{"title":"蛛网膜下腔出血增强脑脊液清除:脑室和腰椎联合引流的系统回顾","authors":"Matteo Palermo , Sonia D’Arrigo , Alessio Albanese , Carmelo Lucio Sturiale","doi":"10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is a severe type of stroke associated with high rates of mortality and morbidity. Two major complications following aSAH are acute hydrocephalus and delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) caused by severe vasospasm. While external ventricular drainage and lumbar drainage (LD) are typically used separately to manage hydrocephalus, the potential benefit of their combined use in reducing vasospasm risk remains underexplored.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a systematic search on PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus databases to identify relevant studies discussing double drainage systems in patients with severe aSAH-hydrocephalus. The search algorithm retrieved 1341 results. At the end of the exclusion phase, we included 4 studies in the final analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We included 148 patients with post-aSAH hydrocephalus treated using dual CSF drainage. Treatment was reported in about 2/3 of patients and endovascular repair was in most of them. LD was typically placed early, though timing protocols varied. Drainage was maintained on average 0.5–16 days, with continuous drainage being most common. Complication rates varied: ischemia was reported in 18.9 % of patients, while vasospasm occurred in 22.3 % of cases when assessed clinically or angiographically. CSF infection was reported in up to 31.6 % of cases. Functional outcomes were generally favorable, with mean mRS scores at follow-up ranging from 1.0 to 2.4, depending on initial clinical severity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patients with aSAH may benefit of dual CSF drainage, especially in case of massive bleeding. Preliminary data suggest that it may reduce vasospasm and improve outcomes by enhancing CSF clearance. However, the evidence is still limited by study variability and lack of direct comparisons. Until more data emerge, dual drainage should be reserved for high-risk patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15487,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience","volume":"139 ","pages":"Article 111442"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing cerebrospinal fluid clearance in subarachnoid hemorrhage: A systematic review of combined ventricular and lumbar drainage\",\"authors\":\"Matteo Palermo , Sonia D’Arrigo , Alessio Albanese , Carmelo Lucio Sturiale\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111442\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is a severe type of stroke associated with high rates of mortality and morbidity. Two major complications following aSAH are acute hydrocephalus and delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) caused by severe vasospasm. While external ventricular drainage and lumbar drainage (LD) are typically used separately to manage hydrocephalus, the potential benefit of their combined use in reducing vasospasm risk remains underexplored.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a systematic search on PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus databases to identify relevant studies discussing double drainage systems in patients with severe aSAH-hydrocephalus. The search algorithm retrieved 1341 results. At the end of the exclusion phase, we included 4 studies in the final analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We included 148 patients with post-aSAH hydrocephalus treated using dual CSF drainage. Treatment was reported in about 2/3 of patients and endovascular repair was in most of them. LD was typically placed early, though timing protocols varied. Drainage was maintained on average 0.5–16 days, with continuous drainage being most common. Complication rates varied: ischemia was reported in 18.9 % of patients, while vasospasm occurred in 22.3 % of cases when assessed clinically or angiographically. CSF infection was reported in up to 31.6 % of cases. Functional outcomes were generally favorable, with mean mRS scores at follow-up ranging from 1.0 to 2.4, depending on initial clinical severity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patients with aSAH may benefit of dual CSF drainage, especially in case of massive bleeding. Preliminary data suggest that it may reduce vasospasm and improve outcomes by enhancing CSF clearance. However, the evidence is still limited by study variability and lack of direct comparisons. Until more data emerge, dual drainage should be reserved for high-risk patients.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15487,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"139 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111442\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967586825004151\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967586825004151","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Enhancing cerebrospinal fluid clearance in subarachnoid hemorrhage: A systematic review of combined ventricular and lumbar drainage
Introduction
Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is a severe type of stroke associated with high rates of mortality and morbidity. Two major complications following aSAH are acute hydrocephalus and delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) caused by severe vasospasm. While external ventricular drainage and lumbar drainage (LD) are typically used separately to manage hydrocephalus, the potential benefit of their combined use in reducing vasospasm risk remains underexplored.
Methods
We conducted a systematic search on PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus databases to identify relevant studies discussing double drainage systems in patients with severe aSAH-hydrocephalus. The search algorithm retrieved 1341 results. At the end of the exclusion phase, we included 4 studies in the final analysis.
Results
We included 148 patients with post-aSAH hydrocephalus treated using dual CSF drainage. Treatment was reported in about 2/3 of patients and endovascular repair was in most of them. LD was typically placed early, though timing protocols varied. Drainage was maintained on average 0.5–16 days, with continuous drainage being most common. Complication rates varied: ischemia was reported in 18.9 % of patients, while vasospasm occurred in 22.3 % of cases when assessed clinically or angiographically. CSF infection was reported in up to 31.6 % of cases. Functional outcomes were generally favorable, with mean mRS scores at follow-up ranging from 1.0 to 2.4, depending on initial clinical severity.
Conclusion
Patients with aSAH may benefit of dual CSF drainage, especially in case of massive bleeding. Preliminary data suggest that it may reduce vasospasm and improve outcomes by enhancing CSF clearance. However, the evidence is still limited by study variability and lack of direct comparisons. Until more data emerge, dual drainage should be reserved for high-risk patients.
期刊介绍:
This International journal, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, publishes articles on clinical neurosurgery and neurology and the related neurosciences such as neuro-pathology, neuro-radiology, neuro-ophthalmology and neuro-physiology.
The journal has a broad International perspective, and emphasises the advances occurring in Asia, the Pacific Rim region, Europe and North America. The Journal acts as a focus for publication of major clinical and laboratory research, as well as publishing solicited manuscripts on specific subjects from experts, case reports and other information of interest to clinicians working in the clinical neurosciences.