John A. Treffalls , Victoria K. Hart , Connor McDonald , Lara Jones , Holly Keyt , Nitin A. Das , Edward Y. Sako
{"title":"双侧肺移植术后多模式疼痛控制的比较。","authors":"John A. Treffalls , Victoria K. Hart , Connor McDonald , Lara Jones , Holly Keyt , Nitin A. Das , Edward Y. Sako","doi":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.05.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Opioid administration is common following bilateral lung transplantation (BLTx) but is associated with adverse side effects and potential for opioid use disorder. This study aimed to compare the use of intercostal cryoablation, liposomal bupivacaine (LipoB), and standard therapy on patient-reported pain, opioid administration, and clinical outcomes following BLTx.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective review of all BLTx performed at a single center from January 2016 to December 2023 was performed. Due to varying surgeon preferences, patients received intraoperative cryoablation or LipoB in addition to systemic pain control measures or systemic measures only in the intra- or peri-operative period. Primary outcomes included patient-reported pain and the amount of opioid administration. Secondary outcomes included opioid-related complications and perioperative outcomes. Opioid administration was standardized using morphine milligram equivalents. Opioid levels and pain scores were predicted using a mixed-effects model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 153 patients included, 42.5% (<em>n</em> = 65) received systemic-only, 31.4% (<em>n</em> = 48) received LipoB, and 26.1% (<em>n</em> = 40) received cryoablation. Patients receiving cryoablation reported significantly lower pain through postoperative day 14 (<em>P</em> < .0001). Opioid administration was not different between groups (<em>P</em> = .107). Patients receiving cryoablation had lower rates of postoperative ileus (<em>P</em> = .004) but longer intensive care unit and postoperative length of stay (<em>P</em> < .001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Cryoablation was associated with a clinically significant reduction in patient-reported pain following BLTx. Significantly longer length of stay in the cryoablation group warrants future prospective, randomized investigation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23246,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation proceedings","volume":"57 6","pages":"Pages 1114-1119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Multimodal Pain Control Following Bilateral Lung Transplantation\",\"authors\":\"John A. Treffalls , Victoria K. Hart , Connor McDonald , Lara Jones , Holly Keyt , Nitin A. Das , Edward Y. Sako\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.05.023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Opioid administration is common following bilateral lung transplantation (BLTx) but is associated with adverse side effects and potential for opioid use disorder. This study aimed to compare the use of intercostal cryoablation, liposomal bupivacaine (LipoB), and standard therapy on patient-reported pain, opioid administration, and clinical outcomes following BLTx.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective review of all BLTx performed at a single center from January 2016 to December 2023 was performed. Due to varying surgeon preferences, patients received intraoperative cryoablation or LipoB in addition to systemic pain control measures or systemic measures only in the intra- or peri-operative period. Primary outcomes included patient-reported pain and the amount of opioid administration. Secondary outcomes included opioid-related complications and perioperative outcomes. Opioid administration was standardized using morphine milligram equivalents. Opioid levels and pain scores were predicted using a mixed-effects model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 153 patients included, 42.5% (<em>n</em> = 65) received systemic-only, 31.4% (<em>n</em> = 48) received LipoB, and 26.1% (<em>n</em> = 40) received cryoablation. Patients receiving cryoablation reported significantly lower pain through postoperative day 14 (<em>P</em> < .0001). Opioid administration was not different between groups (<em>P</em> = .107). Patients receiving cryoablation had lower rates of postoperative ileus (<em>P</em> = .004) but longer intensive care unit and postoperative length of stay (<em>P</em> < .001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Cryoablation was associated with a clinically significant reduction in patient-reported pain following BLTx. Significantly longer length of stay in the cryoablation group warrants future prospective, randomized investigation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplantation proceedings\",\"volume\":\"57 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1114-1119\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplantation proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041134525002957\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041134525002957","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of Multimodal Pain Control Following Bilateral Lung Transplantation
Purpose
Opioid administration is common following bilateral lung transplantation (BLTx) but is associated with adverse side effects and potential for opioid use disorder. This study aimed to compare the use of intercostal cryoablation, liposomal bupivacaine (LipoB), and standard therapy on patient-reported pain, opioid administration, and clinical outcomes following BLTx.
Methods
A retrospective review of all BLTx performed at a single center from January 2016 to December 2023 was performed. Due to varying surgeon preferences, patients received intraoperative cryoablation or LipoB in addition to systemic pain control measures or systemic measures only in the intra- or peri-operative period. Primary outcomes included patient-reported pain and the amount of opioid administration. Secondary outcomes included opioid-related complications and perioperative outcomes. Opioid administration was standardized using morphine milligram equivalents. Opioid levels and pain scores were predicted using a mixed-effects model.
Results
Of the 153 patients included, 42.5% (n = 65) received systemic-only, 31.4% (n = 48) received LipoB, and 26.1% (n = 40) received cryoablation. Patients receiving cryoablation reported significantly lower pain through postoperative day 14 (P < .0001). Opioid administration was not different between groups (P = .107). Patients receiving cryoablation had lower rates of postoperative ileus (P = .004) but longer intensive care unit and postoperative length of stay (P < .001).
Conclusion
Cryoablation was associated with a clinically significant reduction in patient-reported pain following BLTx. Significantly longer length of stay in the cryoablation group warrants future prospective, randomized investigation.
期刊介绍:
Transplantation Proceedings publishes several different categories of manuscripts, all of which undergo extensive peer review by recognized authorities in the field prior to their acceptance for publication.
The first type of manuscripts consists of sets of papers providing an in-depth expression of the current state of the art in various rapidly developing components of world transplantation biology and medicine. These manuscripts emanate from congresses of the affiliated transplantation societies, from Symposia sponsored by the Societies, as well as special Conferences and Workshops covering related topics.
Transplantation Proceedings also publishes several special sections including publication of Clinical Transplantation Proceedings, being rapid original contributions of preclinical and clinical experiences. These manuscripts undergo review by members of the Editorial Board.
Original basic or clinical science articles, clinical trials and case studies can be submitted to the journal?s open access companion title Transplantation Reports.