Philipp Raßbach, Eric Grießbach, Rouwen Cañal-Bruland, Oliver Herbort
{"title":"同时运动偏差体现选择的身体相关效应。","authors":"Philipp Raßbach, Eric Grießbach, Rouwen Cañal-Bruland, Oliver Herbort","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Human decision making often involves making a choice while concurrently moving. Prior studies showed that the dynamic body state biases choices, with deciders opting for choices associated with lower motor effort (motor cost bias) and spatial overlap with concurrent movement (cognitive crosstalk bias). In this study, we examined whether bodily movements (e.g., moving a limb) or resulting visual movements in the environment (e.g., a ball rolling in a specific direction due to the limb movement) give rise to the cognitive crosstalk bias. In a virtual embodied choice task, participants manually tracked a stimulus and concurrently made decisions to evade an obstacle and collect rewards. In two experiments, we orthogonally manipulated the motor costs for choices and spatial features of the body state during tracking. Importantly, we disentangled bodily movements during tracking and resulting visual movements on the computer screen to assess their relative contributions to the cognitive crosstalk bias. Both motor costs and cognitive crosstalk biased participants' choices. Cognitive crosstalk specifically was determined solely by the bodily movement direction in both experiments. This result pattern could not be attenuated by increasing the saliency of visual tracking movements on the computer screen in the second experiment. Our results suggest that bodily movements primarily cause cognitive crosstalk during embodied choices. These findings have implications for embodied choice models and dual-tasking research, as they show a potential divergence between findings from classical dual-task paradigms and more dynamic embodied choices that are influenced by motor costs and cognitive crosstalk resulting from the moving body. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50195,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Body-related effects of concurrent movement bias embodied choices.\",\"authors\":\"Philipp Raßbach, Eric Grießbach, Rouwen Cañal-Bruland, Oliver Herbort\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/xhp0001346\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Human decision making often involves making a choice while concurrently moving. Prior studies showed that the dynamic body state biases choices, with deciders opting for choices associated with lower motor effort (motor cost bias) and spatial overlap with concurrent movement (cognitive crosstalk bias). In this study, we examined whether bodily movements (e.g., moving a limb) or resulting visual movements in the environment (e.g., a ball rolling in a specific direction due to the limb movement) give rise to the cognitive crosstalk bias. In a virtual embodied choice task, participants manually tracked a stimulus and concurrently made decisions to evade an obstacle and collect rewards. In two experiments, we orthogonally manipulated the motor costs for choices and spatial features of the body state during tracking. Importantly, we disentangled bodily movements during tracking and resulting visual movements on the computer screen to assess their relative contributions to the cognitive crosstalk bias. Both motor costs and cognitive crosstalk biased participants' choices. Cognitive crosstalk specifically was determined solely by the bodily movement direction in both experiments. This result pattern could not be attenuated by increasing the saliency of visual tracking movements on the computer screen in the second experiment. Our results suggest that bodily movements primarily cause cognitive crosstalk during embodied choices. These findings have implications for embodied choice models and dual-tasking research, as they show a potential divergence between findings from classical dual-task paradigms and more dynamic embodied choices that are influenced by motor costs and cognitive crosstalk resulting from the moving body. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001346\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001346","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
人类的决策通常涉及在移动的同时做出选择。先前的研究表明,动态身体状态会对选择产生偏倚,决策者会选择与较低运动努力相关的选择(运动成本偏见)和与并发运动相关的空间重叠(认知串扰偏见)。在这项研究中,我们研究了身体运动(例如,移动肢体)或在环境中产生的视觉运动(例如,由于肢体运动而向特定方向滚动的球)是否会引起认知相声偏见。在虚拟具体化选择任务中,参与者手动跟踪刺激,同时做出回避障碍和获得奖励的决定。在两个实验中,我们在跟踪过程中对选择和身体状态的空间特征的运动成本进行正交操纵。重要的是,我们解开了追踪过程中的身体运动和由此在计算机屏幕上产生的视觉运动的纠缠,以评估它们对认知相声偏见的相对贡献。运动成本和认知相声都会影响参与者的选择。在两个实验中,认知相声仅由身体运动方向决定。在第二个实验中,通过增加视觉跟踪运动在计算机屏幕上的显著性,不能减弱这一结果模式。我们的研究结果表明,在具体化的选择过程中,身体运动主要引起认知相声。这些发现对具身选择模型和双任务研究具有启示意义,因为它们显示了经典双任务范式的研究结果与受运动成本和由运动身体产生的认知串扰影响的更动态的具身选择之间的潜在分歧。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
Body-related effects of concurrent movement bias embodied choices.
Human decision making often involves making a choice while concurrently moving. Prior studies showed that the dynamic body state biases choices, with deciders opting for choices associated with lower motor effort (motor cost bias) and spatial overlap with concurrent movement (cognitive crosstalk bias). In this study, we examined whether bodily movements (e.g., moving a limb) or resulting visual movements in the environment (e.g., a ball rolling in a specific direction due to the limb movement) give rise to the cognitive crosstalk bias. In a virtual embodied choice task, participants manually tracked a stimulus and concurrently made decisions to evade an obstacle and collect rewards. In two experiments, we orthogonally manipulated the motor costs for choices and spatial features of the body state during tracking. Importantly, we disentangled bodily movements during tracking and resulting visual movements on the computer screen to assess their relative contributions to the cognitive crosstalk bias. Both motor costs and cognitive crosstalk biased participants' choices. Cognitive crosstalk specifically was determined solely by the bodily movement direction in both experiments. This result pattern could not be attenuated by increasing the saliency of visual tracking movements on the computer screen in the second experiment. Our results suggest that bodily movements primarily cause cognitive crosstalk during embodied choices. These findings have implications for embodied choice models and dual-tasking research, as they show a potential divergence between findings from classical dual-task paradigms and more dynamic embodied choices that are influenced by motor costs and cognitive crosstalk resulting from the moving body. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance publishes studies on perception, control of action, perceptual aspects of language processing, and related cognitive processes.