Ahmed Khattak, Danny Ruta, Vivek Patkar, Rick Popert, Jonathan Makanjuola, Martha Martin, Lesedi Ledwaba‐Chapman, Kate Dodgson, Robert Oldroyd, Jonathan Noel, Paul Cathcart, Simon Hughes, Ben Challacombe, Deborah Josephs, Deborah Enting, Elias Pintus, Ruth McCarthy, Majid Kazmi
{"title":"人工智能驱动的精简前列腺癌多学科团队建议在英国三级NHS中心","authors":"Ahmed Khattak, Danny Ruta, Vivek Patkar, Rick Popert, Jonathan Makanjuola, Martha Martin, Lesedi Ledwaba‐Chapman, Kate Dodgson, Robert Oldroyd, Jonathan Noel, Paul Cathcart, Simon Hughes, Ben Challacombe, Deborah Josephs, Deborah Enting, Elias Pintus, Ruth McCarthy, Majid Kazmi","doi":"10.1111/bju.16845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectivesTo evaluate the effectiveness of a rules‐based artificial intelligence (AI) clinical decision support system (CDSS) called the PROState AI Cancer‐Decision Support (PROSAIC‐DS) in streamlining the prostate cancer multidisciplinary team (MDT) pathway by identifying patients meeting standard of care (SoC) guidelines for reduced discussion in MDT meetings.Subjects/Patients and MethodsThis study consisted of two phases. Phase one involved a retrospective concordance analysis of 287 patients referred to the prostate MDT at King's College Hospital over a 2‐year period. In phase two, a prospective analysis included 416 patients from Guy's Hospital over another 2‐year period. Clinical treatment recommendations were independently reviewed by a panel of urologists and oncologists to establish a ‘ground truth.’ Concordance between the medical recommendations and those generated by the PROSAIC‐DS was assessed.ResultsIn phase one, the overall concordance between the clinicians’ recommendations and the PROSAIC‐DS was 92% (95% confidence interval [CI] 88.1–94.7%), compared to just 53% (95% CI 47–59%) with historic MDT outputs (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> < 0.01). In phase two, the PROSAIC‐DS achieved an 85.6% concordance (95% CI 81.6–88.9%) with the MDT recommendations for 355 evaluable cases (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> < 0.01). Notably, using a machine learning‐derived decision tree enabled the identification of 93 patients for streamlined management, demonstrating a 97.8% concordance in this subgroup (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> < 0.01).ConclusionThe implementation of the PROSAIC‐DS into the prostate cancer MDT pathway allowed 33.8% of patients to bypass MDT discussions with high treatment concordance. This study showcases the potential for AI‐based solutions to improve clinical workflow and patient management in oncology, thus addressing the workload challenges faced by MDTs.","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence‐driven streamlining of prostate cancer multidisciplinary team recommendations in a tertiary NHS centre in the UK\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Khattak, Danny Ruta, Vivek Patkar, Rick Popert, Jonathan Makanjuola, Martha Martin, Lesedi Ledwaba‐Chapman, Kate Dodgson, Robert Oldroyd, Jonathan Noel, Paul Cathcart, Simon Hughes, Ben Challacombe, Deborah Josephs, Deborah Enting, Elias Pintus, Ruth McCarthy, Majid Kazmi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bju.16845\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ObjectivesTo evaluate the effectiveness of a rules‐based artificial intelligence (AI) clinical decision support system (CDSS) called the PROState AI Cancer‐Decision Support (PROSAIC‐DS) in streamlining the prostate cancer multidisciplinary team (MDT) pathway by identifying patients meeting standard of care (SoC) guidelines for reduced discussion in MDT meetings.Subjects/Patients and MethodsThis study consisted of two phases. Phase one involved a retrospective concordance analysis of 287 patients referred to the prostate MDT at King's College Hospital over a 2‐year period. In phase two, a prospective analysis included 416 patients from Guy's Hospital over another 2‐year period. Clinical treatment recommendations were independently reviewed by a panel of urologists and oncologists to establish a ‘ground truth.’ Concordance between the medical recommendations and those generated by the PROSAIC‐DS was assessed.ResultsIn phase one, the overall concordance between the clinicians’ recommendations and the PROSAIC‐DS was 92% (95% confidence interval [CI] 88.1–94.7%), compared to just 53% (95% CI 47–59%) with historic MDT outputs (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> < 0.01). In phase two, the PROSAIC‐DS achieved an 85.6% concordance (95% CI 81.6–88.9%) with the MDT recommendations for 355 evaluable cases (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> < 0.01). Notably, using a machine learning‐derived decision tree enabled the identification of 93 patients for streamlined management, demonstrating a 97.8% concordance in this subgroup (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> < 0.01).ConclusionThe implementation of the PROSAIC‐DS into the prostate cancer MDT pathway allowed 33.8% of patients to bypass MDT discussions with high treatment concordance. This study showcases the potential for AI‐based solutions to improve clinical workflow and patient management in oncology, thus addressing the workload challenges faced by MDTs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJU International\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJU International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16845\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJU International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16845","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的评估基于规则的人工智能(AI)临床决策支持系统(CDSS)的有效性,该系统称为前列腺AI癌症决策支持(proaic‐DS),通过识别符合护理标准(SoC)指南的患者,减少MDT会议上的讨论,简化前列腺癌多学科团队(MDT)途径。研究对象/患者及方法本研究分为两个阶段。第一阶段涉及对国王学院医院2年内287例前列腺MDT患者的回顾性一致性分析。在第二阶段,一项前瞻性分析包括来自盖伊医院的416名患者,为期2年。临床治疗建议由泌尿科医生和肿瘤科医生组成的小组独立审查,以确定“基本事实”。评估了医学建议与proaic‐DS生成的建议之间的一致性。结果在第一阶段,临床医生的建议与proaic‐DS之间的总体一致性为92%(95%置信区间[CI] 88.1-94.7%),而与历史MDT输出相比,只有53% (95% CI 47-59%)。0.01)。在第二阶段,在355例可评估病例中,proaic‐DS与MDT推荐的一致性达到85.6% (95% CI 81.6-88.9%)。0.01)。值得注意的是,使用机器学习衍生的决策树能够识别93例患者进行简化管理,显示该亚组的一致性为97.8% (P <;0.01)。结论将proaic‐DS应用于前列腺癌MDT通路,使33.8%的患者绕过MDT讨论,治疗一致性高。这项研究展示了基于人工智能的解决方案在改善肿瘤学临床工作流程和患者管理方面的潜力,从而解决了mdt面临的工作量挑战。
Artificial intelligence‐driven streamlining of prostate cancer multidisciplinary team recommendations in a tertiary NHS centre in the UK
ObjectivesTo evaluate the effectiveness of a rules‐based artificial intelligence (AI) clinical decision support system (CDSS) called the PROState AI Cancer‐Decision Support (PROSAIC‐DS) in streamlining the prostate cancer multidisciplinary team (MDT) pathway by identifying patients meeting standard of care (SoC) guidelines for reduced discussion in MDT meetings.Subjects/Patients and MethodsThis study consisted of two phases. Phase one involved a retrospective concordance analysis of 287 patients referred to the prostate MDT at King's College Hospital over a 2‐year period. In phase two, a prospective analysis included 416 patients from Guy's Hospital over another 2‐year period. Clinical treatment recommendations were independently reviewed by a panel of urologists and oncologists to establish a ‘ground truth.’ Concordance between the medical recommendations and those generated by the PROSAIC‐DS was assessed.ResultsIn phase one, the overall concordance between the clinicians’ recommendations and the PROSAIC‐DS was 92% (95% confidence interval [CI] 88.1–94.7%), compared to just 53% (95% CI 47–59%) with historic MDT outputs (P < 0.01). In phase two, the PROSAIC‐DS achieved an 85.6% concordance (95% CI 81.6–88.9%) with the MDT recommendations for 355 evaluable cases (P < 0.01). Notably, using a machine learning‐derived decision tree enabled the identification of 93 patients for streamlined management, demonstrating a 97.8% concordance in this subgroup (P < 0.01).ConclusionThe implementation of the PROSAIC‐DS into the prostate cancer MDT pathway allowed 33.8% of patients to bypass MDT discussions with high treatment concordance. This study showcases the potential for AI‐based solutions to improve clinical workflow and patient management in oncology, thus addressing the workload challenges faced by MDTs.
期刊介绍:
BJUI is one of the most highly respected medical journals in the world, with a truly international range of published papers and appeal. Every issue gives invaluable practical information in the form of original articles, reviews, comments, surgical education articles, and translational science articles in the field of urology. BJUI employs topical sections, and is in full colour, making it easier to browse or search for something specific.