基于血栓定位的深度学习脑再灌注自动评分系统的设计与优化。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Arthur Folcher , Jérémy Piters , Daphné Wallach , Gwenael Guillard , Julien Ognard , Jean-Christophe Gentric
{"title":"基于血栓定位的深度学习脑再灌注自动评分系统的设计与优化。","authors":"Arthur Folcher ,&nbsp;Jérémy Piters ,&nbsp;Daphné Wallach ,&nbsp;Gwenael Guillard ,&nbsp;Julien Ognard ,&nbsp;Jean-Christophe Gentric","doi":"10.1016/j.neurad.2025.101366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) scale is widely used to assess angiographic outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy despite significant variability. Our objective was to create and optimize an artificial intelligence (AI)-based classification model for digital subtraction angiography (DSA) TICI scoring.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using a monocentric DSA dataset of thrombectomies, and a platform for medical image analysis, independent readers labeled each series according to TICI score and marked each thrombus. A convolutional neural network (CNN) classification model was created to classify TICI scores, into 2 groups (TICI 0,1 or 2a versus TICI 2b, 2c or 3) and 3 groups (TICI 0,1 or 2a versus TICI 2b versus TICI 2c or 3). The algorithm was first tested alone, and then thrombi positions were introduced to the algorithm by manual placement firstly, then after using a thrombus detection module.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 422 patients were enrolled in the study. 2492 thrombi were annotated on the TICI-labeled series. The model trained on a total of 1609 DSA series. The classification model into two classes had a specificity of 0.97 ± 0.01 and a sensibility of 0.86 ± 0.01. The 3-class models showed insufficient performance, even when combined with the true thrombi positions, with, respectively, F1 scores for TICI 2b classification of 0.50 and 0.55 ± 0.07. The automatic thrombus detection module did not enhance the performance of the 3-class model, with a F1 score for the TICI 2b class measured at 0.50 ± 0.07.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The AI model provided a reproducible 2-class (TICI 0,1 or 2a versus 2b, 2c or 3) classification according to TICI scale. Its performance in distinguishing three classes (TICI 0,1 or 2a versus 2b versus 2c or 3) remains insufficient for clinical practice. Automatic thrombus detection did not improve the model's performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50115,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroradiology","volume":"52 5","pages":"Article 101366"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design and optimization of an automatic deep learning-based cerebral reperfusion scoring (TICI) using thrombus localization\",\"authors\":\"Arthur Folcher ,&nbsp;Jérémy Piters ,&nbsp;Daphné Wallach ,&nbsp;Gwenael Guillard ,&nbsp;Julien Ognard ,&nbsp;Jean-Christophe Gentric\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.neurad.2025.101366\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) scale is widely used to assess angiographic outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy despite significant variability. Our objective was to create and optimize an artificial intelligence (AI)-based classification model for digital subtraction angiography (DSA) TICI scoring.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using a monocentric DSA dataset of thrombectomies, and a platform for medical image analysis, independent readers labeled each series according to TICI score and marked each thrombus. A convolutional neural network (CNN) classification model was created to classify TICI scores, into 2 groups (TICI 0,1 or 2a versus TICI 2b, 2c or 3) and 3 groups (TICI 0,1 or 2a versus TICI 2b versus TICI 2c or 3). The algorithm was first tested alone, and then thrombi positions were introduced to the algorithm by manual placement firstly, then after using a thrombus detection module.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 422 patients were enrolled in the study. 2492 thrombi were annotated on the TICI-labeled series. The model trained on a total of 1609 DSA series. The classification model into two classes had a specificity of 0.97 ± 0.01 and a sensibility of 0.86 ± 0.01. The 3-class models showed insufficient performance, even when combined with the true thrombi positions, with, respectively, F1 scores for TICI 2b classification of 0.50 and 0.55 ± 0.07. The automatic thrombus detection module did not enhance the performance of the 3-class model, with a F1 score for the TICI 2b class measured at 0.50 ± 0.07.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The AI model provided a reproducible 2-class (TICI 0,1 or 2a versus 2b, 2c or 3) classification according to TICI scale. Its performance in distinguishing three classes (TICI 0,1 or 2a versus 2b versus 2c or 3) remains insufficient for clinical practice. Automatic thrombus detection did not improve the model's performance.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50115,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuroradiology\",\"volume\":\"52 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 101366\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0150986125001245\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0150986125001245","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管存在显著差异,但脑梗死溶栓(TICI)量表被广泛用于评估机械取栓的血管造影结果。我们的目标是创建和优化一个基于人工智能(AI)的分类模型,用于数字减影血管造影(DSA) TICI评分。方法:使用单中心取栓DSA数据集和医学图像分析平台,独立阅读器根据TICI评分对每个系列进行标记,并标记每个血栓。建立卷积神经网络(CNN)分类模型,将TICI评分分为2组(TICI 0、1或2a vs TICI 2b、2c或3)和3组(TICI 0、1或2a vs TICI 2b vs TICI 2c或3)。首先对该算法进行单独测试,然后首先通过人工放置将血栓位置引入算法,然后使用血栓检测模块。结果:共纳入422例患者。2492个血栓被标注在tici标记的系列中。该模型总共训练了1609个DSA序列。两类分类模型的特异性为0.97±0.01,敏感性为0.86±0.01。3类模型即使结合血栓的真实位置也表现不佳,TICI 2b的F1分分别为0.50和0.55±0.07。自动血栓检测模块并没有提高3级模型的性能,TICI 2b级的F1评分为0.50±0.07。结论:AI模型根据TICI量表提供了可重复的2级(TICI 0、1或2a与2b、2c或3)分类。其在区分三类(TICI 0,1或2a vs . 2b vs . 2c或3)方面的表现仍不足以用于临床实践。自动检测血栓并没有提高模型的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Design and optimization of an automatic deep learning-based cerebral reperfusion scoring (TICI) using thrombus localization

Design and optimization of an automatic deep learning-based cerebral reperfusion scoring (TICI) using thrombus localization

Background

The Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) scale is widely used to assess angiographic outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy despite significant variability. Our objective was to create and optimize an artificial intelligence (AI)-based classification model for digital subtraction angiography (DSA) TICI scoring.

Methods

Using a monocentric DSA dataset of thrombectomies, and a platform for medical image analysis, independent readers labeled each series according to TICI score and marked each thrombus. A convolutional neural network (CNN) classification model was created to classify TICI scores, into 2 groups (TICI 0,1 or 2a versus TICI 2b, 2c or 3) and 3 groups (TICI 0,1 or 2a versus TICI 2b versus TICI 2c or 3). The algorithm was first tested alone, and then thrombi positions were introduced to the algorithm by manual placement firstly, then after using a thrombus detection module.

Results

A total of 422 patients were enrolled in the study. 2492 thrombi were annotated on the TICI-labeled series. The model trained on a total of 1609 DSA series. The classification model into two classes had a specificity of 0.97 ± 0.01 and a sensibility of 0.86 ± 0.01. The 3-class models showed insufficient performance, even when combined with the true thrombi positions, with, respectively, F1 scores for TICI 2b classification of 0.50 and 0.55 ± 0.07. The automatic thrombus detection module did not enhance the performance of the 3-class model, with a F1 score for the TICI 2b class measured at 0.50 ± 0.07.

Conclusion

The AI model provided a reproducible 2-class (TICI 0,1 or 2a versus 2b, 2c or 3) classification according to TICI scale. Its performance in distinguishing three classes (TICI 0,1 or 2a versus 2b versus 2c or 3) remains insufficient for clinical practice. Automatic thrombus detection did not improve the model's performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroradiology
Journal of Neuroradiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
5.70%
发文量
142
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuroradiology is a peer-reviewed journal, publishing worldwide clinical and basic research in the field of diagnostic and Interventional neuroradiology, translational and molecular neuroimaging, and artificial intelligence in neuroradiology. The Journal of Neuroradiology considers for publication articles, reviews, technical notes and letters to the editors (correspondence section), provided that the methodology and scientific content are of high quality, and that the results will have substantial clinical impact and/or physiological importance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信