做还是不做?手术治疗对卵巢子宫内膜异位症患者生活质量的影响。

IF 2.3 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Frontiers in global women's health Pub Date : 2025-06-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fgwh.2025.1606768
Emanuela Spagnolo, David Ramiro-Cortijo, Blanca Díaz Fuentes, María Suarez Vega, Lucía Calvillo-Fernández, Ana López, Alicia Hernández
{"title":"做还是不做?手术治疗对卵巢子宫内膜异位症患者生活质量的影响。","authors":"Emanuela Spagnolo, David Ramiro-Cortijo, Blanca Díaz Fuentes, María Suarez Vega, Lucía Calvillo-Fernández, Ana López, Alicia Hernández","doi":"10.3389/fgwh.2025.1606768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endometriosis is a chronic gynecological condition that impacts on women's health, reducing their quality of life. Ovarian endometriosis (OE) and deep endometriosis (DE) are the primary manifestations. While surgical intervention in OE is common, its effects on quality of life remain debated. This study aims to assess global health perception and quality of life in women with OE with and without surgery to inform targeted interventions strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional observational study was conducted at Hospital Universitario La Paz (Spain) and included women aged 25-55 diagnosed with OE, operated (OE-S) or not (OE-NS), as well as those with DE who had surgical resection. Women without endometriosis (control) was also included. Health-related quality of life was measured by SF-36, while pain perception, social support, and endometriosis-specific quality of life were assessed through validated instruments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regarding global health, physical and social functions, emotional role, body pain, and global mental health did not find difference between groups. However, women with DE and OE-NS had significantly lower physical role and global health scores compared to controls. Vitality and physical component scores were lower in DE, while pain sensitivity was higher in OE-NS and DE. Social support perception was reduced in women with OE compared to controls. Quality of life was significantly lower in DE and OE-NS groups, with OE-S showing intermediate scores. Psychological well-being and endometriosis-related support were significantly low across all endometriosis groups. Sexual and occupational functions were higher in OE- S than in OE- NS and DE. Reproductive function was impaired in OE- NS compared to controls, while menstrual characteristics were significantly altered in all endometriosis groups. OE- S exhibited intermediate health and quality of life patterns between control and DE groups, whereas OE- NS was more similar to DE.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Psychological well-being and social support are reduced in all endometriosis groups, but surgical treatment in women with ovarian endometriosis preserve vitality, sexual, and occupational functions. A multidisciplinary approach is essential to improve quality of life in women with endometriosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":73087,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in global women's health","volume":"6 ","pages":"1606768"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12202412/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"To operate or not to operate? The impact of surgical treatment on quality of life in women with ovarian endometriosis.\",\"authors\":\"Emanuela Spagnolo, David Ramiro-Cortijo, Blanca Díaz Fuentes, María Suarez Vega, Lucía Calvillo-Fernández, Ana López, Alicia Hernández\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fgwh.2025.1606768\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endometriosis is a chronic gynecological condition that impacts on women's health, reducing their quality of life. Ovarian endometriosis (OE) and deep endometriosis (DE) are the primary manifestations. While surgical intervention in OE is common, its effects on quality of life remain debated. This study aims to assess global health perception and quality of life in women with OE with and without surgery to inform targeted interventions strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional observational study was conducted at Hospital Universitario La Paz (Spain) and included women aged 25-55 diagnosed with OE, operated (OE-S) or not (OE-NS), as well as those with DE who had surgical resection. Women without endometriosis (control) was also included. Health-related quality of life was measured by SF-36, while pain perception, social support, and endometriosis-specific quality of life were assessed through validated instruments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regarding global health, physical and social functions, emotional role, body pain, and global mental health did not find difference between groups. However, women with DE and OE-NS had significantly lower physical role and global health scores compared to controls. Vitality and physical component scores were lower in DE, while pain sensitivity was higher in OE-NS and DE. Social support perception was reduced in women with OE compared to controls. Quality of life was significantly lower in DE and OE-NS groups, with OE-S showing intermediate scores. Psychological well-being and endometriosis-related support were significantly low across all endometriosis groups. Sexual and occupational functions were higher in OE- S than in OE- NS and DE. Reproductive function was impaired in OE- NS compared to controls, while menstrual characteristics were significantly altered in all endometriosis groups. OE- S exhibited intermediate health and quality of life patterns between control and DE groups, whereas OE- NS was more similar to DE.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Psychological well-being and social support are reduced in all endometriosis groups, but surgical treatment in women with ovarian endometriosis preserve vitality, sexual, and occupational functions. A multidisciplinary approach is essential to improve quality of life in women with endometriosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in global women's health\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"1606768\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12202412/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in global women's health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2025.1606768\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in global women's health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2025.1606768","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:子宫内膜异位症是一种慢性妇科疾病,影响妇女的健康,降低她们的生活质量。卵巢子宫内膜异位症(OE)和深部子宫内膜异位症(DE)是主要表现。虽然OE的手术治疗很常见,但其对生活质量的影响仍存在争议。本研究旨在评估接受和不接受手术的OE女性的整体健康认知和生活质量,为有针对性的干预策略提供信息。方法:本横断面观察性研究在西班牙拉巴斯大学医院进行,纳入25-55岁诊断为OE,手术(OE- s)或未手术(OE- ns)以及手术切除DE的女性。没有子宫内膜异位症的妇女(对照)也包括在内。健康相关的生活质量通过SF-36测量,而疼痛感知、社会支持和子宫内膜异位症特有的生活质量通过验证的仪器进行评估。结果:在整体健康方面,身体和社会功能、情感角色、身体疼痛和整体心理健康在群体之间没有差异。然而,与对照组相比,患有DE和OE-NS的女性的身体功能和整体健康评分明显较低。活力和身体成分得分较低,而OE- ns和DE的疼痛敏感性较高。与对照组相比,OE女性的社会支持感知降低。DE组和OE-NS组的生活质量明显较低,OE-S评分为中等。心理健康和子宫内膜异位症相关支持在所有子宫内膜异位症组中都明显较低。OE- S组的性功能和职业功能高于OE- NS组和DE组,OE- NS组的生殖功能与对照组相比受损,而月经特征在所有子宫内膜异位症组中都有显著改变。子宫内膜异位症患者的健康状况和生活质量在对照组和DE组之间处于中等水平,而OE- NS组与DE组更为相似。结论:所有子宫内膜异位症患者的心理健康状况和社会支持水平均有所下降,但手术治疗后卵巢子宫内膜异位症患者的活力、性功能和职业功能得到了保持。多学科方法对于提高子宫内膜异位症患者的生活质量至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
To operate or not to operate? The impact of surgical treatment on quality of life in women with ovarian endometriosis.

Background: Endometriosis is a chronic gynecological condition that impacts on women's health, reducing their quality of life. Ovarian endometriosis (OE) and deep endometriosis (DE) are the primary manifestations. While surgical intervention in OE is common, its effects on quality of life remain debated. This study aims to assess global health perception and quality of life in women with OE with and without surgery to inform targeted interventions strategies.

Methods: This cross-sectional observational study was conducted at Hospital Universitario La Paz (Spain) and included women aged 25-55 diagnosed with OE, operated (OE-S) or not (OE-NS), as well as those with DE who had surgical resection. Women without endometriosis (control) was also included. Health-related quality of life was measured by SF-36, while pain perception, social support, and endometriosis-specific quality of life were assessed through validated instruments.

Results: Regarding global health, physical and social functions, emotional role, body pain, and global mental health did not find difference between groups. However, women with DE and OE-NS had significantly lower physical role and global health scores compared to controls. Vitality and physical component scores were lower in DE, while pain sensitivity was higher in OE-NS and DE. Social support perception was reduced in women with OE compared to controls. Quality of life was significantly lower in DE and OE-NS groups, with OE-S showing intermediate scores. Psychological well-being and endometriosis-related support were significantly low across all endometriosis groups. Sexual and occupational functions were higher in OE- S than in OE- NS and DE. Reproductive function was impaired in OE- NS compared to controls, while menstrual characteristics were significantly altered in all endometriosis groups. OE- S exhibited intermediate health and quality of life patterns between control and DE groups, whereas OE- NS was more similar to DE.

Conclusion: Psychological well-being and social support are reduced in all endometriosis groups, but surgical treatment in women with ovarian endometriosis preserve vitality, sexual, and occupational functions. A multidisciplinary approach is essential to improve quality of life in women with endometriosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信