盐酸氨溴索吸入治疗下呼吸道感染性疾病的疗效和安全性:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的多中心临床试验

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Di Wu, Xiuhua Fu, Faguang Jin, Hui Li, Zhiqiang Qin, Haoyan Wang, Hongmei Yue, Jie Zhang, Zhaolong Cao
{"title":"盐酸氨溴索吸入治疗下呼吸道感染性疾病的疗效和安全性:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的多中心临床试验","authors":"Di Wu, Xiuhua Fu, Faguang Jin, Hui Li, Zhiqiang Qin, Haoyan Wang, Hongmei Yue, Jie Zhang, Zhaolong Cao","doi":"10.1186/s12879-025-11194-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ambroxol is a widely used mucoactive agent, but the efficacy of inhaled ambroxol in patients with lower respiratory tract infectious (LRTI) disease is poorly understood. This trial aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of inhaled ambroxol with those of placebo in patients with LRTI diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre clinical trial, 240 patients with LRTI diseases were randomized to receive inhaled ambroxol hydrochloride solution (ambroxol group, N = 120) or placebo (placebo group, N = 120) twice daily for 7 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the placebo group, the ambroxol group had lower sputum trait scores and greater changes in sputum trait scores from Day 2 to Day 8. Compared with the placebo group, the ambroxol group presented lower expectoration difficulty scores and greater changes in expectoration difficulty scores on Days 2, 3, and 6. The sputum volume scores on Days 6, 7, and 8 were lower in the ambroxol group than in the placebo group, but the change in the sputum volume score was not different between the groups. Compared with the placebo group, the ambroxol group had lower cough scores on Days 3, 5, 6, and 7, as well as greater changes in cough scores on Days 2, 3, and 5. The incidences of adverse events (10.8% versus 6.7%), serious adverse events (0.8% versus 0.0%), and adverse reactions (4.2% versus 3.3%) were not different between the ambroxol group and the placebo group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Inhaled ambroxol is better at ameliorating respiratory symptoms and has comparable safety to placebo in patients with LRTI diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":8981,"journal":{"name":"BMC Infectious Diseases","volume":"25 1","pages":"830"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12211132/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of inhaled ambroxol hydrochloride solution in patients with lower respiratory tract infectious diseases: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Di Wu, Xiuhua Fu, Faguang Jin, Hui Li, Zhiqiang Qin, Haoyan Wang, Hongmei Yue, Jie Zhang, Zhaolong Cao\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12879-025-11194-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ambroxol is a widely used mucoactive agent, but the efficacy of inhaled ambroxol in patients with lower respiratory tract infectious (LRTI) disease is poorly understood. This trial aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of inhaled ambroxol with those of placebo in patients with LRTI diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre clinical trial, 240 patients with LRTI diseases were randomized to receive inhaled ambroxol hydrochloride solution (ambroxol group, N = 120) or placebo (placebo group, N = 120) twice daily for 7 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the placebo group, the ambroxol group had lower sputum trait scores and greater changes in sputum trait scores from Day 2 to Day 8. Compared with the placebo group, the ambroxol group presented lower expectoration difficulty scores and greater changes in expectoration difficulty scores on Days 2, 3, and 6. The sputum volume scores on Days 6, 7, and 8 were lower in the ambroxol group than in the placebo group, but the change in the sputum volume score was not different between the groups. Compared with the placebo group, the ambroxol group had lower cough scores on Days 3, 5, 6, and 7, as well as greater changes in cough scores on Days 2, 3, and 5. The incidences of adverse events (10.8% versus 6.7%), serious adverse events (0.8% versus 0.0%), and adverse reactions (4.2% versus 3.3%) were not different between the ambroxol group and the placebo group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Inhaled ambroxol is better at ameliorating respiratory symptoms and has comparable safety to placebo in patients with LRTI diseases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8981,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"830\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12211132/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-025-11194-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-025-11194-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:氨溴索是一种广泛使用的粘膜活性药物,但吸入氨溴索治疗下呼吸道感染性疾病的疗效尚不清楚。本试验旨在比较吸入氨溴索与安慰剂对下呼吸道感染患者的疗效和安全性。方法:在这项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心临床试验中,240例LRTI疾病患者随机接受吸入盐酸氨溴索溶液(氨溴索组,N = 120)或安慰剂(安慰剂组,N = 120)治疗,每日2次,连续7天。结果:与安慰剂组相比,氨溴索组的痰性状评分较低,第2天至第8天的痰性状评分变化较大。与安慰剂组相比,氨溴索组在第2、3、6天的咳痰困难评分较低,咳痰困难评分变化较大。在第6、7、8天,氨溴索组的痰量评分低于安慰剂组,但两组间痰量评分的变化无差异。与安慰剂组相比,氨溴索组在第3、5、6和7天的咳嗽评分较低,而在第2、3和5天的咳嗽评分变化较大。不良事件发生率(10.8%对6.7%)、严重不良事件发生率(0.8%对0.0%)和不良反应发生率(4.2%对3.3%)在氨溴索组和安慰剂组之间没有差异。结论:对于下呼吸道感染患者,吸入氨溴索能更好地改善呼吸道症状,其安全性与安慰剂相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and safety of inhaled ambroxol hydrochloride solution in patients with lower respiratory tract infectious diseases: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre clinical trial.

Background: Ambroxol is a widely used mucoactive agent, but the efficacy of inhaled ambroxol in patients with lower respiratory tract infectious (LRTI) disease is poorly understood. This trial aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of inhaled ambroxol with those of placebo in patients with LRTI diseases.

Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre clinical trial, 240 patients with LRTI diseases were randomized to receive inhaled ambroxol hydrochloride solution (ambroxol group, N = 120) or placebo (placebo group, N = 120) twice daily for 7 days.

Results: Compared with the placebo group, the ambroxol group had lower sputum trait scores and greater changes in sputum trait scores from Day 2 to Day 8. Compared with the placebo group, the ambroxol group presented lower expectoration difficulty scores and greater changes in expectoration difficulty scores on Days 2, 3, and 6. The sputum volume scores on Days 6, 7, and 8 were lower in the ambroxol group than in the placebo group, but the change in the sputum volume score was not different between the groups. Compared with the placebo group, the ambroxol group had lower cough scores on Days 3, 5, 6, and 7, as well as greater changes in cough scores on Days 2, 3, and 5. The incidences of adverse events (10.8% versus 6.7%), serious adverse events (0.8% versus 0.0%), and adverse reactions (4.2% versus 3.3%) were not different between the ambroxol group and the placebo group.

Conclusions: Inhaled ambroxol is better at ameliorating respiratory symptoms and has comparable safety to placebo in patients with LRTI diseases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Infectious Diseases
BMC Infectious Diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
860
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: BMC Infectious Diseases is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of infectious and sexually transmitted diseases in humans, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信