脊髓硬膜外电刺激对脊髓损伤后下肢运动功能恢复的初步研究。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
H S Chhabra, K K V Kalidindi, N Garg, A Sharma, B Chhibber, H Kumar, G Vishwakarma, M Gupta, M R Bhat
{"title":"脊髓硬膜外电刺激对脊髓损伤后下肢运动功能恢复的初步研究。","authors":"H S Chhabra, K K V Kalidindi, N Garg, A Sharma, B Chhibber, H Kumar, G Vishwakarma, M Gupta, M R Bhat","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2025.2517935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Single-arm prospective pilot study.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the safety and efficacy of sEES in the recovery of motor function after severe SCI in the Indian population and to evaluate the feasibility of a larger study.</p><p><strong>Overview of literature: </strong>Standing and walking are highly desirable goals for persons with spinal cord injury (SCI). Activity-based locomotor training is the only available practice to enhance recovery at present. However, it does not yield significant outcomes in individuals with severe spinal cord injury. In recent years, Spinal epidural electrical stimulation (sEES) has been reported to produce rhythmic motor activity in limbs in a few case reports and also in clinical trials in animals and more recently, in a few human case reports.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-arm prospective pilot study at a tertiary care spine surgery center in five subjects with chronic spinal cord injury with an absence of useful power in lower limbs and satisfying the eligibility criteria. The Institute Ethics Committee and the Research Review Committee approved the study and it was registered with the Clinical Trials Registry of India.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No intraoperative or early postoperative complications were noted in any of the subjects. Two subjects had wound complications at 1 and 3 months, respectively and were managed successfully. All of these participants were unable to stand, step, or walk without assistance before the recruitment. With epidural stimulation, four subjects gained better control of standing full weight bearing (without assistance). Four (<u>80%</u>) subjects were able to coordinate stepping on a treadmill and three (60%) were able to walk without knee braces with epidural stimulation. Objective functional outcome measures such as the Walking Index of spinal cord injury and Spinal Cord Independence Measure showed significant improvement (P = 0.004 and 0.002, respectively) with sEES. The trial could be implemented successfully, <i>i.e.</i> the desired recruitment could be achieved within a defined period, with procedural adherence and participant compliance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>sEES is a safe intervention. Locomotor training with sEES improves the motor abilities and functional recovery of persons with chronic SCI. A larger prospective study with more subjects needs to be done to draw a definite conclusion and seems to be feasible using the protocol, outcome measures, and recruitment strategy of the pilot study.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spinal epidural electrical stimulation for the recovery of motor function in lower limbs after spinal cord injury: A pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"H S Chhabra, K K V Kalidindi, N Garg, A Sharma, B Chhibber, H Kumar, G Vishwakarma, M Gupta, M R Bhat\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10790268.2025.2517935\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Single-arm prospective pilot study.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the safety and efficacy of sEES in the recovery of motor function after severe SCI in the Indian population and to evaluate the feasibility of a larger study.</p><p><strong>Overview of literature: </strong>Standing and walking are highly desirable goals for persons with spinal cord injury (SCI). Activity-based locomotor training is the only available practice to enhance recovery at present. However, it does not yield significant outcomes in individuals with severe spinal cord injury. In recent years, Spinal epidural electrical stimulation (sEES) has been reported to produce rhythmic motor activity in limbs in a few case reports and also in clinical trials in animals and more recently, in a few human case reports.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-arm prospective pilot study at a tertiary care spine surgery center in five subjects with chronic spinal cord injury with an absence of useful power in lower limbs and satisfying the eligibility criteria. The Institute Ethics Committee and the Research Review Committee approved the study and it was registered with the Clinical Trials Registry of India.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No intraoperative or early postoperative complications were noted in any of the subjects. Two subjects had wound complications at 1 and 3 months, respectively and were managed successfully. All of these participants were unable to stand, step, or walk without assistance before the recruitment. With epidural stimulation, four subjects gained better control of standing full weight bearing (without assistance). Four (<u>80%</u>) subjects were able to coordinate stepping on a treadmill and three (60%) were able to walk without knee braces with epidural stimulation. Objective functional outcome measures such as the Walking Index of spinal cord injury and Spinal Cord Independence Measure showed significant improvement (P = 0.004 and 0.002, respectively) with sEES. The trial could be implemented successfully, <i>i.e.</i> the desired recruitment could be achieved within a defined period, with procedural adherence and participant compliance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>sEES is a safe intervention. Locomotor training with sEES improves the motor abilities and functional recovery of persons with chronic SCI. A larger prospective study with more subjects needs to be done to draw a definite conclusion and seems to be feasible using the protocol, outcome measures, and recruitment strategy of the pilot study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2025.2517935\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2025.2517935","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计:单臂前瞻性先导研究。目的:评估在印度重度脊髓损伤患者中应用脑电刺激疗法恢复运动功能的安全性和有效性,并评估开展更大规模研究的可行性。文献综述:站立和行走是脊髓损伤(SCI)患者非常理想的目标。以活动为基础的运动训练是目前唯一有效的增强恢复的方法。然而,在严重脊髓损伤的个体中,它并没有产生显著的结果。近年来,据报道,脊髓硬膜外电刺激(sEES)在一些病例报告和动物临床试验中,以及最近的一些人类病例报告中,在肢体中产生有节奏的运动活动。方法:我们在一家三级脊柱外科中心进行了一项单臂前瞻性先导研究,研究对象为5例慢性脊髓损伤,下肢无力,符合入选标准。研究所伦理委员会和研究审查委员会批准了这项研究,并在印度临床试验登记处注册。结果:所有患者均无术中及术后早期并发症。两名患者分别在1个月和3个月出现伤口并发症,并成功处理。在招募之前,所有这些参与者都无法站立、行走或没有帮助。通过硬膜外刺激,4名受试者获得了更好的站立完全负重控制(无辅助)。4名(80%)受试者能够在跑步机上协调行走,3名(60%)受试者能够在没有硬膜外刺激的情况下行走。客观功能指标,如脊髓损伤步行指数和脊髓独立性测量显示,使用sEES显著改善(P分别为0.004和0.002)。试验可以成功地实施,即可以在规定的时间内实现所需的招募,并遵守程序和参与者遵守规定。结论:see是一种安全的干预措施。运动训练可以改善慢性脊髓损伤患者的运动能力和功能恢复。需要进行更大规模的前瞻性研究,包括更多的受试者,以得出明确的结论,并且使用试点研究的方案、结果测量和招募策略似乎是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Spinal epidural electrical stimulation for the recovery of motor function in lower limbs after spinal cord injury: A pilot study.

Study design: Single-arm prospective pilot study.

Purpose: To assess the safety and efficacy of sEES in the recovery of motor function after severe SCI in the Indian population and to evaluate the feasibility of a larger study.

Overview of literature: Standing and walking are highly desirable goals for persons with spinal cord injury (SCI). Activity-based locomotor training is the only available practice to enhance recovery at present. However, it does not yield significant outcomes in individuals with severe spinal cord injury. In recent years, Spinal epidural electrical stimulation (sEES) has been reported to produce rhythmic motor activity in limbs in a few case reports and also in clinical trials in animals and more recently, in a few human case reports.

Methods: We conducted a single-arm prospective pilot study at a tertiary care spine surgery center in five subjects with chronic spinal cord injury with an absence of useful power in lower limbs and satisfying the eligibility criteria. The Institute Ethics Committee and the Research Review Committee approved the study and it was registered with the Clinical Trials Registry of India.

Results: No intraoperative or early postoperative complications were noted in any of the subjects. Two subjects had wound complications at 1 and 3 months, respectively and were managed successfully. All of these participants were unable to stand, step, or walk without assistance before the recruitment. With epidural stimulation, four subjects gained better control of standing full weight bearing (without assistance). Four (80%) subjects were able to coordinate stepping on a treadmill and three (60%) were able to walk without knee braces with epidural stimulation. Objective functional outcome measures such as the Walking Index of spinal cord injury and Spinal Cord Independence Measure showed significant improvement (P = 0.004 and 0.002, respectively) with sEES. The trial could be implemented successfully, i.e. the desired recruitment could be achieved within a defined period, with procedural adherence and participant compliance.

Conclusions: sEES is a safe intervention. Locomotor training with sEES improves the motor abilities and functional recovery of persons with chronic SCI. A larger prospective study with more subjects needs to be done to draw a definite conclusion and seems to be feasible using the protocol, outcome measures, and recruitment strategy of the pilot study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信