乌干达结核病早期诊断临床风险评分的有效性和实施:一项实用的聚类随机临床试验。

Yeonsoo Baik, Muhammad Musoke, Amon Twinamasiko, Maureen Lamunu, Vivian Nabacwa, Agnes Sanyu, Katherine O Robsky, Joowhan Sung, Alex Kityamuwesi, Achilles Katamba, David W Dowdy
{"title":"乌干达结核病早期诊断临床风险评分的有效性和实施:一项实用的聚类随机临床试验。","authors":"Yeonsoo Baik, Muhammad Musoke, Amon Twinamasiko, Maureen Lamunu, Vivian Nabacwa, Agnes Sanyu, Katherine O Robsky, Joowhan Sung, Alex Kityamuwesi, Achilles Katamba, David W Dowdy","doi":"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202404-422OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Undertreatment of tuberculosis (TB) is common in resource-limited settings where same-day microbiological diagnosis is unavailable. We evaluated if a simple clinical risk score for predicting active TB could facilitate treatment initiation among individuals at high risk for TB. Methods We conducted a pragmatic, implementation-effectiveness study in peri-urban primary health clinics in Uganda. Four intervention clinics were paired with standard-of-care comparison clinics. Providers in intervention clinics were trained to use the score and set a threshold score for considering same-day treatment initiation; treatment decisions were at the providers' discretion. Our primary effectiveness outcome was the change in the proportion of individuals with confirmed TB who started on treatment within seven days of presentation, comparing pre-intervention and post-intervention periods. Results Among intervention clinics, 594/720 (83%) people diagnosed with TB started treatment within seven days during the pre-intervention period, versus 264/316 (84%) after implementation (pre-post difference 1%; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: -6, 8%). In comparison clinics, seven-day treatment initiation changed from 312/363 (86%) pre-intervention to 153/211 (73%) post-intervention (pre-post difference -13%; 95%CI: -22, -5%). A difference-in-differences estimate was 14% (95%CI: 10, 19%). In intervention clinics, 1,206 of 1,826 (66%) people presenting with TB symptoms were administered the risk score. 229 (19%) had a score above the treatment threshold and 105 (46%) initiated treatment on the same day. Conclusions An easy-to-use clinical risk score did not increase seven-day empiric treatment initiation in intervention clinics. However, it improved rapid treatment initiation relative to clinics using the prevailing standard-of-care. The score was also highly acceptable to clinical providers. Clinical trial registration available at www.clinicaltrials.gov, ID: __NCT05122624 __________.</p>","PeriodicalId":93876,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness and Implementation of A Clinical Risk Score for Early Diagnosis of Tuberculosis in Uganda: A Pragmatic, Clustered Randomization Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Yeonsoo Baik, Muhammad Musoke, Amon Twinamasiko, Maureen Lamunu, Vivian Nabacwa, Agnes Sanyu, Katherine O Robsky, Joowhan Sung, Alex Kityamuwesi, Achilles Katamba, David W Dowdy\",\"doi\":\"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202404-422OC\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background Undertreatment of tuberculosis (TB) is common in resource-limited settings where same-day microbiological diagnosis is unavailable. We evaluated if a simple clinical risk score for predicting active TB could facilitate treatment initiation among individuals at high risk for TB. Methods We conducted a pragmatic, implementation-effectiveness study in peri-urban primary health clinics in Uganda. Four intervention clinics were paired with standard-of-care comparison clinics. Providers in intervention clinics were trained to use the score and set a threshold score for considering same-day treatment initiation; treatment decisions were at the providers' discretion. Our primary effectiveness outcome was the change in the proportion of individuals with confirmed TB who started on treatment within seven days of presentation, comparing pre-intervention and post-intervention periods. Results Among intervention clinics, 594/720 (83%) people diagnosed with TB started treatment within seven days during the pre-intervention period, versus 264/316 (84%) after implementation (pre-post difference 1%; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: -6, 8%). In comparison clinics, seven-day treatment initiation changed from 312/363 (86%) pre-intervention to 153/211 (73%) post-intervention (pre-post difference -13%; 95%CI: -22, -5%). A difference-in-differences estimate was 14% (95%CI: 10, 19%). In intervention clinics, 1,206 of 1,826 (66%) people presenting with TB symptoms were administered the risk score. 229 (19%) had a score above the treatment threshold and 105 (46%) initiated treatment on the same day. Conclusions An easy-to-use clinical risk score did not increase seven-day empiric treatment initiation in intervention clinics. However, it improved rapid treatment initiation relative to clinics using the prevailing standard-of-care. The score was also highly acceptable to clinical providers. Clinical trial registration available at www.clinicaltrials.gov, ID: __NCT05122624 __________.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the American Thoracic Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the American Thoracic Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202404-422OC\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202404-422OC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在无法获得当日微生物学诊断的资源有限的环境中,结核病治疗不足很常见。我们评估了用于预测活动性结核病的简单临床风险评分是否可以促进结核病高风险个体的治疗启动。方法我们在乌干达城郊初级卫生诊所进行了一项实用的、实施效果的研究。四个干预诊所与标准护理比较诊所配对。干预诊所的提供者接受了使用该评分的培训,并设定了考虑当天开始治疗的阈值评分;治疗决定由提供者自行决定。我们的主要疗效指标是确诊结核病患者在发病后7天内开始接受治疗的比例变化,比较干预前和干预后的时间。结果在干预诊所中,594/720(83%)确诊结核病患者在干预前7天内开始治疗,而实施后为264/316(84%)(前后差异1%;95%置信区间[95% ci]: - 6,8 %)。在比较诊所,7天治疗起始从干预前的312/363(86%)变为干预后的153/211(73%)(前后差异-13%;95%ci: -22, -5%)。差中差估计为14% (95%CI: 10.19%)。在干预诊所,1,826名(66%)出现结核病症状的人中有1,206人接受了风险评分。229例(19%)得分高于治疗阈值,105例(46%)当天开始治疗。结论易于使用的临床风险评分并没有提高干预诊所的7天经验治疗起始率。然而,相对于使用现行护理标准的诊所,它改善了快速开始治疗。该分数也被临床提供者高度接受。临床试验注册可在www.clinicaltrials.gov, ID: __NCT05122624 __________。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness and Implementation of A Clinical Risk Score for Early Diagnosis of Tuberculosis in Uganda: A Pragmatic, Clustered Randomization Clinical Trial.

Background Undertreatment of tuberculosis (TB) is common in resource-limited settings where same-day microbiological diagnosis is unavailable. We evaluated if a simple clinical risk score for predicting active TB could facilitate treatment initiation among individuals at high risk for TB. Methods We conducted a pragmatic, implementation-effectiveness study in peri-urban primary health clinics in Uganda. Four intervention clinics were paired with standard-of-care comparison clinics. Providers in intervention clinics were trained to use the score and set a threshold score for considering same-day treatment initiation; treatment decisions were at the providers' discretion. Our primary effectiveness outcome was the change in the proportion of individuals with confirmed TB who started on treatment within seven days of presentation, comparing pre-intervention and post-intervention periods. Results Among intervention clinics, 594/720 (83%) people diagnosed with TB started treatment within seven days during the pre-intervention period, versus 264/316 (84%) after implementation (pre-post difference 1%; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: -6, 8%). In comparison clinics, seven-day treatment initiation changed from 312/363 (86%) pre-intervention to 153/211 (73%) post-intervention (pre-post difference -13%; 95%CI: -22, -5%). A difference-in-differences estimate was 14% (95%CI: 10, 19%). In intervention clinics, 1,206 of 1,826 (66%) people presenting with TB symptoms were administered the risk score. 229 (19%) had a score above the treatment threshold and 105 (46%) initiated treatment on the same day. Conclusions An easy-to-use clinical risk score did not increase seven-day empiric treatment initiation in intervention clinics. However, it improved rapid treatment initiation relative to clinics using the prevailing standard-of-care. The score was also highly acceptable to clinical providers. Clinical trial registration available at www.clinicaltrials.gov, ID: __NCT05122624 __________.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信