal cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":9020,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Imaging","volume":"25 1","pages":"259"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preoperative MRI-based deep learning reconstruction and classification model for assessing rectal cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Yuan Yuan, Shengnan Ren, Haidi Lu, Fangying Chen, Lei Xiang, Ryan Chamberlain, Chengwei Shao, Jianping Lu, Fu Shen, Luguang Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12880-025-01775-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To determine whether deep learning reconstruction (DLR) could improve the image quality of rectal MR images, and to explore the discrimination of the TN stage of rectal cancer by different readers and deep learning classification models, compared with conventional MR images without DLR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Images of high-resolution T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (CE-T1WI) from patients with pathologically diagnosed rectal cancer were retrospectively processed with and without DLR and assessed by five readers. The first two readers measured the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the lesions. The overall image quality and lesion display performance for each sequence with and without DLR were independently scored using a five-point scale, and the TN stage of rectal cancer lesions was evaluated by the other three readers. Fifty of the patients were randomly selected to further make a comparison between DLR and traditional denoising filter. Deep learning classification models were developed and compared for the TN stage. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the proposed model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 178 patients were evaluated. The SNR and CNR of the lesion on images with DLR were significantly higher than those without DLR, for T2WI, DWI and CE-T1WI, respectively (p < 0.0001). A significant difference was observed in overall image quality and lesion display performance between images with and without DLR (p < 0.0001). The image quality scores, SNR, and CNR values of DLR image set were significantly larger than those of original and filter enhancement image sets (all p values < 0.05) for all the three sequences, respectively. The deep learning classification models with DLR achieved good discrimination of the TN stage, with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.937 (95% CI 0.839-0.977) and 0.824 (95% CI 0.684-0.913) in the test sets, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Deep learning reconstruction and classification models could improve the image quality of rectal MRI images and enhance the diagnostic performance for determining the TN stage of patients with rectal cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9020,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Imaging\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"259\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-025-01775-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-025-01775-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:确定深度学习重建(deep learning reconstruction, DLR)是否能够提高直肠MR图像的图像质量,并与常规MR图像进行对比,探讨不同读卡器和深度学习分类模型对直肠癌TN期的区分。方法:回顾性处理病理诊断为直肠癌患者的高分辨率t2加权、弥散加权成像(DWI)和增强t1加权成像(CE-T1WI)图像,并由5位读者进行评估。前两个读卡器测量病变的信噪比(SNR)和噪声对比比(CNR)。采用5分制对有DLR和没有DLR的各序列的整体图像质量和病变显示性能进行独立评分,并由另外3位读者对直肠癌病变的TN分期进行评估。随机抽取50例患者进行DLR与传统去噪滤波的比较。为TN阶段开发并比较了深度学习分类模型。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析和决策曲线分析(DCA)对模型的诊断性能进行评价。结果:总共评估了178例患者。T2WI、DWI、CE-T1WI病变的信噪比、CNR分别显著高于无DLR的T2WI、DWI (p)结论:深度学习重建和分类模型可以改善直肠MRI图像的图像质量,提高直肠癌患者TN分期的诊断效能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preoperative MRI-based deep learning reconstruction and classification model for assessing rectal cancer.

Background: To determine whether deep learning reconstruction (DLR) could improve the image quality of rectal MR images, and to explore the discrimination of the TN stage of rectal cancer by different readers and deep learning classification models, compared with conventional MR images without DLR.

Methods: Images of high-resolution T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (CE-T1WI) from patients with pathologically diagnosed rectal cancer were retrospectively processed with and without DLR and assessed by five readers. The first two readers measured the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the lesions. The overall image quality and lesion display performance for each sequence with and without DLR were independently scored using a five-point scale, and the TN stage of rectal cancer lesions was evaluated by the other three readers. Fifty of the patients were randomly selected to further make a comparison between DLR and traditional denoising filter. Deep learning classification models were developed and compared for the TN stage. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the proposed model.

Results: Overall, 178 patients were evaluated. The SNR and CNR of the lesion on images with DLR were significantly higher than those without DLR, for T2WI, DWI and CE-T1WI, respectively (p < 0.0001). A significant difference was observed in overall image quality and lesion display performance between images with and without DLR (p < 0.0001). The image quality scores, SNR, and CNR values of DLR image set were significantly larger than those of original and filter enhancement image sets (all p values < 0.05) for all the three sequences, respectively. The deep learning classification models with DLR achieved good discrimination of the TN stage, with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.937 (95% CI 0.839-0.977) and 0.824 (95% CI 0.684-0.913) in the test sets, respectively.

Conclusion: Deep learning reconstruction and classification models could improve the image quality of rectal MRI images and enhance the diagnostic performance for determining the TN stage of patients with rectal cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Imaging
BMC Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
198
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Imaging is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the development, evaluation, and use of imaging techniques and image processing tools to diagnose and manage disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信