Ali Kiadaliri, L Stefan Lohmander, Amanda E Nelson, Leif E Dahlberg
{"title":"在所有症状状态亚组中,可接受症状状态的比例几乎增加了两倍,患者报告的结果有所改善:一项对超过15,000名骨关节炎患者进行数字教育和运动治疗的登记研究。","authors":"Ali Kiadaliri, L Stefan Lohmander, Amanda E Nelson, Leif E Dahlberg","doi":"10.1002/acr.25594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated trajectories of patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) among participants of digital education and exercise therapy for knee and hip osteoarthritis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A longitudinal observational study among individuals aged at least 40 years who participated in the digital program. Participants completed PASS (yes/no) at enrollment and at least one follow-up during 1 year after enrollment (N = 15,253). Group-based trajectory modeling was used to identify groups with distinct PASS trajectories. We used multinomial logistic regression and linear random intercept models to explore predictors and compare changes in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) across trajectory subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of participants reporting acceptable symptom state rose from 17.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 16.8%-18.1%) at enrollment to 42.4% (95% CI 41.6%-43.1%) and 48.9% (95% CI 47.5%-50.2%) at 3- and 12-month follow-ups, respectively. We identified four PASS trajectories: (1) \"persistently not achieving PASS\" (PNAP) (45.1%), (2) \"early sustained PASS\" (ESP) (34.8%), (3) \"gradually increasing satisfaction\" (GIS) (10.8%), and (4) \"early PASS, later unacceptable PASS\" (9.3%). Among baseline variables, female sex, older age, nonmetropolitan residence, lower education, knee osteoarthritis, fear of movement, no walking difficulties, no wish for surgery, and better PROMs were generally associated with higher odds of following trajectories other than the PNAP. All trajectories experienced improvements in PROMs, with generally larger improvements in the ESP and GIS groups than the other two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The percentage of participants achieving PASS almost tripled at 12 months. Improvements in PROMs across all PASS trajectories highlights the importance of distinction between \"feeling better\" and \"feeling good.\"</p>","PeriodicalId":8406,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proportion of Acceptable Symptom State Nearly Tripled With Improvements in Patient-Reported Outcomes for All Symptom State Subgroups: A Registry Study of More Than 15,000 Patients With Osteoarthritis in Digital Education and Exercise Therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Ali Kiadaliri, L Stefan Lohmander, Amanda E Nelson, Leif E Dahlberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acr.25594\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated trajectories of patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) among participants of digital education and exercise therapy for knee and hip osteoarthritis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A longitudinal observational study among individuals aged at least 40 years who participated in the digital program. Participants completed PASS (yes/no) at enrollment and at least one follow-up during 1 year after enrollment (N = 15,253). Group-based trajectory modeling was used to identify groups with distinct PASS trajectories. We used multinomial logistic regression and linear random intercept models to explore predictors and compare changes in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) across trajectory subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of participants reporting acceptable symptom state rose from 17.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 16.8%-18.1%) at enrollment to 42.4% (95% CI 41.6%-43.1%) and 48.9% (95% CI 47.5%-50.2%) at 3- and 12-month follow-ups, respectively. We identified four PASS trajectories: (1) \\\"persistently not achieving PASS\\\" (PNAP) (45.1%), (2) \\\"early sustained PASS\\\" (ESP) (34.8%), (3) \\\"gradually increasing satisfaction\\\" (GIS) (10.8%), and (4) \\\"early PASS, later unacceptable PASS\\\" (9.3%). Among baseline variables, female sex, older age, nonmetropolitan residence, lower education, knee osteoarthritis, fear of movement, no walking difficulties, no wish for surgery, and better PROMs were generally associated with higher odds of following trajectories other than the PNAP. All trajectories experienced improvements in PROMs, with generally larger improvements in the ESP and GIS groups than the other two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The percentage of participants achieving PASS almost tripled at 12 months. Improvements in PROMs across all PASS trajectories highlights the importance of distinction between \\\"feeling better\\\" and \\\"feeling good.\\\"</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthritis Care & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthritis Care & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.25594\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.25594","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Proportion of Acceptable Symptom State Nearly Tripled With Improvements in Patient-Reported Outcomes for All Symptom State Subgroups: A Registry Study of More Than 15,000 Patients With Osteoarthritis in Digital Education and Exercise Therapy.
Objective: This study investigated trajectories of patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) among participants of digital education and exercise therapy for knee and hip osteoarthritis.
Methods: A longitudinal observational study among individuals aged at least 40 years who participated in the digital program. Participants completed PASS (yes/no) at enrollment and at least one follow-up during 1 year after enrollment (N = 15,253). Group-based trajectory modeling was used to identify groups with distinct PASS trajectories. We used multinomial logistic regression and linear random intercept models to explore predictors and compare changes in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) across trajectory subgroups.
Results: The proportion of participants reporting acceptable symptom state rose from 17.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 16.8%-18.1%) at enrollment to 42.4% (95% CI 41.6%-43.1%) and 48.9% (95% CI 47.5%-50.2%) at 3- and 12-month follow-ups, respectively. We identified four PASS trajectories: (1) "persistently not achieving PASS" (PNAP) (45.1%), (2) "early sustained PASS" (ESP) (34.8%), (3) "gradually increasing satisfaction" (GIS) (10.8%), and (4) "early PASS, later unacceptable PASS" (9.3%). Among baseline variables, female sex, older age, nonmetropolitan residence, lower education, knee osteoarthritis, fear of movement, no walking difficulties, no wish for surgery, and better PROMs were generally associated with higher odds of following trajectories other than the PNAP. All trajectories experienced improvements in PROMs, with generally larger improvements in the ESP and GIS groups than the other two groups.
Conclusion: The percentage of participants achieving PASS almost tripled at 12 months. Improvements in PROMs across all PASS trajectories highlights the importance of distinction between "feeling better" and "feeling good."
期刊介绍:
Arthritis Care & Research, an official journal of the American College of Rheumatology and the Association of Rheumatology Health Professionals (a division of the College), is a peer-reviewed publication that publishes original research, review articles, and editorials that promote excellence in the clinical practice of rheumatology. Relevant to the care of individuals with rheumatic diseases, major topics are evidence-based practice studies, clinical problems, practice guidelines, educational, social, and public health issues, health economics, health care policy, and future trends in rheumatology practice.