Sofonyas Abebaw Tiruneh, Daniel Lorber Rolnik, Roshan Selvaratnam, Fabricio da Silva Costa, Andrew McLennan, Jon Hyett, Helena Teede, Joanne Enticott
{"title":"胎儿医学基金会模型在澳大利亚人群中11-14周早产子痫前期预测的外部验证。","authors":"Sofonyas Abebaw Tiruneh, Daniel Lorber Rolnik, Roshan Selvaratnam, Fabricio da Silva Costa, Andrew McLennan, Jon Hyett, Helena Teede, Joanne Enticott","doi":"10.1111/aogs.70002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pre-eclampsia causes adverse maternal and perinatal complications and is preventable through early screening and aspirin treatment. This study evaluates the predictive performance of the Fetal Medicine Foundation first-trimester preterm pre-eclampsia competing risks model in an Australian population.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected multisite screening data and pregnancy outcomes between 2014 and 2017 in Australia. Individualized risk for preterm pre-eclampsia was calculated using the Fetal Medicine Foundation model at 11-14 weeks by using maternal factors, biophysical biomarkers (mean arterial pressure (MAP), uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI)), and serum biochemical biomarkers (placental growth factor (PlGF) and/or pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A)). The predictive performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) and calibration. The detection rates for delivery with preterm pre-eclampsia were calculated at a 10% fixed false-positive rate. Decision curve analysis of the model was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 29 609 women screened, 132 (0.45%) experienced preterm pre-eclampsia. The median age (interquartile range) was 34 (30-38) years. Women with pre-eclampsia had higher multiple of the median values of MAP and UtA-PI and lower values of PIGF and PAPP-A compared to those without pre-eclampsia. Combined screening by maternal factors, biophysical, and biochemical biomarkers yielded an AUC of 0.87 (95% CI 0.79-0.92), detecting 71% of preterm pre-eclampsia cases at 10% fixed false-positive rate, with the addition of PlGF improving the detection rate by 31% over sole PAPP-A use. Preterm pre-eclampsia screening using maternal factors with all biomarkers showed better clinical net benefit at preference thresholds between 1% and 12% compared to default strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Fetal Medicine Foundation model, combining maternal factors with biophysical and biochemical biomarkers, demonstrated similar predictive performance in the Australian population compared to previous validation studies in other settings, detecting 71% of preterm pre-eclampsia cases at 10% fixed false-positive rate. The clinical utility analysis showed that early screening and intervention strategies based on a risk-based screening approach is more beneficial than universal or no intervention strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":6990,"journal":{"name":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"External validation of the Fetal Medicine Foundation model for preterm pre-eclampsia prediction at 11-14 weeks in an Australian population.\",\"authors\":\"Sofonyas Abebaw Tiruneh, Daniel Lorber Rolnik, Roshan Selvaratnam, Fabricio da Silva Costa, Andrew McLennan, Jon Hyett, Helena Teede, Joanne Enticott\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aogs.70002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pre-eclampsia causes adverse maternal and perinatal complications and is preventable through early screening and aspirin treatment. This study evaluates the predictive performance of the Fetal Medicine Foundation first-trimester preterm pre-eclampsia competing risks model in an Australian population.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected multisite screening data and pregnancy outcomes between 2014 and 2017 in Australia. Individualized risk for preterm pre-eclampsia was calculated using the Fetal Medicine Foundation model at 11-14 weeks by using maternal factors, biophysical biomarkers (mean arterial pressure (MAP), uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI)), and serum biochemical biomarkers (placental growth factor (PlGF) and/or pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A)). The predictive performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) and calibration. The detection rates for delivery with preterm pre-eclampsia were calculated at a 10% fixed false-positive rate. Decision curve analysis of the model was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 29 609 women screened, 132 (0.45%) experienced preterm pre-eclampsia. The median age (interquartile range) was 34 (30-38) years. Women with pre-eclampsia had higher multiple of the median values of MAP and UtA-PI and lower values of PIGF and PAPP-A compared to those without pre-eclampsia. Combined screening by maternal factors, biophysical, and biochemical biomarkers yielded an AUC of 0.87 (95% CI 0.79-0.92), detecting 71% of preterm pre-eclampsia cases at 10% fixed false-positive rate, with the addition of PlGF improving the detection rate by 31% over sole PAPP-A use. Preterm pre-eclampsia screening using maternal factors with all biomarkers showed better clinical net benefit at preference thresholds between 1% and 12% compared to default strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Fetal Medicine Foundation model, combining maternal factors with biophysical and biochemical biomarkers, demonstrated similar predictive performance in the Australian population compared to previous validation studies in other settings, detecting 71% of preterm pre-eclampsia cases at 10% fixed false-positive rate. The clinical utility analysis showed that early screening and intervention strategies based on a risk-based screening approach is more beneficial than universal or no intervention strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6990,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.70002\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.70002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:先兆子痫引起不良的产妇和围产期并发症,可通过早期筛查和阿司匹林治疗来预防。本研究评估了胎儿医学基金会在澳大利亚人群中早期妊娠早产先兆子痫竞争风险模型的预测性能。材料和方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,前瞻性收集了澳大利亚2014年至2017年的多地点筛查数据和妊娠结局。在11-14周时,采用胎儿医学基金会模型,通过母体因素、生物物理标志物(平均动脉压(MAP)、子宫动脉搏动指数(UtA-PI))和血清生化生物标志物(胎盘生长因子(PlGF)和/或妊娠相关血浆蛋白A (PAPP-A))计算早产子痫前期个体化风险。使用接收机工作特性曲线下面积(AUC)和校准来评估预测性能。早产先兆子痫的检出率以10%的固定假阳性率计算。对模型的决策曲线分析进行了评价。结果:在筛查的29609名妇女中,132名(0.45%)经历了早产先兆子痫。年龄中位数(四分位数间距)为34岁(30-38岁)。与没有子痫前期的妇女相比,有子痫前期的妇女MAP和UtA-PI中位数的倍数更高,PIGF和PAPP-A的值更低。通过母体因素、生物物理和生化生物标志物的联合筛查,AUC为0.87 (95% CI 0.79-0.92),以10%的固定假阳性率检测出71%的早产子痫前期病例,添加PlGF比单独使用pap - a的检出率提高31%。与默认策略相比,使用具有所有生物标志物的母体因素进行早产子痫前期筛查显示,在1%至12%的偏好阈值范围内,临床净收益更好。结论:胎儿医学基金会模型将母体因素与生物物理和生化生物标志物相结合,与之前在其他环境下的验证研究相比,在澳大利亚人群中显示出相似的预测性能,检测出71%的早产先兆子痫病例,10%的固定假阳性率。临床效用分析显示,基于风险筛查的早期筛查和干预策略比普遍或不干预策略更有益。
External validation of the Fetal Medicine Foundation model for preterm pre-eclampsia prediction at 11-14 weeks in an Australian population.
Introduction: Pre-eclampsia causes adverse maternal and perinatal complications and is preventable through early screening and aspirin treatment. This study evaluates the predictive performance of the Fetal Medicine Foundation first-trimester preterm pre-eclampsia competing risks model in an Australian population.
Material and methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected multisite screening data and pregnancy outcomes between 2014 and 2017 in Australia. Individualized risk for preterm pre-eclampsia was calculated using the Fetal Medicine Foundation model at 11-14 weeks by using maternal factors, biophysical biomarkers (mean arterial pressure (MAP), uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI)), and serum biochemical biomarkers (placental growth factor (PlGF) and/or pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A)). The predictive performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) and calibration. The detection rates for delivery with preterm pre-eclampsia were calculated at a 10% fixed false-positive rate. Decision curve analysis of the model was evaluated.
Results: Of 29 609 women screened, 132 (0.45%) experienced preterm pre-eclampsia. The median age (interquartile range) was 34 (30-38) years. Women with pre-eclampsia had higher multiple of the median values of MAP and UtA-PI and lower values of PIGF and PAPP-A compared to those without pre-eclampsia. Combined screening by maternal factors, biophysical, and biochemical biomarkers yielded an AUC of 0.87 (95% CI 0.79-0.92), detecting 71% of preterm pre-eclampsia cases at 10% fixed false-positive rate, with the addition of PlGF improving the detection rate by 31% over sole PAPP-A use. Preterm pre-eclampsia screening using maternal factors with all biomarkers showed better clinical net benefit at preference thresholds between 1% and 12% compared to default strategies.
Conclusions: The Fetal Medicine Foundation model, combining maternal factors with biophysical and biochemical biomarkers, demonstrated similar predictive performance in the Australian population compared to previous validation studies in other settings, detecting 71% of preterm pre-eclampsia cases at 10% fixed false-positive rate. The clinical utility analysis showed that early screening and intervention strategies based on a risk-based screening approach is more beneficial than universal or no intervention strategies.
期刊介绍:
Published monthly, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica is an international journal dedicated to providing the very latest information on the results of both clinical, basic and translational research work related to all aspects of women’s health from around the globe. The journal regularly publishes commentaries, reviews, and original articles on a wide variety of topics including: gynecology, pregnancy, birth, female urology, gynecologic oncology, fertility and reproductive biology.