塑料支架治疗胆总管结石不完全清除的有效性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2
Marco Valvano, Antonio Vinci, Filippo Antonini, Amedeo Montale, Annalisa Capannolo, Stefano Fabiani, Gianpiero Stefanelli, Marco Magistroni, Marta Mosca, Susanna Faenza, Fabio Ingravalle, Mariachiara Campanale, Maurici Massimo, Giovanni Latella
{"title":"塑料支架治疗胆总管结石不完全清除的有效性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Marco Valvano, Antonio Vinci, Filippo Antonini, Amedeo Montale, Annalisa Capannolo, Stefano Fabiani, Gianpiero Stefanelli, Marco Magistroni, Marta Mosca, Susanna Faenza, Fabio Ingravalle, Mariachiara Campanale, Maurici Massimo, Giovanni Latella","doi":"10.15403/jgld-5964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Common bile duct stones (CBDs) can typically be treated by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in 85-90% of cases. However, in the remaining 10-15% of patients, bile duct stones cannot be extracted. In such cases, the placement of a temporary biliary plastic stent is recommended.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023459712; October 2023). An electronic search was carried out using the following databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and CENTRAL (last search: October 20, 2023). All published studies (both randomized clinical trials and non-randomized interventional studies) involving patients who had undergone ERCP for CBDs with incomplete biliary clearance were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2.0 and ROBINS-I tools. The confidence in network meta-analysis tool was employed to estimate each study's contribution matrix within the network estimate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty papers (comprising 902 patients) were selected for qualitative and quantitative synthesis and were included in the standard meta-analysis, while only five studies (254 patients) were used for the network meta-analysis. The pooled success rate of stenting intervention in difficult choledocholithiasis was 79% (95% CI:71-87%). In the network meta-analysis model, ursodeoxycholic acid and single or double stenting resulted in a higher probability of being the most effective treatments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In cases of incomplete CBD clearance, the insertion of a temporary plastic stent achieves complete clearance in 79% of patients. Although not significantly superior in indirect comparison with stent alone, the adjunctive treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid appears to be the most likely to succeed.</p>","PeriodicalId":94081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gastrointestinal and liver diseases : JGLD","volume":"34 2","pages":"232-240"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Plastic Stent for the Treatment of Incomplete Clearance of Common Bile Duct Stone: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Marco Valvano, Antonio Vinci, Filippo Antonini, Amedeo Montale, Annalisa Capannolo, Stefano Fabiani, Gianpiero Stefanelli, Marco Magistroni, Marta Mosca, Susanna Faenza, Fabio Ingravalle, Mariachiara Campanale, Maurici Massimo, Giovanni Latella\",\"doi\":\"10.15403/jgld-5964\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Common bile duct stones (CBDs) can typically be treated by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in 85-90% of cases. However, in the remaining 10-15% of patients, bile duct stones cannot be extracted. In such cases, the placement of a temporary biliary plastic stent is recommended.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023459712; October 2023). An electronic search was carried out using the following databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and CENTRAL (last search: October 20, 2023). All published studies (both randomized clinical trials and non-randomized interventional studies) involving patients who had undergone ERCP for CBDs with incomplete biliary clearance were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2.0 and ROBINS-I tools. The confidence in network meta-analysis tool was employed to estimate each study's contribution matrix within the network estimate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty papers (comprising 902 patients) were selected for qualitative and quantitative synthesis and were included in the standard meta-analysis, while only five studies (254 patients) were used for the network meta-analysis. The pooled success rate of stenting intervention in difficult choledocholithiasis was 79% (95% CI:71-87%). In the network meta-analysis model, ursodeoxycholic acid and single or double stenting resulted in a higher probability of being the most effective treatments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In cases of incomplete CBD clearance, the insertion of a temporary plastic stent achieves complete clearance in 79% of patients. Although not significantly superior in indirect comparison with stent alone, the adjunctive treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid appears to be the most likely to succeed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of gastrointestinal and liver diseases : JGLD\",\"volume\":\"34 2\",\"pages\":\"232-240\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of gastrointestinal and liver diseases : JGLD\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15403/jgld-5964\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gastrointestinal and liver diseases : JGLD","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15403/jgld-5964","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:85-90%的病例可通过内镜逆行胆管造影(ERCP)治疗胆总管结石。然而,在其余10-15%的患者中,胆管结石无法取出。在这种情况下,建议放置临时胆道塑料支架。方法:我们进行了系统评价和荟萃分析(PROSPERO注册号:CRD42023459712;2023年10月)。电子检索使用以下数据库:PubMed/MEDLINE、Scopus和CENTRAL(最后检索日期:2023年10月20日)。所有已发表的研究(包括随机临床试验和非随机介入性研究)均包括接受ERCP治疗胆道不完全清除的CBDs患者。使用rob2.0和ROBINS-I工具评估偏倚风险。使用网络置信度元分析工具来估计每个研究在网络估计中的贡献矩阵。结果:选择20篇论文(902例患者)进行定性和定量综合,纳入标准荟萃分析,仅选择5篇研究(254例患者)进行网络荟萃分析。难治性胆总管结石支架置入术的总成功率为79% (95% CI:71-87%)。在网络meta分析模型中,熊去氧胆酸和单次或双次支架置入成为最有效治疗方法的概率更高。结论:在CBD不完全清除的病例中,79%的患者使用临时塑料支架完全清除。虽然与单独支架间接比较没有明显的优势,但熊去氧胆酸辅助治疗似乎最有可能成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of Plastic Stent for the Treatment of Incomplete Clearance of Common Bile Duct Stone: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Background and aims: Common bile duct stones (CBDs) can typically be treated by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in 85-90% of cases. However, in the remaining 10-15% of patients, bile duct stones cannot be extracted. In such cases, the placement of a temporary biliary plastic stent is recommended.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023459712; October 2023). An electronic search was carried out using the following databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and CENTRAL (last search: October 20, 2023). All published studies (both randomized clinical trials and non-randomized interventional studies) involving patients who had undergone ERCP for CBDs with incomplete biliary clearance were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2.0 and ROBINS-I tools. The confidence in network meta-analysis tool was employed to estimate each study's contribution matrix within the network estimate.

Results: Twenty papers (comprising 902 patients) were selected for qualitative and quantitative synthesis and were included in the standard meta-analysis, while only five studies (254 patients) were used for the network meta-analysis. The pooled success rate of stenting intervention in difficult choledocholithiasis was 79% (95% CI:71-87%). In the network meta-analysis model, ursodeoxycholic acid and single or double stenting resulted in a higher probability of being the most effective treatments.

Conclusions: In cases of incomplete CBD clearance, the insertion of a temporary plastic stent achieves complete clearance in 79% of patients. Although not significantly superior in indirect comparison with stent alone, the adjunctive treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid appears to be the most likely to succeed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信