弗兰德斯的第一批狼群:公众在社交媒体对话中的意义制造和基于地点的知识。

IF 3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Ann Van Herzele, Liesa Lammens, Noelle Aarts
{"title":"弗兰德斯的第一批狼群:公众在社交媒体对话中的意义制造和基于地点的知识。","authors":"Ann Van Herzele, Liesa Lammens, Noelle Aarts","doi":"10.1007/s00267-025-02216-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This interpretive qualitative study addresses publics' sensemaking in relation to ecological changes that they had not known or experienced before. The context is the current recolonization by gray wolves in Europe, which led to the first wolf pack in the Flanders Region (Belgium) in two centuries. Ethnographic observation of the conversations that took place on government social media, after surprising events-from the arrival of a she-wolf to the raising of her young-reveals a recurring pattern of four sensemaking activities: (1) creating welcoming, protective sentiments, (2) assessing future survival chances for wolves, (3) anticipating disruptions by wolves, and (4) explaining raisons d'être of wolves. By elaborating on and discussing these activities, we highlight the self-triggering dynamics of the unfolding sensemaking process, and the diversity of knowledge sources and approaches involved. In this ongoing process, social media participants increasingly relied on abstract knowledge, analogies and past-time representations that, however, do not resolve the uncertainties and ambiguities encountered. Yet, despite the unprecedented circumstances, our findings suggest potential for place-based knowledge to support the publics' sensemaking in ways that open up relevant experiential perspectives -including those of the wolves-to deal with the daily challenges of human-wolf coexistence on the ground.</p>","PeriodicalId":543,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flanders' First Wolf Pack: Publics' Sensemaking and Place-Based Knowledge in Social Media Conversations.\",\"authors\":\"Ann Van Herzele, Liesa Lammens, Noelle Aarts\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00267-025-02216-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This interpretive qualitative study addresses publics' sensemaking in relation to ecological changes that they had not known or experienced before. The context is the current recolonization by gray wolves in Europe, which led to the first wolf pack in the Flanders Region (Belgium) in two centuries. Ethnographic observation of the conversations that took place on government social media, after surprising events-from the arrival of a she-wolf to the raising of her young-reveals a recurring pattern of four sensemaking activities: (1) creating welcoming, protective sentiments, (2) assessing future survival chances for wolves, (3) anticipating disruptions by wolves, and (4) explaining raisons d'être of wolves. By elaborating on and discussing these activities, we highlight the self-triggering dynamics of the unfolding sensemaking process, and the diversity of knowledge sources and approaches involved. In this ongoing process, social media participants increasingly relied on abstract knowledge, analogies and past-time representations that, however, do not resolve the uncertainties and ambiguities encountered. Yet, despite the unprecedented circumstances, our findings suggest potential for place-based knowledge to support the publics' sensemaking in ways that open up relevant experiential perspectives -including those of the wolves-to deal with the daily challenges of human-wolf coexistence on the ground.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-025-02216-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-025-02216-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这个解释性质的研究解决了公众对他们以前不知道或经历过的生态变化的理解。背景是目前灰狼在欧洲的重新殖民,这导致了两个世纪以来佛兰德斯地区(比利时)的第一个狼群。对发生在政府社交媒体上的对话进行人种学观察,在意外事件之后——从母狼的到来到幼狼的抚养——揭示了四种意义建构活动的重复模式:(1)创造欢迎和保护的情绪,(2)评估狼的未来生存机会,(3)预测狼的破坏,(4)解释狼存在的原因。通过对这些活动的详细阐述和讨论,我们强调了展开的语义构建过程的自触发动态,以及所涉及的知识来源和方法的多样性。在这个持续的过程中,社交媒体参与者越来越依赖于抽象知识、类比和过去的表征,然而,这些并不能解决所遇到的不确定性和模糊性。然而,尽管情况前所未有,我们的研究结果表明,基于地点的知识有可能支持公众的理解,以开辟相关的经验视角——包括狼的视角——来应对人类与狼在地面上共存的日常挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Flanders' First Wolf Pack: Publics' Sensemaking and Place-Based Knowledge in Social Media Conversations.

This interpretive qualitative study addresses publics' sensemaking in relation to ecological changes that they had not known or experienced before. The context is the current recolonization by gray wolves in Europe, which led to the first wolf pack in the Flanders Region (Belgium) in two centuries. Ethnographic observation of the conversations that took place on government social media, after surprising events-from the arrival of a she-wolf to the raising of her young-reveals a recurring pattern of four sensemaking activities: (1) creating welcoming, protective sentiments, (2) assessing future survival chances for wolves, (3) anticipating disruptions by wolves, and (4) explaining raisons d'être of wolves. By elaborating on and discussing these activities, we highlight the self-triggering dynamics of the unfolding sensemaking process, and the diversity of knowledge sources and approaches involved. In this ongoing process, social media participants increasingly relied on abstract knowledge, analogies and past-time representations that, however, do not resolve the uncertainties and ambiguities encountered. Yet, despite the unprecedented circumstances, our findings suggest potential for place-based knowledge to support the publics' sensemaking in ways that open up relevant experiential perspectives -including those of the wolves-to deal with the daily challenges of human-wolf coexistence on the ground.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Management
Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
178
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Management offers research and opinions on use and conservation of natural resources, protection of habitats and control of hazards, spanning the field of environmental management without regard to traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal aims to improve communication, making ideas and results from any field available to practitioners from other backgrounds. Contributions are drawn from biology, botany, chemistry, climatology, ecology, ecological economics, environmental engineering, fisheries, environmental law, forest sciences, geosciences, information science, public affairs, public health, toxicology, zoology and more. As the principal user of nature, humanity is responsible for ensuring that its environmental impacts are benign rather than catastrophic. Environmental Management presents the work of academic researchers and professionals outside universities, including those in business, government, research establishments, and public interest groups, presenting a wide spectrum of viewpoints and approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信