Eline S Wijstma, Vita W Jongen, Anders Boyd, Henry J C De Vries, Maarten F Schim Van Der Loeff, Maria Prins, Elske Hoornenborg
{"title":"经常有保健障碍的亚人群性传播感染的风险增加,并从艾滋病毒暴露前预防保健中退出。","authors":"Eline S Wijstma, Vita W Jongen, Anders Boyd, Henry J C De Vries, Maarten F Schim Van Der Loeff, Maria Prins, Elske Hoornenborg","doi":"10.1097/QAD.0000000000004224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Certain subpopulations (i.e., <25 years, transgender, sex worker, uninsured or migrant) were prioritized for inclusion in the Dutch preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) pilot. We compared incidence of sexually transmitted infections (STI) during and drop-out from HIV PrEP care between prioritized and nonprioritized subpopulations.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective longitudinal study using routinely collected data at the Centre for Sexual Health Amsterdam, 2019-2024.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We modelled incidence rates (IR) for any STI while on PrEP using Poisson regression, adjusting for testing frequency and calendar time. We modelled the probability of early loss-to-follow-up (LTFU) (i.e., no PrEP follow-up visit within 12 months of enrolment) using logistic regression, adjusting for sexual behaviour. We modelled the probability of later LTFU (i.e., no PrEP visit within 12 months of a prior PrEP follow-up visit) using competing risk regression, adjusting for sexual behaviour. We added subpopulations as indicator variables to all models to compare endpoints between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 4781 individuals included (median age 32 years, IQR = 26-40), 50.2% ( n = 2402) belonged to prioritized subpopulations. The IR of any STI was 101.6/100 person-years. STI IR were higher among those belonging to prioritized groups (except for the transgender group). 494 individuals had early LTFU, which was associated with age <25 years, reporting sex work, and being a migrant. Later LTFU occurred 933 times and was associated with age <25 years, being transgender, and reporting sex work.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>People belonging to prioritized subpopulations had more STIs and were more often LTFU from PrEP care. Targeted interventions to support PrEP retention and prevent STIs are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":7502,"journal":{"name":"AIDS","volume":" ","pages":"1610-1620"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12337923/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subpopulations with frequent healthcare barriers have increased risk of sexually transmitted infections and dropping out from HIV preexposure prophylaxis care.\",\"authors\":\"Eline S Wijstma, Vita W Jongen, Anders Boyd, Henry J C De Vries, Maarten F Schim Van Der Loeff, Maria Prins, Elske Hoornenborg\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/QAD.0000000000004224\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Certain subpopulations (i.e., <25 years, transgender, sex worker, uninsured or migrant) were prioritized for inclusion in the Dutch preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) pilot. We compared incidence of sexually transmitted infections (STI) during and drop-out from HIV PrEP care between prioritized and nonprioritized subpopulations.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective longitudinal study using routinely collected data at the Centre for Sexual Health Amsterdam, 2019-2024.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We modelled incidence rates (IR) for any STI while on PrEP using Poisson regression, adjusting for testing frequency and calendar time. We modelled the probability of early loss-to-follow-up (LTFU) (i.e., no PrEP follow-up visit within 12 months of enrolment) using logistic regression, adjusting for sexual behaviour. We modelled the probability of later LTFU (i.e., no PrEP visit within 12 months of a prior PrEP follow-up visit) using competing risk regression, adjusting for sexual behaviour. We added subpopulations as indicator variables to all models to compare endpoints between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 4781 individuals included (median age 32 years, IQR = 26-40), 50.2% ( n = 2402) belonged to prioritized subpopulations. The IR of any STI was 101.6/100 person-years. STI IR were higher among those belonging to prioritized groups (except for the transgender group). 494 individuals had early LTFU, which was associated with age <25 years, reporting sex work, and being a migrant. Later LTFU occurred 933 times and was associated with age <25 years, being transgender, and reporting sex work.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>People belonging to prioritized subpopulations had more STIs and were more often LTFU from PrEP care. Targeted interventions to support PrEP retention and prevent STIs are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AIDS\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1610-1620\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12337923/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AIDS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000004224\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIDS","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000004224","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Subpopulations with frequent healthcare barriers have increased risk of sexually transmitted infections and dropping out from HIV preexposure prophylaxis care.
Objective: Certain subpopulations (i.e., <25 years, transgender, sex worker, uninsured or migrant) were prioritized for inclusion in the Dutch preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) pilot. We compared incidence of sexually transmitted infections (STI) during and drop-out from HIV PrEP care between prioritized and nonprioritized subpopulations.
Design: Retrospective longitudinal study using routinely collected data at the Centre for Sexual Health Amsterdam, 2019-2024.
Methods: We modelled incidence rates (IR) for any STI while on PrEP using Poisson regression, adjusting for testing frequency and calendar time. We modelled the probability of early loss-to-follow-up (LTFU) (i.e., no PrEP follow-up visit within 12 months of enrolment) using logistic regression, adjusting for sexual behaviour. We modelled the probability of later LTFU (i.e., no PrEP visit within 12 months of a prior PrEP follow-up visit) using competing risk regression, adjusting for sexual behaviour. We added subpopulations as indicator variables to all models to compare endpoints between groups.
Results: Of 4781 individuals included (median age 32 years, IQR = 26-40), 50.2% ( n = 2402) belonged to prioritized subpopulations. The IR of any STI was 101.6/100 person-years. STI IR were higher among those belonging to prioritized groups (except for the transgender group). 494 individuals had early LTFU, which was associated with age <25 years, reporting sex work, and being a migrant. Later LTFU occurred 933 times and was associated with age <25 years, being transgender, and reporting sex work.
Conclusion: People belonging to prioritized subpopulations had more STIs and were more often LTFU from PrEP care. Targeted interventions to support PrEP retention and prevent STIs are needed.
期刊介绍:
Publishing the very latest ground breaking research on HIV and AIDS. Read by all the top clinicians and researchers, AIDS has the highest impact of all AIDS-related journals. With 18 issues per year, AIDS guarantees the authoritative presentation of significant advances. The Editors, themselves noted international experts who know the demands of your work, are committed to making AIDS the most distinguished and innovative journal in the field. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.