Koji Takahashi, Hiroshi Ohyama, Motoyasu Kan, Mayu Ouchi, Hiroki Nagashima, Kohichiroh Okitsu, Izumi Ohno, Naoya Kato
{"title":"内镜逆行胆管造影治疗不可切除的恶性胆道门部梗阻时,首次与随后同时放置未覆盖金属支架的回顾性比较。","authors":"Koji Takahashi, Hiroshi Ohyama, Motoyasu Kan, Mayu Ouchi, Hiroki Nagashima, Kohichiroh Okitsu, Izumi Ohno, Naoya Kato","doi":"10.15403/jgld-5933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transpapillary simultaneous side-by-side (SBS) stenting using uncovered self-expandable metal stents (UCSEMSs) at the initial endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction (UMHBO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 67 patients with UMHBO who underwent simultaneous SBS stenting at our institution were retrospectively divided into two groups: the SBS stenting at the initial ERCP group (n=13) and the SBS stenting at the subsequent ERCP group (n=54). Clinical outcomes were compared between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences between the SBS stenting at the initial ERCP group and the SBS stenting at the subsequent ERCP group in procedural time (median: 50 vs. 40 minutes, p=0.31), functional success rate (69.2% vs. 83.3%, p=0.25), adverse event rate (30.8% vs. 14.8%, p=0.18), recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) rate (23.1% vs. 38.9%, p=0.29), technical success rate of re-intervention (100% vs. 90.5%, p=0.58), cumulative time to RBO (not reached vs. 252 days, p=0.80), or median overall survival (73 vs. 212 days, p=0.12).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Simultaneous SBS stenting using UCSEMSs at the initial ERCP is a safe and effective strategy for managing UMHBO, with outcomes comparable to those of SBS stenting performed at the subsequent ERCP.</p>","PeriodicalId":94081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gastrointestinal and liver diseases : JGLD","volume":"34 2","pages":"214-219"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrospective Comparison of Initial vs. Subsequent Simultaneous Side-by-Side Stenting with Uncovered Metal Stents during Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for Unresectable Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstructions.\",\"authors\":\"Koji Takahashi, Hiroshi Ohyama, Motoyasu Kan, Mayu Ouchi, Hiroki Nagashima, Kohichiroh Okitsu, Izumi Ohno, Naoya Kato\",\"doi\":\"10.15403/jgld-5933\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transpapillary simultaneous side-by-side (SBS) stenting using uncovered self-expandable metal stents (UCSEMSs) at the initial endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction (UMHBO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 67 patients with UMHBO who underwent simultaneous SBS stenting at our institution were retrospectively divided into two groups: the SBS stenting at the initial ERCP group (n=13) and the SBS stenting at the subsequent ERCP group (n=54). Clinical outcomes were compared between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences between the SBS stenting at the initial ERCP group and the SBS stenting at the subsequent ERCP group in procedural time (median: 50 vs. 40 minutes, p=0.31), functional success rate (69.2% vs. 83.3%, p=0.25), adverse event rate (30.8% vs. 14.8%, p=0.18), recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) rate (23.1% vs. 38.9%, p=0.29), technical success rate of re-intervention (100% vs. 90.5%, p=0.58), cumulative time to RBO (not reached vs. 252 days, p=0.80), or median overall survival (73 vs. 212 days, p=0.12).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Simultaneous SBS stenting using UCSEMSs at the initial ERCP is a safe and effective strategy for managing UMHBO, with outcomes comparable to those of SBS stenting performed at the subsequent ERCP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of gastrointestinal and liver diseases : JGLD\",\"volume\":\"34 2\",\"pages\":\"214-219\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of gastrointestinal and liver diseases : JGLD\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15403/jgld-5933\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gastrointestinal and liver diseases : JGLD","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15403/jgld-5933","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的:本研究旨在评估在初始内镜逆行胆管造影(ERCP)中使用无盖自膨胀金属支架(UCSEMSs)进行经毛细血管同时并排(SBS)支架治疗不可切除的恶性肝门胆道梗阻(UMHBO)的有效性和安全性。方法:回顾性将67例在我院同时行SBS支架置入的UMHBO患者分为两组:首次ERCP组SBS支架置入组(n=13)和随后ERCP组(n=54)。比较两组临床结果。结果:初始ERCP组SBS支架置入与后续ERCP组SBS支架置入在手术时间上无显著差异(中位数:50 vs. 40分钟,p=0.31),功能成功率(69.2% vs. 83.3%, p=0.25),不良事件发生率(30.8% vs. 14.8%, p=0.18),复发性胆道梗阻(RBO)率(23.1% vs. 38.9%, p=0.29),再干预技术成功率(100% vs. 90.5%, p=0.58),累计到RBO时间(未达到vs. 252天,p=0.80),或中位总生存期(73 vs. 212天,p=0.12)。结论:在最初的ERCP中使用UCSEMSs同时置入SBS支架是一种安全有效的治疗UMHBO的策略,其结果与在随后的ERCP中使用SBS支架的结果相当。
Retrospective Comparison of Initial vs. Subsequent Simultaneous Side-by-Side Stenting with Uncovered Metal Stents during Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for Unresectable Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstructions.
Background and aims: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transpapillary simultaneous side-by-side (SBS) stenting using uncovered self-expandable metal stents (UCSEMSs) at the initial endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction (UMHBO).
Methods: A total of 67 patients with UMHBO who underwent simultaneous SBS stenting at our institution were retrospectively divided into two groups: the SBS stenting at the initial ERCP group (n=13) and the SBS stenting at the subsequent ERCP group (n=54). Clinical outcomes were compared between the groups.
Results: There were no significant differences between the SBS stenting at the initial ERCP group and the SBS stenting at the subsequent ERCP group in procedural time (median: 50 vs. 40 minutes, p=0.31), functional success rate (69.2% vs. 83.3%, p=0.25), adverse event rate (30.8% vs. 14.8%, p=0.18), recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) rate (23.1% vs. 38.9%, p=0.29), technical success rate of re-intervention (100% vs. 90.5%, p=0.58), cumulative time to RBO (not reached vs. 252 days, p=0.80), or median overall survival (73 vs. 212 days, p=0.12).
Conclusions: Simultaneous SBS stenting using UCSEMSs at the initial ERCP is a safe and effective strategy for managing UMHBO, with outcomes comparable to those of SBS stenting performed at the subsequent ERCP.