{"title":"化学工程教育中的因果关系:机器学习在故障诊断中的应用","authors":"Manasvinni Laul, Daniela Galatro","doi":"10.1016/j.ece.2025.06.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study integrates the design and preassessment of an exercise, incorporating a causation modeling approach into the Tennessee Eastman Process (TEP) dataset to enhance engineering students' understanding of process monitoring and fault diagnosis. The dataset, which contains 41 measured and 11 manipulated variables under normal and faulty conditions, was used to illustrate the application of the machine learning algorithm causal random forests (CRF) and treatment effect estimation in chemical process analysis. This approach differs from traditional ways of teaching/learning complex chemical engineering phenomena through governing equations, heuristics, and lab experiments. Three learning outcomes were developed for this exercise: understanding the impact of dataset composition on model interpretation, understanding how the model performance metrics differ when applied to regression and classification tasks, and understanding causality using different treatment variables. These learning outcomes were proposed to provide students with strong foundations in data integrity, model evaluation, and causal inference. In the context of engineering education, our preassessment of the effectiveness of applying this exercise to a course cohort was conducted by a summer student and closely supervised by the instructor. While the 3-hour session proved valuable and somehow feasible, some logistic challenges were gathered from this preassessment, mainly regarding time constraints and the complexity of the dataset, suggesting that breaking the exercise into smaller sessions and offering additional resources would enhance student understanding, as well as providing students with clearer explanations of technical concepts, and interactive feedback to increase engagement in future implementations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48509,"journal":{"name":"Education for Chemical Engineers","volume":"53 ","pages":"Pages 17-24"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Causation in chemical engineering education: Application of machine learning in fault diagnosis\",\"authors\":\"Manasvinni Laul, Daniela Galatro\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ece.2025.06.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study integrates the design and preassessment of an exercise, incorporating a causation modeling approach into the Tennessee Eastman Process (TEP) dataset to enhance engineering students' understanding of process monitoring and fault diagnosis. The dataset, which contains 41 measured and 11 manipulated variables under normal and faulty conditions, was used to illustrate the application of the machine learning algorithm causal random forests (CRF) and treatment effect estimation in chemical process analysis. This approach differs from traditional ways of teaching/learning complex chemical engineering phenomena through governing equations, heuristics, and lab experiments. Three learning outcomes were developed for this exercise: understanding the impact of dataset composition on model interpretation, understanding how the model performance metrics differ when applied to regression and classification tasks, and understanding causality using different treatment variables. These learning outcomes were proposed to provide students with strong foundations in data integrity, model evaluation, and causal inference. In the context of engineering education, our preassessment of the effectiveness of applying this exercise to a course cohort was conducted by a summer student and closely supervised by the instructor. While the 3-hour session proved valuable and somehow feasible, some logistic challenges were gathered from this preassessment, mainly regarding time constraints and the complexity of the dataset, suggesting that breaking the exercise into smaller sessions and offering additional resources would enhance student understanding, as well as providing students with clearer explanations of technical concepts, and interactive feedback to increase engagement in future implementations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48509,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education for Chemical Engineers\",\"volume\":\"53 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 17-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education for Chemical Engineers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1749772825000326\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education for Chemical Engineers","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1749772825000326","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Causation in chemical engineering education: Application of machine learning in fault diagnosis
This study integrates the design and preassessment of an exercise, incorporating a causation modeling approach into the Tennessee Eastman Process (TEP) dataset to enhance engineering students' understanding of process monitoring and fault diagnosis. The dataset, which contains 41 measured and 11 manipulated variables under normal and faulty conditions, was used to illustrate the application of the machine learning algorithm causal random forests (CRF) and treatment effect estimation in chemical process analysis. This approach differs from traditional ways of teaching/learning complex chemical engineering phenomena through governing equations, heuristics, and lab experiments. Three learning outcomes were developed for this exercise: understanding the impact of dataset composition on model interpretation, understanding how the model performance metrics differ when applied to regression and classification tasks, and understanding causality using different treatment variables. These learning outcomes were proposed to provide students with strong foundations in data integrity, model evaluation, and causal inference. In the context of engineering education, our preassessment of the effectiveness of applying this exercise to a course cohort was conducted by a summer student and closely supervised by the instructor. While the 3-hour session proved valuable and somehow feasible, some logistic challenges were gathered from this preassessment, mainly regarding time constraints and the complexity of the dataset, suggesting that breaking the exercise into smaller sessions and offering additional resources would enhance student understanding, as well as providing students with clearer explanations of technical concepts, and interactive feedback to increase engagement in future implementations.
期刊介绍:
Education for Chemical Engineers was launched in 2006 with a remit to publisheducation research papers, resource reviews and teaching and learning notes. ECE is targeted at chemical engineering academics and educators, discussing the ongoingchanges and development in chemical engineering education. This international title publishes papers from around the world, creating a global network of chemical engineering academics. Papers demonstrating how educational research results can be applied to chemical engineering education are particularly welcome, as are the accounts of research work that brings new perspectives to established principles, highlighting unsolved problems or indicating direction for future research relevant to chemical engineering education. Core topic areas: -Assessment- Accreditation- Curriculum development and transformation- Design- Diversity- Distance education-- E-learning Entrepreneurship programs- Industry-academic linkages- Benchmarking- Lifelong learning- Multidisciplinary programs- Outreach from kindergarten to high school programs- Student recruitment and retention and transition programs- New technology- Problem-based learning- Social responsibility and professionalism- Teamwork- Web-based learning