Maguy Saffouh El Hajj, Israa Mahdi, Nourhan Mohamed, Nadin Hany Kamel, Alla El Awaisi, Derek Stewart
{"title":"药学专业学生临床推理与决策以发现和解决用药错误。","authors":"Maguy Saffouh El Hajj, Israa Mahdi, Nourhan Mohamed, Nadin Hany Kamel, Alla El Awaisi, Derek Stewart","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Medication errors pose a significant challenge in healthcare, impacting patient safety. Pharmacists play a key role in mitigating errors using clinical reasoning skills. This study examined Qatar University (QU) College of Pharmacy (CPH) students' clinical reasoning and decision-making process in case scenarios involving medication errors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative case study using the think-aloud procedure was conducted with senior fourth-year BSc Pharm and Doctor of Pharmacy students using the clinical reasoning model. Data were analyzed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five interviews were conducted. Eight themes were identified 1) Gaining Initial Patient Impression 2) Assessing Patient Data 3) Difficulty Recalling Therapeutic Knowledge 4) Interpreting Patient Data 5) Synthesizing Facts and Inferences for a Definitive Diagnosis of Errors 6) Describing Desired Outcomes 7) Optimizing Decision-Making 8) Process and Recommendations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>QU pharmacy students used various strategies to detect and resolve medication errors. The think-aloud procedure offered insights into factors influencing clinical reasoning and decision-making, highlighting the importance of future educational interventions to further develop students' skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":" ","pages":"101449"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pharmacy Students' Clinical Reasoning and Decision-Making to Detect and Resolve Medication Errors.\",\"authors\":\"Maguy Saffouh El Hajj, Israa Mahdi, Nourhan Mohamed, Nadin Hany Kamel, Alla El Awaisi, Derek Stewart\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101449\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Medication errors pose a significant challenge in healthcare, impacting patient safety. Pharmacists play a key role in mitigating errors using clinical reasoning skills. This study examined Qatar University (QU) College of Pharmacy (CPH) students' clinical reasoning and decision-making process in case scenarios involving medication errors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative case study using the think-aloud procedure was conducted with senior fourth-year BSc Pharm and Doctor of Pharmacy students using the clinical reasoning model. Data were analyzed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five interviews were conducted. Eight themes were identified 1) Gaining Initial Patient Impression 2) Assessing Patient Data 3) Difficulty Recalling Therapeutic Knowledge 4) Interpreting Patient Data 5) Synthesizing Facts and Inferences for a Definitive Diagnosis of Errors 6) Describing Desired Outcomes 7) Optimizing Decision-Making 8) Process and Recommendations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>QU pharmacy students used various strategies to detect and resolve medication errors. The think-aloud procedure offered insights into factors influencing clinical reasoning and decision-making, highlighting the importance of future educational interventions to further develop students' skills.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"101449\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101449\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101449","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pharmacy Students' Clinical Reasoning and Decision-Making to Detect and Resolve Medication Errors.
Objective: Medication errors pose a significant challenge in healthcare, impacting patient safety. Pharmacists play a key role in mitigating errors using clinical reasoning skills. This study examined Qatar University (QU) College of Pharmacy (CPH) students' clinical reasoning and decision-making process in case scenarios involving medication errors.
Methods: Qualitative case study using the think-aloud procedure was conducted with senior fourth-year BSc Pharm and Doctor of Pharmacy students using the clinical reasoning model. Data were analyzed thematically.
Results: Twenty-five interviews were conducted. Eight themes were identified 1) Gaining Initial Patient Impression 2) Assessing Patient Data 3) Difficulty Recalling Therapeutic Knowledge 4) Interpreting Patient Data 5) Synthesizing Facts and Inferences for a Definitive Diagnosis of Errors 6) Describing Desired Outcomes 7) Optimizing Decision-Making 8) Process and Recommendations.
Conclusion: QU pharmacy students used various strategies to detect and resolve medication errors. The think-aloud procedure offered insights into factors influencing clinical reasoning and decision-making, highlighting the importance of future educational interventions to further develop students' skills.
期刊介绍:
The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors.
After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.