药学专业学生临床推理与决策以发现和解决用药错误。

IF 3.8 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Maguy Saffouh El Hajj, Israa Mahdi, Nourhan Mohamed, Nadin Hany Kamel, Alla El Awaisi, Derek Stewart
{"title":"药学专业学生临床推理与决策以发现和解决用药错误。","authors":"Maguy Saffouh El Hajj, Israa Mahdi, Nourhan Mohamed, Nadin Hany Kamel, Alla El Awaisi, Derek Stewart","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Medication errors pose a significant challenge in healthcare, impacting patient safety. Pharmacists play a key role in mitigating errors using clinical reasoning skills. This study examined Qatar University (QU) College of Pharmacy (CPH) students' clinical reasoning and decision-making process in case scenarios involving medication errors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative case study using the think-aloud procedure was conducted with senior fourth-year BSc Pharm and Doctor of Pharmacy students using the clinical reasoning model. Data were analyzed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five interviews were conducted. Eight themes were identified 1) Gaining Initial Patient Impression 2) Assessing Patient Data 3) Difficulty Recalling Therapeutic Knowledge 4) Interpreting Patient Data 5) Synthesizing Facts and Inferences for a Definitive Diagnosis of Errors 6) Describing Desired Outcomes 7) Optimizing Decision-Making 8) Process and Recommendations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>QU pharmacy students used various strategies to detect and resolve medication errors. The think-aloud procedure offered insights into factors influencing clinical reasoning and decision-making, highlighting the importance of future educational interventions to further develop students' skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":" ","pages":"101449"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pharmacy Students' Clinical Reasoning and Decision-Making to Detect and Resolve Medication Errors.\",\"authors\":\"Maguy Saffouh El Hajj, Israa Mahdi, Nourhan Mohamed, Nadin Hany Kamel, Alla El Awaisi, Derek Stewart\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101449\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Medication errors pose a significant challenge in healthcare, impacting patient safety. Pharmacists play a key role in mitigating errors using clinical reasoning skills. This study examined Qatar University (QU) College of Pharmacy (CPH) students' clinical reasoning and decision-making process in case scenarios involving medication errors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative case study using the think-aloud procedure was conducted with senior fourth-year BSc Pharm and Doctor of Pharmacy students using the clinical reasoning model. Data were analyzed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five interviews were conducted. Eight themes were identified 1) Gaining Initial Patient Impression 2) Assessing Patient Data 3) Difficulty Recalling Therapeutic Knowledge 4) Interpreting Patient Data 5) Synthesizing Facts and Inferences for a Definitive Diagnosis of Errors 6) Describing Desired Outcomes 7) Optimizing Decision-Making 8) Process and Recommendations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>QU pharmacy students used various strategies to detect and resolve medication errors. The think-aloud procedure offered insights into factors influencing clinical reasoning and decision-making, highlighting the importance of future educational interventions to further develop students' skills.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"101449\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101449\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101449","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:药物差错对医疗保健构成重大挑战,影响患者安全。药剂师在使用临床推理技能减轻错误方面发挥着关键作用。本研究考察了卡塔尔大学(QU)药学院(CPH)学生在涉及药物错误的情况下的临床推理和决策过程。方法:采用临床推理模型,采用有声思维方法对药学学士四年级和药学博士四年级学生进行定性案例研究。数据按主题进行分析。结果:共进行了25次访谈。确定了八个主题:1)获得患者的初始印象2)评估患者数据3)回忆治疗知识的困难4)解释患者数据5)综合事实和推断以确定错误诊断6)描述期望结果7)优化决策8)过程和建议。结论:曲区药学专业学生对用药错误的发现和解决策略多种多样。“出声思考”程序提供了对影响临床推理和决策的因素的见解,强调了未来教育干预对进一步发展学生技能的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pharmacy Students' Clinical Reasoning and Decision-Making to Detect and Resolve Medication Errors.

Objective: Medication errors pose a significant challenge in healthcare, impacting patient safety. Pharmacists play a key role in mitigating errors using clinical reasoning skills. This study examined Qatar University (QU) College of Pharmacy (CPH) students' clinical reasoning and decision-making process in case scenarios involving medication errors.

Methods: Qualitative case study using the think-aloud procedure was conducted with senior fourth-year BSc Pharm and Doctor of Pharmacy students using the clinical reasoning model. Data were analyzed thematically.

Results: Twenty-five interviews were conducted. Eight themes were identified 1) Gaining Initial Patient Impression 2) Assessing Patient Data 3) Difficulty Recalling Therapeutic Knowledge 4) Interpreting Patient Data 5) Synthesizing Facts and Inferences for a Definitive Diagnosis of Errors 6) Describing Desired Outcomes 7) Optimizing Decision-Making 8) Process and Recommendations.

Conclusion: QU pharmacy students used various strategies to detect and resolve medication errors. The think-aloud procedure offered insights into factors influencing clinical reasoning and decision-making, highlighting the importance of future educational interventions to further develop students' skills.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
15.20%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors. After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信