A.C. Belcher , M.H.W. Workman , A. Jefferson , A. Ostrovnaya
{"title":"航空部门脱碳作为一个深度不确定性的案例:需要一个综合的、探索性的和跨学科的方法","authors":"A.C. Belcher , M.H.W. Workman , A. Jefferson , A. Ostrovnaya","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Global demand for aviation is expected to double by 2050. This is set against the need to cut aviation CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from 1 GtCO<sub>2</sub> pa today to net zero over the same period. Using the UK aviation market as a proxy for the global market, we apply a Robust Decision Making (RDM) to develop integrative insights within a single analytical paradigm than discrete orthodox decision support analysis.</div><div>This approach is justified based on a critical examination of the sector characteristics and the divergent short-term motivations of aviation actors as a case of deep uncertainty. RDM explicitly embraces deep uncertainty across a number of metrics which allows multiple values and diversity among stakeholders and viewpoints, and in which modelling can exist in an iterative exchange with policy development rather than separate from it. This approach has particularly highlighted the critical significance of asset stranding, the oligopolistic structure in aerospace manufacturers and fuel suppliers, alongside the monopsonies in airlines, as current barriers to progress within a single integrative analytical paradigm.</div><div>This contribution highlights the need for the application of exploratory and interdisciplinary approaches to aviation decarbonisation transitions analysis to better inform aviation sector net zero strategies. It can improve the interdisciplinarity of analysis across technology, policy, and finance, and explore the extent of uncertainty so that robust strategies can be designed as well as generate insight into systematic upstream requirements.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 104158"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aviation sector decarbonisation as a case of deep uncertainty: The need for an integrative, exploratory, and interdisciplinary approach\",\"authors\":\"A.C. Belcher , M.H.W. Workman , A. Jefferson , A. Ostrovnaya\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Global demand for aviation is expected to double by 2050. This is set against the need to cut aviation CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from 1 GtCO<sub>2</sub> pa today to net zero over the same period. Using the UK aviation market as a proxy for the global market, we apply a Robust Decision Making (RDM) to develop integrative insights within a single analytical paradigm than discrete orthodox decision support analysis.</div><div>This approach is justified based on a critical examination of the sector characteristics and the divergent short-term motivations of aviation actors as a case of deep uncertainty. RDM explicitly embraces deep uncertainty across a number of metrics which allows multiple values and diversity among stakeholders and viewpoints, and in which modelling can exist in an iterative exchange with policy development rather than separate from it. This approach has particularly highlighted the critical significance of asset stranding, the oligopolistic structure in aerospace manufacturers and fuel suppliers, alongside the monopsonies in airlines, as current barriers to progress within a single integrative analytical paradigm.</div><div>This contribution highlights the need for the application of exploratory and interdisciplinary approaches to aviation decarbonisation transitions analysis to better inform aviation sector net zero strategies. It can improve the interdisciplinarity of analysis across technology, policy, and finance, and explore the extent of uncertainty so that robust strategies can be designed as well as generate insight into systematic upstream requirements.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":\"127 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104158\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625002397\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625002397","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Aviation sector decarbonisation as a case of deep uncertainty: The need for an integrative, exploratory, and interdisciplinary approach
Global demand for aviation is expected to double by 2050. This is set against the need to cut aviation CO2 emissions from 1 GtCO2 pa today to net zero over the same period. Using the UK aviation market as a proxy for the global market, we apply a Robust Decision Making (RDM) to develop integrative insights within a single analytical paradigm than discrete orthodox decision support analysis.
This approach is justified based on a critical examination of the sector characteristics and the divergent short-term motivations of aviation actors as a case of deep uncertainty. RDM explicitly embraces deep uncertainty across a number of metrics which allows multiple values and diversity among stakeholders and viewpoints, and in which modelling can exist in an iterative exchange with policy development rather than separate from it. This approach has particularly highlighted the critical significance of asset stranding, the oligopolistic structure in aerospace manufacturers and fuel suppliers, alongside the monopsonies in airlines, as current barriers to progress within a single integrative analytical paradigm.
This contribution highlights the need for the application of exploratory and interdisciplinary approaches to aviation decarbonisation transitions analysis to better inform aviation sector net zero strategies. It can improve the interdisciplinarity of analysis across technology, policy, and finance, and explore the extent of uncertainty so that robust strategies can be designed as well as generate insight into systematic upstream requirements.
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.