有更多的朋友与对社会排斥更敏感有关:神经和行为证据。

IF 3.1
Elisa C Baek, Yixuan Lisa Shen, Hairin Kim, Ekaterina Baldina, Jeanyung Chey, Yoosik Youm, Carolyn Parkinson
{"title":"有更多的朋友与对社会排斥更敏感有关:神经和行为证据。","authors":"Elisa C Baek, Yixuan Lisa Shen, Hairin Kim, Ekaterina Baldina, Jeanyung Chey, Yoosik Youm, Carolyn Parkinson","doi":"10.1093/scan/nsaf067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Social rejection profoundly affects well-being. How do features of people's real-world social networks relate to responses to social exclusion? People central in social networks-e.g., who have many friends-may be less distressed by exclusion, since they have many sources of support, or more sensitive to it, if they are more attuned to social feedback. We characterized a village's social network; a subset of residents (N = 74) completed an fMRI study involving social exclusion in groups characterized by varying social relationships (spouses, friends, strangers). Highly-central individuals reported greater distress during exclusion by strangers, and their distress ratings scaled with responses in brain regions associated with social pain, negative affect, and mentalizing. Thus, while social connectedness is often considered a protective factor that promotes well-being, these findings suggest a potential ironic effect of social connectedness-vulnerability to distress in particular social contexts. This sensitization to exclusion could constitute an adaptive tendency to promote long-term wellness.</p>","PeriodicalId":94208,"journal":{"name":"Social cognitive and affective neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Having more friends is associated with greater sensitization to social exclusion: Neural and behavioral evidence.\",\"authors\":\"Elisa C Baek, Yixuan Lisa Shen, Hairin Kim, Ekaterina Baldina, Jeanyung Chey, Yoosik Youm, Carolyn Parkinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/scan/nsaf067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Social rejection profoundly affects well-being. How do features of people's real-world social networks relate to responses to social exclusion? People central in social networks-e.g., who have many friends-may be less distressed by exclusion, since they have many sources of support, or more sensitive to it, if they are more attuned to social feedback. We characterized a village's social network; a subset of residents (N = 74) completed an fMRI study involving social exclusion in groups characterized by varying social relationships (spouses, friends, strangers). Highly-central individuals reported greater distress during exclusion by strangers, and their distress ratings scaled with responses in brain regions associated with social pain, negative affect, and mentalizing. Thus, while social connectedness is often considered a protective factor that promotes well-being, these findings suggest a potential ironic effect of social connectedness-vulnerability to distress in particular social contexts. This sensitization to exclusion could constitute an adaptive tendency to promote long-term wellness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94208,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social cognitive and affective neuroscience\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social cognitive and affective neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaf067\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social cognitive and affective neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaf067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社会排斥深刻地影响幸福感。人们现实社会网络的特征与社会排斥反应有何关系?在社交网络中处于中心位置的人。因为他们有很多支持的来源,或者如果他们更适应社会反馈,他们就会对被排斥更敏感。我们描述了一个村庄的社会网络;一组居民(N = 74)完成了一项功能磁共振成像研究,涉及以不同社会关系(配偶、朋友、陌生人)为特征的群体的社会排斥。高度集中的个体在被陌生人排斥时表现出更大的痛苦,他们的痛苦等级与大脑中与社交痛苦、负面影响和心理化相关的区域的反应有关。因此,虽然社会联系通常被认为是促进幸福的保护因素,但这些研究结果表明,社会联系具有潜在的讽刺作用——在特定的社会环境中容易受到痛苦。这种对排斥的敏感可能构成一种促进长期健康的适应性倾向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Having more friends is associated with greater sensitization to social exclusion: Neural and behavioral evidence.

Social rejection profoundly affects well-being. How do features of people's real-world social networks relate to responses to social exclusion? People central in social networks-e.g., who have many friends-may be less distressed by exclusion, since they have many sources of support, or more sensitive to it, if they are more attuned to social feedback. We characterized a village's social network; a subset of residents (N = 74) completed an fMRI study involving social exclusion in groups characterized by varying social relationships (spouses, friends, strangers). Highly-central individuals reported greater distress during exclusion by strangers, and their distress ratings scaled with responses in brain regions associated with social pain, negative affect, and mentalizing. Thus, while social connectedness is often considered a protective factor that promotes well-being, these findings suggest a potential ironic effect of social connectedness-vulnerability to distress in particular social contexts. This sensitization to exclusion could constitute an adaptive tendency to promote long-term wellness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信