前下颌骨种植体成活率的回顾性研究。

IF 1.4 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Su-Yeon Kim, Yu-Lee Kim, Hyun-Jun Kong
{"title":"前下颌骨种植体成活率的回顾性研究。","authors":"Su-Yeon Kim, Yu-Lee Kim, Hyun-Jun Kong","doi":"10.5125/jkaoms.2025.51.3.141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to analyze the survival rate of implants placed in the anterior mandible to evaluate the impact of various prosthetic restoration parameters, including loading protocols, opposing teeth type, prosthesis type, retention type, and cantilever, on implant survival and to evaluate potential risk factors, including systemic disease, associated with implant failure.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>: Here, 604 implants installed in the anterior lower jaws of 326 patients that had at least one follow-up visit after prosthetic restoration were included. Implant failure was defined as removal of the implant from the oral cavity. For survival rate analysis, the survival period was defined from the date of implantation to the date of failure or last examination. Survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify factors affecting implant survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 604 implants placed in the mandibular anterior region, 14 failed, a cumulative survival rate of 97.68%. The survival curve varied according to loading method, with immediate loading demonstrating a significantly lower cumulative survival rate compared to early and conventional loading. Survival curves also differed according to retention type, with screw-retained implants having significantly lower cumulative survival than cement-retained and attachment-retained implants. Cantilevered designs also showed significantly reduced cumulative survival compared to non-cantilevered designs. Conventional loading was significantly less likely to fail compared to immediate loading.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The design of implant-supported prostheses affects the survival of implants placed in the mandibular anterior region. Immediate loading is a risk factor associated with failure of implants in the anterior mandible.</p>","PeriodicalId":51711,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons","volume":"51 3","pages":"141-150"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12223438/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survival rate of dental implants in the anterior mandible: a retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Su-Yeon Kim, Yu-Lee Kim, Hyun-Jun Kong\",\"doi\":\"10.5125/jkaoms.2025.51.3.141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to analyze the survival rate of implants placed in the anterior mandible to evaluate the impact of various prosthetic restoration parameters, including loading protocols, opposing teeth type, prosthesis type, retention type, and cantilever, on implant survival and to evaluate potential risk factors, including systemic disease, associated with implant failure.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>: Here, 604 implants installed in the anterior lower jaws of 326 patients that had at least one follow-up visit after prosthetic restoration were included. Implant failure was defined as removal of the implant from the oral cavity. For survival rate analysis, the survival period was defined from the date of implantation to the date of failure or last examination. Survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify factors affecting implant survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 604 implants placed in the mandibular anterior region, 14 failed, a cumulative survival rate of 97.68%. The survival curve varied according to loading method, with immediate loading demonstrating a significantly lower cumulative survival rate compared to early and conventional loading. Survival curves also differed according to retention type, with screw-retained implants having significantly lower cumulative survival than cement-retained and attachment-retained implants. Cantilevered designs also showed significantly reduced cumulative survival compared to non-cantilevered designs. Conventional loading was significantly less likely to fail compared to immediate loading.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The design of implant-supported prostheses affects the survival of implants placed in the mandibular anterior region. Immediate loading is a risk factor associated with failure of implants in the anterior mandible.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons\",\"volume\":\"51 3\",\"pages\":\"141-150\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12223438/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2025.51.3.141\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2025.51.3.141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是分析放置在前下颌骨的种植体的存活率,以评估各种假体修复参数(包括加载方案、对牙类型、假体类型、固位类型和悬臂)对种植体存活率的影响,并评估与种植体失败相关的潜在危险因素,包括全身性疾病。患者和方法:本研究纳入了326例在假体修复后至少有一次随访的患者在前下颌安装的604个种植体。种植体失败的定义是将种植体从口腔中取出。生存率分析的生存期定义为从植入之日至失败或最后一次检查之日。采用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线进行生存分析。Cox回归分析确定影响种植体存活的因素。结果:下颌前区种植体604例,失败14例,累计成活率97.68%。存活曲线因加载方式而异,与早期和常规加载相比,即时加载显示出明显较低的累积存活率。存活曲线也因固位类型不同而不同,螺钉固位种植体的累积存活明显低于骨水泥固位和附着体固位种植体。与非悬臂设计相比,悬臂设计也显着降低了累积存活率。与即时加载相比,常规加载明显不容易发生故障。结论:种植体支撑型假体的设计影响下颌前区种植体的存活。即刻加载是前下颌种植体失败的一个危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Survival rate of dental implants in the anterior mandible: a retrospective study.

Survival rate of dental implants in the anterior mandible: a retrospective study.

Survival rate of dental implants in the anterior mandible: a retrospective study.

Survival rate of dental implants in the anterior mandible: a retrospective study.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to analyze the survival rate of implants placed in the anterior mandible to evaluate the impact of various prosthetic restoration parameters, including loading protocols, opposing teeth type, prosthesis type, retention type, and cantilever, on implant survival and to evaluate potential risk factors, including systemic disease, associated with implant failure.

Patients and methods: : Here, 604 implants installed in the anterior lower jaws of 326 patients that had at least one follow-up visit after prosthetic restoration were included. Implant failure was defined as removal of the implant from the oral cavity. For survival rate analysis, the survival period was defined from the date of implantation to the date of failure or last examination. Survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify factors affecting implant survival.

Results: Of the 604 implants placed in the mandibular anterior region, 14 failed, a cumulative survival rate of 97.68%. The survival curve varied according to loading method, with immediate loading demonstrating a significantly lower cumulative survival rate compared to early and conventional loading. Survival curves also differed according to retention type, with screw-retained implants having significantly lower cumulative survival than cement-retained and attachment-retained implants. Cantilevered designs also showed significantly reduced cumulative survival compared to non-cantilevered designs. Conventional loading was significantly less likely to fail compared to immediate loading.

Conclusion: The design of implant-supported prostheses affects the survival of implants placed in the mandibular anterior region. Immediate loading is a risk factor associated with failure of implants in the anterior mandible.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg) is the official journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. This bimonthly journal offers high-quality original articles, case series study, case reports, collective or current reviews, technical notes, brief communications or correspondences, and others related to regenerative medicine, dentoalveolar surgery, dental implant surgery, head and neck cancer, aesthetic facial surgery/orthognathic surgery, facial injuries, temporomandibular joint disorders, orofacial disease, and oral pathology. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg is of interest to oral and maxillofacial surgeons and dental practitioners as well as others who are interested in these fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信