Ariane Lentice de Paula, Luis Miguel Schiebelbein, Regiane Kazmierczak Becker, Eduardo Augusto Agnellos Barbosa, Fabrício Tondello Barbosa, Carolina Weigert Galvão, Rafael Mazer Etto, Heverton Fernando Melo, Adriel Ferreira da Fonseca, Neyde Fabiola Balarezo Giarola
{"title":"巴西南部农业梯田免耕影响的土壤健康评估方法","authors":"Ariane Lentice de Paula, Luis Miguel Schiebelbein, Regiane Kazmierczak Becker, Eduardo Augusto Agnellos Barbosa, Fabrício Tondello Barbosa, Carolina Weigert Galvão, Rafael Mazer Etto, Heverton Fernando Melo, Adriel Ferreira da Fonseca, Neyde Fabiola Balarezo Giarola","doi":"10.5194/egusphere-2025-2583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Abstract.</strong> Soil health assessment depends on the appropriate selection of indicators and robust, sensitive methods for its determination. In this study, four integrative approaches were evaluated to assess the impacts of no-till with and without agricultural terraces on soil health in Southern Brazil. The different methods used were: (1) Principal Component Analysis (PCA); (2) expert opinion (EO); (2) FERTBIO; and (4) Soil Management Assessment Framework (SMAF). All approaches followed four steps: (i) selection of indicators; (ii) interpretation of indicators; (iii) integration of indicators; and (iv) calculation of soil health indices. The methods varied in the steps of indicator selection, interpretation, and the method of indicator integration. The indicators used included physical (bulk density, total porosity, soil penetration resistance, and water retention capacity), chemical (pH, calcium, phosphorus, potassium, organic matter, CEC, and base saturation), and biological indicators (microbial biomass carbon, β-glucosidase, and arylsulfatase). Crop yield was evaluated for maize (2019/20 and 2021/22 harvests), wheat (2021 harvest), and soybean (2020/21 harvest). Descriptive statistics, median comparisons, principal component analysis and spearman correlation analysis were applied for the analysis of results. The results showed that only the EO and FERTBIO approaches were sensitive enough to detect differences in soil health between management systems, indicating that no-till with terraces had better soil health. Biological indicators were more sensitive in differentiating treatments, showing a rapid response in the short term. Maize (2019/20 harvest) and wheat (2021 harvest) yields were higher under the no-till with terraces treatment. Over time, yield showed a stronger relationship with soil health. The results highlight the importance of selecting appropriate indicators for soil health assessment and reinforce the benefits of agricultural terracing for the sustainability of production systems.","PeriodicalId":48610,"journal":{"name":"Soil","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Soil health approaches to assess the impacts of no-tillage with agricultural terraces in southern Brazil\",\"authors\":\"Ariane Lentice de Paula, Luis Miguel Schiebelbein, Regiane Kazmierczak Becker, Eduardo Augusto Agnellos Barbosa, Fabrício Tondello Barbosa, Carolina Weigert Galvão, Rafael Mazer Etto, Heverton Fernando Melo, Adriel Ferreira da Fonseca, Neyde Fabiola Balarezo Giarola\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/egusphere-2025-2583\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<strong>Abstract.</strong> Soil health assessment depends on the appropriate selection of indicators and robust, sensitive methods for its determination. In this study, four integrative approaches were evaluated to assess the impacts of no-till with and without agricultural terraces on soil health in Southern Brazil. The different methods used were: (1) Principal Component Analysis (PCA); (2) expert opinion (EO); (2) FERTBIO; and (4) Soil Management Assessment Framework (SMAF). All approaches followed four steps: (i) selection of indicators; (ii) interpretation of indicators; (iii) integration of indicators; and (iv) calculation of soil health indices. The methods varied in the steps of indicator selection, interpretation, and the method of indicator integration. The indicators used included physical (bulk density, total porosity, soil penetration resistance, and water retention capacity), chemical (pH, calcium, phosphorus, potassium, organic matter, CEC, and base saturation), and biological indicators (microbial biomass carbon, β-glucosidase, and arylsulfatase). Crop yield was evaluated for maize (2019/20 and 2021/22 harvests), wheat (2021 harvest), and soybean (2020/21 harvest). Descriptive statistics, median comparisons, principal component analysis and spearman correlation analysis were applied for the analysis of results. The results showed that only the EO and FERTBIO approaches were sensitive enough to detect differences in soil health between management systems, indicating that no-till with terraces had better soil health. Biological indicators were more sensitive in differentiating treatments, showing a rapid response in the short term. Maize (2019/20 harvest) and wheat (2021 harvest) yields were higher under the no-till with terraces treatment. Over time, yield showed a stronger relationship with soil health. The results highlight the importance of selecting appropriate indicators for soil health assessment and reinforce the benefits of agricultural terracing for the sustainability of production systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2583\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2583","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Soil health approaches to assess the impacts of no-tillage with agricultural terraces in southern Brazil
Abstract. Soil health assessment depends on the appropriate selection of indicators and robust, sensitive methods for its determination. In this study, four integrative approaches were evaluated to assess the impacts of no-till with and without agricultural terraces on soil health in Southern Brazil. The different methods used were: (1) Principal Component Analysis (PCA); (2) expert opinion (EO); (2) FERTBIO; and (4) Soil Management Assessment Framework (SMAF). All approaches followed four steps: (i) selection of indicators; (ii) interpretation of indicators; (iii) integration of indicators; and (iv) calculation of soil health indices. The methods varied in the steps of indicator selection, interpretation, and the method of indicator integration. The indicators used included physical (bulk density, total porosity, soil penetration resistance, and water retention capacity), chemical (pH, calcium, phosphorus, potassium, organic matter, CEC, and base saturation), and biological indicators (microbial biomass carbon, β-glucosidase, and arylsulfatase). Crop yield was evaluated for maize (2019/20 and 2021/22 harvests), wheat (2021 harvest), and soybean (2020/21 harvest). Descriptive statistics, median comparisons, principal component analysis and spearman correlation analysis were applied for the analysis of results. The results showed that only the EO and FERTBIO approaches were sensitive enough to detect differences in soil health between management systems, indicating that no-till with terraces had better soil health. Biological indicators were more sensitive in differentiating treatments, showing a rapid response in the short term. Maize (2019/20 harvest) and wheat (2021 harvest) yields were higher under the no-till with terraces treatment. Over time, yield showed a stronger relationship with soil health. The results highlight the importance of selecting appropriate indicators for soil health assessment and reinforce the benefits of agricultural terracing for the sustainability of production systems.
SoilAgricultural and Biological Sciences-Soil Science
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
44
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍:
SOIL is an international scientific journal dedicated to the publication and discussion of high-quality research in the field of soil system sciences.
SOIL is at the interface between the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, and biosphere. SOIL publishes scientific research that contributes to understanding the soil system and its interaction with humans and the entire Earth system. The scope of the journal includes all topics that fall within the study of soil science as a discipline, with an emphasis on studies that integrate soil science with other sciences (hydrology, agronomy, socio-economics, health sciences, atmospheric sciences, etc.).