妊娠期高血压疾病妇女的产前皮质类固醇治疗:日本一项基于人群的研究

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Takafumi Ushida, Kazuya Fuma, Satoru Katsuki, Sho Tano, Seiko Matsuo, Kenji Imai, Hiroaki Kajiyama, Tomomi Kotani
{"title":"妊娠期高血压疾病妇女的产前皮质类固醇治疗:日本一项基于人群的研究","authors":"Takafumi Ushida,&nbsp;Kazuya Fuma,&nbsp;Satoru Katsuki,&nbsp;Sho Tano,&nbsp;Seiko Matsuo,&nbsp;Kenji Imai,&nbsp;Hiroaki Kajiyama,&nbsp;Tomomi Kotani","doi":"10.1111/jog.16364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to evaluate the current antenatal corticosteroid (ACS) treatment practices for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) in Japan, by evaluating annual trends and identifying clinical disparities and factors influencing non-administration of ACS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective population-based study was conducted using the Japanese Perinatal Research Network Database from 2013 to 2022. We analyzed ACS administration rates over time, across facility types, and the timing of delivery. Factors influencing non-administration were identified using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>ACS administration rates among patients with HDP nearly doubled over the past decade, reaching 64.0% in 2022. Approximately 70% of patients with HDP who received ACS delivered before 34 weeks of gestation; however, only 30% achieved the optimal administration-to-birth interval of 48 h to 7 days. ACS administration rates in patients with HDP differed by facility type: 67.8% (1641/2419) in general perinatal medical centers, 60.5% (1107/1830) in regional perinatal medical centers, and 39.7% (23/58) in non-perinatal medical centers. Factors contributing to non-administration included smoking during pregnancy, eclampsia, placental abruption, HELLP syndrome, regional perinatal medical centers, non-perinatal medical centers, and gestational hypertension. Conversely, conditions such as fetal growth restriction, threatened preterm labor, and preterm premature rupture of membranes were associated with higher rates of ACS administration.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Although ACS administration rates in patients with HDP have improved over time, challenges remain in achieving optimal administration timing and addressing facility-based disparities. To improve administration rates, clinicians should increase awareness of ACS treatment and proactively manage HDP-related emergencies.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16593,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research","volume":"51 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jog.16364","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antenatal corticosteroid treatment for women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: A population-based study in Japan\",\"authors\":\"Takafumi Ushida,&nbsp;Kazuya Fuma,&nbsp;Satoru Katsuki,&nbsp;Sho Tano,&nbsp;Seiko Matsuo,&nbsp;Kenji Imai,&nbsp;Hiroaki Kajiyama,&nbsp;Tomomi Kotani\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jog.16364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aimed to evaluate the current antenatal corticosteroid (ACS) treatment practices for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) in Japan, by evaluating annual trends and identifying clinical disparities and factors influencing non-administration of ACS.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This retrospective population-based study was conducted using the Japanese Perinatal Research Network Database from 2013 to 2022. We analyzed ACS administration rates over time, across facility types, and the timing of delivery. Factors influencing non-administration were identified using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>ACS administration rates among patients with HDP nearly doubled over the past decade, reaching 64.0% in 2022. Approximately 70% of patients with HDP who received ACS delivered before 34 weeks of gestation; however, only 30% achieved the optimal administration-to-birth interval of 48 h to 7 days. ACS administration rates in patients with HDP differed by facility type: 67.8% (1641/2419) in general perinatal medical centers, 60.5% (1107/1830) in regional perinatal medical centers, and 39.7% (23/58) in non-perinatal medical centers. Factors contributing to non-administration included smoking during pregnancy, eclampsia, placental abruption, HELLP syndrome, regional perinatal medical centers, non-perinatal medical centers, and gestational hypertension. Conversely, conditions such as fetal growth restriction, threatened preterm labor, and preterm premature rupture of membranes were associated with higher rates of ACS administration.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Although ACS administration rates in patients with HDP have improved over time, challenges remain in achieving optimal administration timing and addressing facility-based disparities. To improve administration rates, clinicians should increase awareness of ACS treatment and proactively manage HDP-related emergencies.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research\",\"volume\":\"51 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jog.16364\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jog.16364\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jog.16364","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在评估日本产前皮质类固醇(ACS)治疗妊娠高血压疾病(HDP)的现状,通过评估年度趋势,确定临床差异和影响未给药ACS的因素。方法采用2013 - 2022年日本围产期研究网络数据库进行回顾性人群研究。我们分析了ACS随时间的管理率,跨设施类型和交付时间。采用单因素和多因素logistic回归分析确定影响不给药的因素。结果HDP患者的ACS给药率在过去十年中几乎翻了一番,到2022年达到64.0%。约70%接受ACS治疗的HDP患者在妊娠34周前分娩;然而,只有30%的人达到了48小时至7天的最佳给药间隔。HDP患者的ACS给药率因机构类型而异:一般围产期医疗中心67.8%(1641/2419),地区围产期医疗中心60.5%(1107/1830),非围产期医疗中心39.7%(23/58)。导致不给药的因素包括怀孕期间吸烟、子痫、胎盘早剥、HELLP综合征、地区围产期医疗中心、非围产期医疗中心和妊娠期高血压。相反,胎儿生长受限、先兆早产和胎膜早破等情况与ACS给药率较高相关。结论:尽管HDP患者的ACS给药率随着时间的推移有所改善,但在实现最佳给药时间和解决基于设施的差异方面仍然存在挑战。为了提高给药率,临床医生应提高对ACS治疗的认识,并积极管理与hdp相关的紧急情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Antenatal corticosteroid treatment for women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: A population-based study in Japan

Antenatal corticosteroid treatment for women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: A population-based study in Japan

Aim

This study aimed to evaluate the current antenatal corticosteroid (ACS) treatment practices for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) in Japan, by evaluating annual trends and identifying clinical disparities and factors influencing non-administration of ACS.

Methods

This retrospective population-based study was conducted using the Japanese Perinatal Research Network Database from 2013 to 2022. We analyzed ACS administration rates over time, across facility types, and the timing of delivery. Factors influencing non-administration were identified using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.

Results

ACS administration rates among patients with HDP nearly doubled over the past decade, reaching 64.0% in 2022. Approximately 70% of patients with HDP who received ACS delivered before 34 weeks of gestation; however, only 30% achieved the optimal administration-to-birth interval of 48 h to 7 days. ACS administration rates in patients with HDP differed by facility type: 67.8% (1641/2419) in general perinatal medical centers, 60.5% (1107/1830) in regional perinatal medical centers, and 39.7% (23/58) in non-perinatal medical centers. Factors contributing to non-administration included smoking during pregnancy, eclampsia, placental abruption, HELLP syndrome, regional perinatal medical centers, non-perinatal medical centers, and gestational hypertension. Conversely, conditions such as fetal growth restriction, threatened preterm labor, and preterm premature rupture of membranes were associated with higher rates of ACS administration.

Conclusions

Although ACS administration rates in patients with HDP have improved over time, challenges remain in achieving optimal administration timing and addressing facility-based disparities. To improve administration rates, clinicians should increase awareness of ACS treatment and proactively manage HDP-related emergencies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
376
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research is the official Journal of the Asia and Oceania Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology and of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and aims to provide a medium for the publication of articles in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology. The Journal publishes original research articles, case reports, review articles and letters to the editor. The Journal will give publication priority to original research articles over case reports. Accepted papers become the exclusive licence of the Journal. Manuscripts are peer reviewed by at least two referees and/or Associate Editors expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信