Jingya Xin, Jingfan Shao, Xiaohan Yu, Wei Huang, Yanguang Li
{"title":"解读牺牲剂在光催化H2O2生产中有争议的作用:促进剂还是人工制品的来源?","authors":"Jingya Xin, Jingfan Shao, Xiaohan Yu, Wei Huang, Yanguang Li","doi":"10.1021/acsenergylett.5c01771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Photocatalytic H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> synthesis holds great promise for sustainable H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> production. While extensive efforts have focused on optimizing catalysts and reaction conditions to enhance H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> yields, the accuracy of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> quantification─a fundamental prerequisite for reliable performance evaluation─remains underexplored. Conventional colorimetric methods can be compromised by the widespread use of organic sacrificial agents due to their intrinsic redox activity and optical absorption properties. Herein, we systematically investigate the interference effects of common sacrificial agents and their oxidation products on H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> quantification across several established colorimetric assays. Our results reveal that quantification inaccuracies arise from a combination of factors, including pre-existing H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> contamination, spectral overlap, unintended redox reactions, and self-sensitization effects. Drawing from these findings, we propose practical guidelines for selecting compatible sacrificial agents, detection methods, and excitation wavelengths to minimize analytical artifacts and enable accurate evaluation of photocatalytic H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> production.","PeriodicalId":16,"journal":{"name":"ACS Energy Letters ","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":19.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deciphering the Controversial Role of Sacrificial Agents in Photocatalytic H2O2 Production: Promoters or Source of Artifacts?\",\"authors\":\"Jingya Xin, Jingfan Shao, Xiaohan Yu, Wei Huang, Yanguang Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acsenergylett.5c01771\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Photocatalytic H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> synthesis holds great promise for sustainable H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> production. While extensive efforts have focused on optimizing catalysts and reaction conditions to enhance H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> yields, the accuracy of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> quantification─a fundamental prerequisite for reliable performance evaluation─remains underexplored. Conventional colorimetric methods can be compromised by the widespread use of organic sacrificial agents due to their intrinsic redox activity and optical absorption properties. Herein, we systematically investigate the interference effects of common sacrificial agents and their oxidation products on H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> quantification across several established colorimetric assays. Our results reveal that quantification inaccuracies arise from a combination of factors, including pre-existing H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> contamination, spectral overlap, unintended redox reactions, and self-sensitization effects. Drawing from these findings, we propose practical guidelines for selecting compatible sacrificial agents, detection methods, and excitation wavelengths to minimize analytical artifacts and enable accurate evaluation of photocatalytic H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> production.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Energy Letters \",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":19.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Energy Letters \",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.5c01771\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Energy Letters ","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.5c01771","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Deciphering the Controversial Role of Sacrificial Agents in Photocatalytic H2O2 Production: Promoters or Source of Artifacts?
Photocatalytic H2O2 synthesis holds great promise for sustainable H2O2 production. While extensive efforts have focused on optimizing catalysts and reaction conditions to enhance H2O2 yields, the accuracy of H2O2 quantification─a fundamental prerequisite for reliable performance evaluation─remains underexplored. Conventional colorimetric methods can be compromised by the widespread use of organic sacrificial agents due to their intrinsic redox activity and optical absorption properties. Herein, we systematically investigate the interference effects of common sacrificial agents and their oxidation products on H2O2 quantification across several established colorimetric assays. Our results reveal that quantification inaccuracies arise from a combination of factors, including pre-existing H2O2 contamination, spectral overlap, unintended redox reactions, and self-sensitization effects. Drawing from these findings, we propose practical guidelines for selecting compatible sacrificial agents, detection methods, and excitation wavelengths to minimize analytical artifacts and enable accurate evaluation of photocatalytic H2O2 production.
ACS Energy Letters Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
469
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍:
ACS Energy Letters is a monthly journal that publishes papers reporting new scientific advances in energy research. The journal focuses on topics that are of interest to scientists working in the fundamental and applied sciences. Rapid publication is a central criterion for acceptance, and the journal is known for its quick publication times, with an average of 4-6 weeks from submission to web publication in As Soon As Publishable format.
ACS Energy Letters is ranked as the number one journal in the Web of Science Electrochemistry category. It also ranks within the top 10 journals for Physical Chemistry, Energy & Fuels, and Nanoscience & Nanotechnology.
The journal offers several types of articles, including Letters, Energy Express, Perspectives, Reviews, Editorials, Viewpoints and Energy Focus. Additionally, authors have the option to submit videos that summarize or support the information presented in a Perspective or Review article, which can be highlighted on the journal's website. ACS Energy Letters is abstracted and indexed in Chemical Abstracts Service/SciFinder, EBSCO-summon, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and Portico.