我如何在解释肺活量测定的参考方程中教授种族分类。

IF 1.9 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Aaron D Baugh, Nirav R Bhakta, Rosemary Adamson
{"title":"我如何在解释肺活量测定的参考方程中教授种族分类。","authors":"Aaron D Baugh, Nirav R Bhakta, Rosemary Adamson","doi":"10.34197/ats-scholar.2024-0042HT","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Race has been used in medical algorithms, including reference equations for spirometry, following the assumption that race is a biological concept due to the finding that Black American and Asian populations have lower lung function (i.e., forced expiratory volume in 1 second and forced vital capacity) than White populations. Recognizing that race is a social construct and its use in medical algorithms may contribute to health disparities, this practice has been questioned. This inquiry, combined with recent evidence, led the American Thoracic Society to recommend using race-neutral reference equations for spirometry in 2023. In this article, we share our approach to teaching spirometry interpretation, focusing on the factors that determine lung function and the effects of using race-based or race-neutral reference equations. We explicitly define race as a social construct and review the likely reasons for the differences in lung function found between racial groups. We use an interactive and case-based approach to facilitate learning. As part of our interactive approach, we incorporate strategies to enhance psychological safety for the learners. This is particularly important for this topic because discussions of race and health inequities can be contentious and uncomfortable and have the potential to exacerbate the difficulties faced by learners from groups that are underrepresented in medicine. Our approach is intended for a small group of graduate medical learners and could be presented during formal didactic instruction or informally during clinical teaching.</p>","PeriodicalId":72330,"journal":{"name":"ATS scholar","volume":"6 2","pages":"232-251"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12219795/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How I Teach Racial Categorization in Reference Equations Used to Interpret Spirometry.\",\"authors\":\"Aaron D Baugh, Nirav R Bhakta, Rosemary Adamson\",\"doi\":\"10.34197/ats-scholar.2024-0042HT\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Race has been used in medical algorithms, including reference equations for spirometry, following the assumption that race is a biological concept due to the finding that Black American and Asian populations have lower lung function (i.e., forced expiratory volume in 1 second and forced vital capacity) than White populations. Recognizing that race is a social construct and its use in medical algorithms may contribute to health disparities, this practice has been questioned. This inquiry, combined with recent evidence, led the American Thoracic Society to recommend using race-neutral reference equations for spirometry in 2023. In this article, we share our approach to teaching spirometry interpretation, focusing on the factors that determine lung function and the effects of using race-based or race-neutral reference equations. We explicitly define race as a social construct and review the likely reasons for the differences in lung function found between racial groups. We use an interactive and case-based approach to facilitate learning. As part of our interactive approach, we incorporate strategies to enhance psychological safety for the learners. This is particularly important for this topic because discussions of race and health inequities can be contentious and uncomfortable and have the potential to exacerbate the difficulties faced by learners from groups that are underrepresented in medicine. Our approach is intended for a small group of graduate medical learners and could be presented during formal didactic instruction or informally during clinical teaching.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ATS scholar\",\"volume\":\"6 2\",\"pages\":\"232-251\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12219795/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ATS scholar\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34197/ats-scholar.2024-0042HT\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ATS scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34197/ats-scholar.2024-0042HT","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于发现美国黑人和亚洲人口的肺功能(即1秒用力呼气量和用力肺活量)低于白人,因此假设种族是一个生物学概念,种族已被用于医学算法,包括肺活量测定的参考方程。认识到种族是一种社会结构,在医疗算法中使用种族可能会导致健康差异,这种做法受到了质疑。这项调查,结合最近的证据,导致美国胸科学会建议在2023年使用种族中立的参考方程进行肺活量测定。在这篇文章中,我们分享了我们的肺量测定解释教学方法,重点是决定肺功能的因素以及使用基于种族或种族中立的参考方程的影响。我们明确地将种族定义为一种社会结构,并回顾了种族群体之间肺功能差异的可能原因。我们使用互动和基于案例的方法来促进学习。作为我们互动教学方法的一部分,我们结合了增强学习者心理安全的策略。这对于这个主题尤其重要,因为关于种族和健康不平等的讨论可能会引起争议和不舒服,并且有可能加剧来自医学中代表性不足的群体的学习者所面临的困难。我们的方法是为一小群研究生医学学习者设计的,可以在正式的教学指导或非正式的临床教学中提出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How I Teach Racial Categorization in Reference Equations Used to Interpret Spirometry.

Race has been used in medical algorithms, including reference equations for spirometry, following the assumption that race is a biological concept due to the finding that Black American and Asian populations have lower lung function (i.e., forced expiratory volume in 1 second and forced vital capacity) than White populations. Recognizing that race is a social construct and its use in medical algorithms may contribute to health disparities, this practice has been questioned. This inquiry, combined with recent evidence, led the American Thoracic Society to recommend using race-neutral reference equations for spirometry in 2023. In this article, we share our approach to teaching spirometry interpretation, focusing on the factors that determine lung function and the effects of using race-based or race-neutral reference equations. We explicitly define race as a social construct and review the likely reasons for the differences in lung function found between racial groups. We use an interactive and case-based approach to facilitate learning. As part of our interactive approach, we incorporate strategies to enhance psychological safety for the learners. This is particularly important for this topic because discussions of race and health inequities can be contentious and uncomfortable and have the potential to exacerbate the difficulties faced by learners from groups that are underrepresented in medicine. Our approach is intended for a small group of graduate medical learners and could be presented during formal didactic instruction or informally during clinical teaching.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信