基于立体眼动追踪技术的注视和收敛精度验证研究。

IF 3.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Arthur R Pijpaert, H H L M Jeroen Goossens, Bob W van Dijk, L J Bert Roetman, Ruth M A van Nispen, Laurentius J René van Rijn
{"title":"基于立体眼动追踪技术的注视和收敛精度验证研究。","authors":"Arthur R Pijpaert, H H L M Jeroen Goossens, Bob W van Dijk, L J Bert Roetman, Ruth M A van Nispen, Laurentius J René van Rijn","doi":"10.3758/s13428-025-02731-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Binocular video-based eye-tracking allows for gaze and vergence measurements, but the accuracy and precision of vergence are barely addressed. Here, we investigate the accuracy and precision of both gaze and vergence measurements using a stereoscopic eye-tracking system. Previous studies have evaluated stereoscopic eye-trackers for gaze eccentricities up to 16°. We validated a custom-built stereoscopic eye-tracker with two cameras and two infrared light sources for gaze eccentricities up to 21°. Additionally, we studied the impact of fixation distance and pupil size on vergence accuracy. Participants with normal binocular vision (N = 8) performed fixation tasks, enabling the assessment of both gaze and vergence errors. The stereoscopic system provided gaze estimates with a mean absolute error (MAE) of less than 1° within the central visual field. However, the accuracy decreased for peripheral angles larger than 14°. We found a MAE of 0.89 ± 0.58° in measuring vergence and a strong linear association between target vergence and measured vergence, with a slope of 0.99 ± 0.05. In contrast to previous studies using single-camera eye-trackers, we found no systematic influence of pupil size on the vergence measurements. Although there was high agreement between estimated and ground truth vergence in the central field, the system did struggle to maintain accuracy at larger eccentricities. This limitation arises primarily from the loss of reliable glints rather than technical constraints, indicating the need for alternative approaches to enhance accuracy in wider fields of view.</p>","PeriodicalId":8717,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Research Methods","volume":"57 8","pages":"214"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12213999/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A validation study on the accuracy and precision of gaze and vergence using stereoscopic eye-tracking technology.\",\"authors\":\"Arthur R Pijpaert, H H L M Jeroen Goossens, Bob W van Dijk, L J Bert Roetman, Ruth M A van Nispen, Laurentius J René van Rijn\",\"doi\":\"10.3758/s13428-025-02731-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Binocular video-based eye-tracking allows for gaze and vergence measurements, but the accuracy and precision of vergence are barely addressed. Here, we investigate the accuracy and precision of both gaze and vergence measurements using a stereoscopic eye-tracking system. Previous studies have evaluated stereoscopic eye-trackers for gaze eccentricities up to 16°. We validated a custom-built stereoscopic eye-tracker with two cameras and two infrared light sources for gaze eccentricities up to 21°. Additionally, we studied the impact of fixation distance and pupil size on vergence accuracy. Participants with normal binocular vision (N = 8) performed fixation tasks, enabling the assessment of both gaze and vergence errors. The stereoscopic system provided gaze estimates with a mean absolute error (MAE) of less than 1° within the central visual field. However, the accuracy decreased for peripheral angles larger than 14°. We found a MAE of 0.89 ± 0.58° in measuring vergence and a strong linear association between target vergence and measured vergence, with a slope of 0.99 ± 0.05. In contrast to previous studies using single-camera eye-trackers, we found no systematic influence of pupil size on the vergence measurements. Although there was high agreement between estimated and ground truth vergence in the central field, the system did struggle to maintain accuracy at larger eccentricities. This limitation arises primarily from the loss of reliable glints rather than technical constraints, indicating the need for alternative approaches to enhance accuracy in wider fields of view.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavior Research Methods\",\"volume\":\"57 8\",\"pages\":\"214\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12213999/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavior Research Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-025-02731-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Research Methods","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-025-02731-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

双目视频为基础的眼球追踪允许凝视和收敛测量,但收敛的准确性和精度几乎没有解决。在这里,我们研究了使用立体眼动追踪系统测量凝视和收敛的准确性和精度。先前的研究已经评估了立体眼动仪的凝视偏心率高达16°。我们验证了一个定制的带有两个摄像头和两个红外光源的立体眼动仪,其凝视偏心率高达21°。此外,我们还研究了注视距离和瞳孔大小对聚光精度的影响。双眼视力正常的参与者(N = 8)执行注视任务,能够评估凝视和聚光误差。立体系统提供的注视估计在中心视野内的平均绝对误差(MAE)小于1°。然而,当周边角度大于14°时,精度下降。我们发现,测量辐角的MAE为0.89±0.58°,目标辐角与测量辐角之间存在较强的线性关系,斜率为0.99±0.05。与先前使用单摄像头眼动仪的研究相比,我们发现瞳孔大小对散度测量没有系统的影响。虽然在中心场的估计和地面真值收敛度之间有很高的一致性,但系统确实难以在较大的偏心处保持精度。这种限制主要是由于失去了可靠的闪烁,而不是技术上的限制,这表明需要其他方法来提高更大视场的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A validation study on the accuracy and precision of gaze and vergence using stereoscopic eye-tracking technology.

Binocular video-based eye-tracking allows for gaze and vergence measurements, but the accuracy and precision of vergence are barely addressed. Here, we investigate the accuracy and precision of both gaze and vergence measurements using a stereoscopic eye-tracking system. Previous studies have evaluated stereoscopic eye-trackers for gaze eccentricities up to 16°. We validated a custom-built stereoscopic eye-tracker with two cameras and two infrared light sources for gaze eccentricities up to 21°. Additionally, we studied the impact of fixation distance and pupil size on vergence accuracy. Participants with normal binocular vision (N = 8) performed fixation tasks, enabling the assessment of both gaze and vergence errors. The stereoscopic system provided gaze estimates with a mean absolute error (MAE) of less than 1° within the central visual field. However, the accuracy decreased for peripheral angles larger than 14°. We found a MAE of 0.89 ± 0.58° in measuring vergence and a strong linear association between target vergence and measured vergence, with a slope of 0.99 ± 0.05. In contrast to previous studies using single-camera eye-trackers, we found no systematic influence of pupil size on the vergence measurements. Although there was high agreement between estimated and ground truth vergence in the central field, the system did struggle to maintain accuracy at larger eccentricities. This limitation arises primarily from the loss of reliable glints rather than technical constraints, indicating the need for alternative approaches to enhance accuracy in wider fields of view.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.30%
发文量
266
期刊介绍: Behavior Research Methods publishes articles concerned with the methods, techniques, and instrumentation of research in experimental psychology. The journal focuses particularly on the use of computer technology in psychological research. An annual special issue is devoted to this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信