{"title":"手稿标题:补充和替代医学(CAM)用于感染预防的监管和影响:来自海湾合作委员会(GCC)国家的见解。","authors":"Farah Kais Alhomoud","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S522405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The growing use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) for infection prevention across Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries raises important concerns regarding patient safety and the lack of evidence-based regulation. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of CAM use, identify associated demographic factors, and explore public perceptions to support healthcare policy development.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional online survey was conducted over a three-month period among GCC residents aged 18 years and older. A self-administered questionnaire was distributed via social media platforms (eg Facebook, WhatsApp, and Twitter) using a convenience sampling approach, supplemented by snowballing. Although the calculated target sample size was 385, a total of 340 participants completed the survey. The questionnaire included items related to demographics, CAM practices, knowledge, and beliefs. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 26, and chi-square tests were used to explore associations between CAM use frequency and participant characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Herbal products (62%) and spiritual healing (14%) emerged as the most commonly used CAM practices, with ginger, Curcuma longa, and garlic being the most frequently used herbs. More frequent CAM use was significantly associated with education level (χ²(3) = 19.01, p <0.001, Cramér's V = 0.160), country of residence (χ²(5) = 35.28, p <0.001, Cramér's V = 0.217), and prior infection experience (χ²(2) = 35.14, p <0.001, Cramér's V = 0.217). Higher usage was reported among Saudis, individuals with higher education, and those previously ill. No significant associations were found with age, health status, or fear of infection. Although 85% of users reported no side effects, reliance on informal sources and limited provider consultation raised safety concerns.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Widespread CAM use highlights the urgent need for regulatory oversight, provider education, and culturally sensitive public health strategies to ensure safe integration into infection prevention efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"2081-2090"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12206891/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Manuscript Title: Regulatory and Implications of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) Use for Infection Prevention: Insights From the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) Countries.\",\"authors\":\"Farah Kais Alhomoud\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/RMHP.S522405\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The growing use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) for infection prevention across Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries raises important concerns regarding patient safety and the lack of evidence-based regulation. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of CAM use, identify associated demographic factors, and explore public perceptions to support healthcare policy development.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional online survey was conducted over a three-month period among GCC residents aged 18 years and older. A self-administered questionnaire was distributed via social media platforms (eg Facebook, WhatsApp, and Twitter) using a convenience sampling approach, supplemented by snowballing. Although the calculated target sample size was 385, a total of 340 participants completed the survey. The questionnaire included items related to demographics, CAM practices, knowledge, and beliefs. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 26, and chi-square tests were used to explore associations between CAM use frequency and participant characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Herbal products (62%) and spiritual healing (14%) emerged as the most commonly used CAM practices, with ginger, Curcuma longa, and garlic being the most frequently used herbs. More frequent CAM use was significantly associated with education level (χ²(3) = 19.01, p <0.001, Cramér's V = 0.160), country of residence (χ²(5) = 35.28, p <0.001, Cramér's V = 0.217), and prior infection experience (χ²(2) = 35.14, p <0.001, Cramér's V = 0.217). Higher usage was reported among Saudis, individuals with higher education, and those previously ill. No significant associations were found with age, health status, or fear of infection. Although 85% of users reported no side effects, reliance on informal sources and limited provider consultation raised safety concerns.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Widespread CAM use highlights the urgent need for regulatory oversight, provider education, and culturally sensitive public health strategies to ensure safe integration into infection prevention efforts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"2081-2090\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12206891/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S522405\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S522405","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:海湾合作委员会(GCC)国家越来越多地使用补充和替代医学(CAM)来预防感染,这引起了对患者安全和缺乏循证监管的重要关注。本研究旨在评估辅助医学使用的流行程度,确定相关的人口因素,并探讨公众的看法,以支持医疗保健政策的制定。患者和方法:对年龄在18岁及以上的GCC居民进行了为期三个月的横断面在线调查。通过社交媒体平台(如Facebook, WhatsApp和Twitter)使用方便的抽样方法分发自我管理的问卷,辅以滚雪球。虽然计算的目标样本量为385,但总共有340名参与者完成了调查。问卷内容包括人口统计、CAM实践、知识和信仰。使用IBM SPSS Statistics version 26对数据进行分析,并采用卡方检验探讨CAM使用频率与参与者特征之间的关系。结果:草药产品(62%)和精神治疗(14%)成为最常用的CAM实践,生姜、姜黄和大蒜是最常用的草药。结论:CAM的广泛使用突出了迫切需要监管监督、提供者教育和文化敏感的公共卫生策略,以确保安全纳入感染预防工作。
Manuscript Title: Regulatory and Implications of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) Use for Infection Prevention: Insights From the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) Countries.
Purpose: The growing use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) for infection prevention across Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries raises important concerns regarding patient safety and the lack of evidence-based regulation. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of CAM use, identify associated demographic factors, and explore public perceptions to support healthcare policy development.
Patients and methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted over a three-month period among GCC residents aged 18 years and older. A self-administered questionnaire was distributed via social media platforms (eg Facebook, WhatsApp, and Twitter) using a convenience sampling approach, supplemented by snowballing. Although the calculated target sample size was 385, a total of 340 participants completed the survey. The questionnaire included items related to demographics, CAM practices, knowledge, and beliefs. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 26, and chi-square tests were used to explore associations between CAM use frequency and participant characteristics.
Results: Herbal products (62%) and spiritual healing (14%) emerged as the most commonly used CAM practices, with ginger, Curcuma longa, and garlic being the most frequently used herbs. More frequent CAM use was significantly associated with education level (χ²(3) = 19.01, p <0.001, Cramér's V = 0.160), country of residence (χ²(5) = 35.28, p <0.001, Cramér's V = 0.217), and prior infection experience (χ²(2) = 35.14, p <0.001, Cramér's V = 0.217). Higher usage was reported among Saudis, individuals with higher education, and those previously ill. No significant associations were found with age, health status, or fear of infection. Although 85% of users reported no side effects, reliance on informal sources and limited provider consultation raised safety concerns.
Conclusion: Widespread CAM use highlights the urgent need for regulatory oversight, provider education, and culturally sensitive public health strategies to ensure safe integration into infection prevention efforts.
期刊介绍:
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include:
Public and community health
Policy and law
Preventative and predictive healthcare
Risk and hazard management
Epidemiology, detection and screening
Lifestyle and diet modification
Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs
Health and safety and occupational health
Healthcare services provision
Health literacy and education
Advertising and promotion of health issues
Health economic evaluations and resource management
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.