Mostafa Papi, Yiran Zhang, Yang Zhou, Claudia J Kim, Mahshid Mahbodi, Mijin Eom, Chen Jiang
{"title":"调节焦点与契合对任务投入的影响:实验研究","authors":"Mostafa Papi, Yiran Zhang, Yang Zhou, Claudia J Kim, Mahshid Mahbodi, Mijin Eom, Chen Jiang","doi":"10.1093/applin/amaf035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the effects of learners’ regulatory focus, task type, and the match/mismatch between the two on task engagement. Eighty-five learners of English as a second language at a US-American university completed a regulatory focus questionnaire, an English proficiency self-assessment, one task with a promotion focus (requiring creativity and imagination), one task with a prevention focus (requiring attention to detail and accuracy), and finally a post-task engagement questionnaire. Results showed that (1) the promotion task resulted in significantly higher levels of task enjoyment, whereas the prevention task led to higher cognitive engagement; (2) learners’ prevention focus positively predicted task anxiety in both tasks and negatively predicted task enjoyment in the promotion task, whereas the promotion focus positively predicted task enjoyment in the promotion task; and finally, (3) prevention-focused learners experienced greater enjoyment in the prevention task (matching) than in the promotion (mismatching) task, whereas promotion-focused learners experienced more enjoyment in the promotion (matching) task than in the prevention task (mismatching) supporting regulatory fit predictions. The results highlight the importance of regulatory focus and fit in task engagement.","PeriodicalId":48234,"journal":{"name":"Applied Linguistics","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regulatory focus and fit effects on task engagement: An experimental study\",\"authors\":\"Mostafa Papi, Yiran Zhang, Yang Zhou, Claudia J Kim, Mahshid Mahbodi, Mijin Eom, Chen Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/applin/amaf035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examined the effects of learners’ regulatory focus, task type, and the match/mismatch between the two on task engagement. Eighty-five learners of English as a second language at a US-American university completed a regulatory focus questionnaire, an English proficiency self-assessment, one task with a promotion focus (requiring creativity and imagination), one task with a prevention focus (requiring attention to detail and accuracy), and finally a post-task engagement questionnaire. Results showed that (1) the promotion task resulted in significantly higher levels of task enjoyment, whereas the prevention task led to higher cognitive engagement; (2) learners’ prevention focus positively predicted task anxiety in both tasks and negatively predicted task enjoyment in the promotion task, whereas the promotion focus positively predicted task enjoyment in the promotion task; and finally, (3) prevention-focused learners experienced greater enjoyment in the prevention task (matching) than in the promotion (mismatching) task, whereas promotion-focused learners experienced more enjoyment in the promotion (matching) task than in the prevention task (mismatching) supporting regulatory fit predictions. The results highlight the importance of regulatory focus and fit in task engagement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amaf035\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amaf035","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Regulatory focus and fit effects on task engagement: An experimental study
This study examined the effects of learners’ regulatory focus, task type, and the match/mismatch between the two on task engagement. Eighty-five learners of English as a second language at a US-American university completed a regulatory focus questionnaire, an English proficiency self-assessment, one task with a promotion focus (requiring creativity and imagination), one task with a prevention focus (requiring attention to detail and accuracy), and finally a post-task engagement questionnaire. Results showed that (1) the promotion task resulted in significantly higher levels of task enjoyment, whereas the prevention task led to higher cognitive engagement; (2) learners’ prevention focus positively predicted task anxiety in both tasks and negatively predicted task enjoyment in the promotion task, whereas the promotion focus positively predicted task enjoyment in the promotion task; and finally, (3) prevention-focused learners experienced greater enjoyment in the prevention task (matching) than in the promotion (mismatching) task, whereas promotion-focused learners experienced more enjoyment in the promotion (matching) task than in the prevention task (mismatching) supporting regulatory fit predictions. The results highlight the importance of regulatory focus and fit in task engagement.
期刊介绍:
Applied Linguistics publishes research into language with relevance to real-world problems. The journal is keen to help make connections between fields, theories, research methods, and scholarly discourses, and welcomes contributions which critically reflect on current practices in applied linguistic research. It promotes scholarly and scientific discussion of issues that unite or divide scholars in applied linguistics. It is less interested in the ad hoc solution of particular problems and more interested in the handling of problems in a principled way by reference to theoretical studies.