通过运动塑造注意力:入侵型运动玩家基于特征的选择性注意增强

IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q2 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
Luca Bovolon , Simona Perrone , Carlotta Lega , Luisa Girelli , Simone Mattavelli , Marco A. Petilli
{"title":"通过运动塑造注意力:入侵型运动玩家基于特征的选择性注意增强","authors":"Luca Bovolon ,&nbsp;Simona Perrone ,&nbsp;Carlotta Lega ,&nbsp;Luisa Girelli ,&nbsp;Simone Mattavelli ,&nbsp;Marco A. Petilli","doi":"10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.102929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Prolonged engagement in sports that place high demands on cognitive functions may result in perceptual and cognitive enhancements. However, empirical evidence on the effect of sport-specific constraints on attentional mechanisms remains limited. Here, we address this gap with two experiments that examine how cognitive demands posed by different sports (invasion and non-invasion) affect two subcomponents of selective attention – feature-based (FBA) and spatial-based (SBA). In Experiment 1, 20 invasion sport athletes and 20 gender-matched controls completed a visual search task and a flanker task to assess FBA and SBA, respectively. Our results showed that invasion sports athletes exhibit enhanced task-specific feature-based attentional skills in the initial stages of the visual search task. Conversely, no group differences emerged in the flanker task, suggesting that invasion sports practice effect is specific to FBA rather than to general selective attention. In Experiment 2, we investigated whether this effect was related to sport type. To do so, we replicated Experiment 1 with 22 non-invasion sport athletes and 23 gender-matched controls. The results did not reveal any group difference in measures of FBA and SBA. These findings indicate that invasion sports practice selectively enhances FBA, suggesting that sport-specific cognitive demands shape and refine cognitive abilities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54536,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Sport and Exercise","volume":"80 ","pages":"Article 102929"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Playing sports to shape attention: enhanced feature-based selective attention in invasion sports players\",\"authors\":\"Luca Bovolon ,&nbsp;Simona Perrone ,&nbsp;Carlotta Lega ,&nbsp;Luisa Girelli ,&nbsp;Simone Mattavelli ,&nbsp;Marco A. Petilli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.102929\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Prolonged engagement in sports that place high demands on cognitive functions may result in perceptual and cognitive enhancements. However, empirical evidence on the effect of sport-specific constraints on attentional mechanisms remains limited. Here, we address this gap with two experiments that examine how cognitive demands posed by different sports (invasion and non-invasion) affect two subcomponents of selective attention – feature-based (FBA) and spatial-based (SBA). In Experiment 1, 20 invasion sport athletes and 20 gender-matched controls completed a visual search task and a flanker task to assess FBA and SBA, respectively. Our results showed that invasion sports athletes exhibit enhanced task-specific feature-based attentional skills in the initial stages of the visual search task. Conversely, no group differences emerged in the flanker task, suggesting that invasion sports practice effect is specific to FBA rather than to general selective attention. In Experiment 2, we investigated whether this effect was related to sport type. To do so, we replicated Experiment 1 with 22 non-invasion sport athletes and 23 gender-matched controls. The results did not reveal any group difference in measures of FBA and SBA. These findings indicate that invasion sports practice selectively enhances FBA, suggesting that sport-specific cognitive demands shape and refine cognitive abilities.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54536,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology of Sport and Exercise\",\"volume\":\"80 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102929\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology of Sport and Exercise\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1469029225001281\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology of Sport and Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1469029225001281","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

长期从事对认知功能有高要求的运动可能会导致知觉和认知能力的增强。然而,关于运动特定约束对注意机制影响的经验证据仍然有限。在这里,我们通过两个实验来解决这一差距,这些实验研究了不同运动(入侵和非入侵)所带来的认知需求如何影响选择性注意的两个子组件-基于特征的(FBA)和基于空间的(SBA)。实验1中,20名侵略运动运动员和20名性别匹配的对照组分别完成视觉搜索任务和侧卫任务来评估FBA和SBA。我们的研究结果表明,侵略运动运动员在视觉搜索任务的初始阶段表现出增强的基于任务特定特征的注意技能。相反,在侧卫任务中没有出现组间差异,这表明入侵运动练习效应是FBA特有的,而不是一般的选择性注意。在实验2中,我们考察了这种效应是否与运动类型有关。为此,我们在22名非侵入性运动运动员和23名性别匹配的对照组中重复了实验1。结果显示FBA和SBA的测量没有任何组间差异。这些发现表明,侵入性运动练习选择性地增强了FBA,表明运动特异性认知需求塑造和完善了认知能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Playing sports to shape attention: enhanced feature-based selective attention in invasion sports players
Prolonged engagement in sports that place high demands on cognitive functions may result in perceptual and cognitive enhancements. However, empirical evidence on the effect of sport-specific constraints on attentional mechanisms remains limited. Here, we address this gap with two experiments that examine how cognitive demands posed by different sports (invasion and non-invasion) affect two subcomponents of selective attention – feature-based (FBA) and spatial-based (SBA). In Experiment 1, 20 invasion sport athletes and 20 gender-matched controls completed a visual search task and a flanker task to assess FBA and SBA, respectively. Our results showed that invasion sports athletes exhibit enhanced task-specific feature-based attentional skills in the initial stages of the visual search task. Conversely, no group differences emerged in the flanker task, suggesting that invasion sports practice effect is specific to FBA rather than to general selective attention. In Experiment 2, we investigated whether this effect was related to sport type. To do so, we replicated Experiment 1 with 22 non-invasion sport athletes and 23 gender-matched controls. The results did not reveal any group difference in measures of FBA and SBA. These findings indicate that invasion sports practice selectively enhances FBA, suggesting that sport-specific cognitive demands shape and refine cognitive abilities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
172
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Psychology of Sport and Exercise is an international forum for scholarly reports in the psychology of sport and exercise, broadly defined. The journal is open to the use of diverse methodological approaches. Manuscripts that will be considered for publication will present results from high quality empirical research, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, commentaries concerning already published PSE papers or topics of general interest for PSE readers, protocol papers for trials, and reports of professional practice (which will need to demonstrate academic rigour and go beyond mere description). The CONSORT guidelines consort-statement need to be followed for protocol papers for trials; authors should present a flow diagramme and attach with their cover letter the CONSORT checklist. For meta-analysis, the PRISMA prisma-statement guidelines should be followed; authors should present a flow diagramme and attach with their cover letter the PRISMA checklist. For systematic reviews it is recommended that the PRISMA guidelines are followed, although it is not compulsory. Authors interested in submitting replications of published studies need to contact the Editors-in-Chief before they start their replication. We are not interested in manuscripts that aim to test the psychometric properties of an existing scale from English to another language, unless new validation methods are used which address previously unanswered research questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信