尼泊尔以竹子为基础的碳信用计划的潜在障碍是什么?

IF 3.7
Santosh Ayer
{"title":"尼泊尔以竹子为基础的碳信用计划的潜在障碍是什么?","authors":"Santosh Ayer","doi":"10.1016/j.bamboo.2025.100179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Bamboo, often referred to as “green gold”, has emerged as a promising nature-based solution for climate change mitigation due to its rapid growth rate and carbon sequestration capacity. With over 53 species across 12 genera distributed from the Terai lowlands to the Himalayan foothills, Nepal holds substantial potential to engage in bamboo-based carbon credit mechanisms. To support this potential, I conducted a narrative review focused on Nepal-specific literature, complemented by global sources to contextualize broader methodological and policy gaps that constrain bamboo’s integration into carbon markets. Globally, bamboo remains underrepresented in carbon certification frameworks due to the absence of recognized methodologies, standardized measurement, reporting, and verification (MRV) protocols, and its classification as a non-timber forest product. These global limitations pose additional barriers for countries like Nepal, where bamboo is largely cultivated outside traditional forest areas. In addition, key challenges for Nepal include: (1) inadequate bamboo species documentation and distribution mapping, (2) lack of structured silvicultural management practices, (3) absence of species-specific allometric models for biomass estimation, and (4) policy and institutional gaps that exclude bamboo ecosystems—particularly those outside forests—from REDD+ and national carbon frameworks. Financial and market-related constraints, such as high project registration costs, volatile carbon pricing, and limited access to certification mechanisms, further hinder participation. While existing studies highlight bamboo’s carbon sink potential, more accurate species-level data, spatial inventories, and carbon accounting tools are required to support reliable stock estimation. Based on my findings, I recommend that Nepal should revise its national forest definition to include bamboo, develop bamboo-specific MRV protocols, clarify carbon rights, and introduce targeted financial incentives to facilitate bamboo’s inclusion in both compliance and voluntary carbon markets.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100040,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Bamboo Science","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100179"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Potential barriers to bamboo-based carbon credit initiatives in Nepal: What stands in the way?\",\"authors\":\"Santosh Ayer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bamboo.2025.100179\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Bamboo, often referred to as “green gold”, has emerged as a promising nature-based solution for climate change mitigation due to its rapid growth rate and carbon sequestration capacity. With over 53 species across 12 genera distributed from the Terai lowlands to the Himalayan foothills, Nepal holds substantial potential to engage in bamboo-based carbon credit mechanisms. To support this potential, I conducted a narrative review focused on Nepal-specific literature, complemented by global sources to contextualize broader methodological and policy gaps that constrain bamboo’s integration into carbon markets. Globally, bamboo remains underrepresented in carbon certification frameworks due to the absence of recognized methodologies, standardized measurement, reporting, and verification (MRV) protocols, and its classification as a non-timber forest product. These global limitations pose additional barriers for countries like Nepal, where bamboo is largely cultivated outside traditional forest areas. In addition, key challenges for Nepal include: (1) inadequate bamboo species documentation and distribution mapping, (2) lack of structured silvicultural management practices, (3) absence of species-specific allometric models for biomass estimation, and (4) policy and institutional gaps that exclude bamboo ecosystems—particularly those outside forests—from REDD+ and national carbon frameworks. Financial and market-related constraints, such as high project registration costs, volatile carbon pricing, and limited access to certification mechanisms, further hinder participation. While existing studies highlight bamboo’s carbon sink potential, more accurate species-level data, spatial inventories, and carbon accounting tools are required to support reliable stock estimation. Based on my findings, I recommend that Nepal should revise its national forest definition to include bamboo, develop bamboo-specific MRV protocols, clarify carbon rights, and introduce targeted financial incentives to facilitate bamboo’s inclusion in both compliance and voluntary carbon markets.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100040,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Bamboo Science\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100179\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Bamboo Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773139125000588\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Bamboo Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773139125000588","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

竹子通常被称为“绿色黄金”,由于其快速的生长速度和碳固存能力,它已成为一种有希望的基于自然的缓解气候变化的解决方案。尼泊尔拥有12属53种以上的物种,分布在特莱低地到喜马拉雅山麓,具有参与以竹子为基础的碳信用机制的巨大潜力。为了支持这一潜力,我进行了一项以尼泊尔特定文献为重点的叙述性回顾,并辅以全球资源,将限制竹子融入碳市场的更广泛的方法和政策差距置于背景下。在全球范围内,由于缺乏公认的方法、标准化测量、报告和验证(MRV)协议,以及竹子被归类为非木材林产品,竹子在碳认证框架中的代表性仍然不足。这些全球性的限制给尼泊尔这样的国家带来了额外的障碍,在这些国家,竹子主要种植在传统森林地区之外。此外,尼泊尔面临的主要挑战包括:(1)竹子物种记录和分布图不足,(2)缺乏结构化的造林管理实践,(3)缺乏用于生物量估算的物种特异性异速生长模型,以及(4)政策和制度上的差距,将竹生态系统(特别是森林外的生态系统)排除在REDD+ 和国家碳框架之外。高昂的项目注册成本、不稳定的碳定价以及有限的认证机制等与资金和市场相关的制约因素进一步阻碍了参与。虽然现有研究强调了竹子的碳汇潜力,但需要更准确的物种水平数据、空间清单和碳核算工具来支持可靠的储量估算。根据我的研究结果,我建议尼泊尔修改其国家森林定义,将竹子纳入其中,制定针对竹子的MRV协议,明确碳权,并引入有针对性的财政激励措施,以促进将竹子纳入合规和自愿碳市场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Potential barriers to bamboo-based carbon credit initiatives in Nepal: What stands in the way?
Bamboo, often referred to as “green gold”, has emerged as a promising nature-based solution for climate change mitigation due to its rapid growth rate and carbon sequestration capacity. With over 53 species across 12 genera distributed from the Terai lowlands to the Himalayan foothills, Nepal holds substantial potential to engage in bamboo-based carbon credit mechanisms. To support this potential, I conducted a narrative review focused on Nepal-specific literature, complemented by global sources to contextualize broader methodological and policy gaps that constrain bamboo’s integration into carbon markets. Globally, bamboo remains underrepresented in carbon certification frameworks due to the absence of recognized methodologies, standardized measurement, reporting, and verification (MRV) protocols, and its classification as a non-timber forest product. These global limitations pose additional barriers for countries like Nepal, where bamboo is largely cultivated outside traditional forest areas. In addition, key challenges for Nepal include: (1) inadequate bamboo species documentation and distribution mapping, (2) lack of structured silvicultural management practices, (3) absence of species-specific allometric models for biomass estimation, and (4) policy and institutional gaps that exclude bamboo ecosystems—particularly those outside forests—from REDD+ and national carbon frameworks. Financial and market-related constraints, such as high project registration costs, volatile carbon pricing, and limited access to certification mechanisms, further hinder participation. While existing studies highlight bamboo’s carbon sink potential, more accurate species-level data, spatial inventories, and carbon accounting tools are required to support reliable stock estimation. Based on my findings, I recommend that Nepal should revise its national forest definition to include bamboo, develop bamboo-specific MRV protocols, clarify carbon rights, and introduce targeted financial incentives to facilitate bamboo’s inclusion in both compliance and voluntary carbon markets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信