{"title":"探索使用智能手机测量声级差作为治疗结果的可行性。","authors":"Calvin Peter Baker, Anna Miles","doi":"10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In the last decade, acoustic voice analysis using smartphones and freely downloadable apps has gained popularity. This observational study aimed to establish the feasibility of using uncalibrated smartphone devices with internal microphones as sound-level meters (SLMs) of voice in suboptimal clinical environments with ambient noise for sound-level difference measurement.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Four smartphones (two iPhones and two Androids) were tested against a Class 2 Casella SLM. Within-device consistency and linearity were tested across a range of synthesized tones and recorded sustained /a/ vowels, adjusting for app choice, microphone-to-source distance, sound type, intensity, frequency, and ambient noise level (< 30, < 50 dB). The strength of within-device test-retest reliability was also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across devices, single dB values differed widely. Under all conditions, a strong linear relationship was seen across the Class 2 SLM and all smartphones (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> > .980). An increase in ambient noise from < 30 to < 50 dB did not affect the linearity of any of the tested devices (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> > .980). The test-retest reliability showed near-perfect linearity across measurement iterations and between devices, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> > .998, τ > .99. Measured differences between white noise tokens across all devices showed good agreement, intraclass correlation coefficient (2,1) = .88.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Provided that internal linearity can be proven, uncalibrated smartphones demonstrate a feasible method of measuring pre-/posttreatment sound levels in sustained vowels provided that the device microphone-to-source distance and recording parameters (i.e., time and frequency weighting and application) are the same. Conversely, for absolute sound pressure level measurement, calibration with a gold standard SLM is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":49240,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"2342-2350"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the Feasibility of Using Smartphones for Measuring Sound-Level Difference as a Treatment Outcome.\",\"authors\":\"Calvin Peter Baker, Anna Miles\",\"doi\":\"10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00538\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In the last decade, acoustic voice analysis using smartphones and freely downloadable apps has gained popularity. This observational study aimed to establish the feasibility of using uncalibrated smartphone devices with internal microphones as sound-level meters (SLMs) of voice in suboptimal clinical environments with ambient noise for sound-level difference measurement.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Four smartphones (two iPhones and two Androids) were tested against a Class 2 Casella SLM. Within-device consistency and linearity were tested across a range of synthesized tones and recorded sustained /a/ vowels, adjusting for app choice, microphone-to-source distance, sound type, intensity, frequency, and ambient noise level (< 30, < 50 dB). The strength of within-device test-retest reliability was also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across devices, single dB values differed widely. Under all conditions, a strong linear relationship was seen across the Class 2 SLM and all smartphones (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> > .980). An increase in ambient noise from < 30 to < 50 dB did not affect the linearity of any of the tested devices (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> > .980). The test-retest reliability showed near-perfect linearity across measurement iterations and between devices, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> > .998, τ > .99. Measured differences between white noise tokens across all devices showed good agreement, intraclass correlation coefficient (2,1) = .88.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Provided that internal linearity can be proven, uncalibrated smartphones demonstrate a feasible method of measuring pre-/posttreatment sound levels in sustained vowels provided that the device microphone-to-source distance and recording parameters (i.e., time and frequency weighting and application) are the same. Conversely, for absolute sound pressure level measurement, calibration with a gold standard SLM is needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2342-2350\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00538\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00538","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exploring the Feasibility of Using Smartphones for Measuring Sound-Level Difference as a Treatment Outcome.
Purpose: In the last decade, acoustic voice analysis using smartphones and freely downloadable apps has gained popularity. This observational study aimed to establish the feasibility of using uncalibrated smartphone devices with internal microphones as sound-level meters (SLMs) of voice in suboptimal clinical environments with ambient noise for sound-level difference measurement.
Method: Four smartphones (two iPhones and two Androids) were tested against a Class 2 Casella SLM. Within-device consistency and linearity were tested across a range of synthesized tones and recorded sustained /a/ vowels, adjusting for app choice, microphone-to-source distance, sound type, intensity, frequency, and ambient noise level (< 30, < 50 dB). The strength of within-device test-retest reliability was also assessed.
Results: Across devices, single dB values differed widely. Under all conditions, a strong linear relationship was seen across the Class 2 SLM and all smartphones (R2 > .980). An increase in ambient noise from < 30 to < 50 dB did not affect the linearity of any of the tested devices (R2 > .980). The test-retest reliability showed near-perfect linearity across measurement iterations and between devices, R2 > .998, τ > .99. Measured differences between white noise tokens across all devices showed good agreement, intraclass correlation coefficient (2,1) = .88.
Conclusions: Provided that internal linearity can be proven, uncalibrated smartphones demonstrate a feasible method of measuring pre-/posttreatment sound levels in sustained vowels provided that the device microphone-to-source distance and recording parameters (i.e., time and frequency weighting and application) are the same. Conversely, for absolute sound pressure level measurement, calibration with a gold standard SLM is needed.
期刊介绍:
Mission: AJSLP publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles on all aspects of clinical practice in speech-language pathology. The journal is an international outlet for clinical research pertaining to screening, detection, diagnosis, management, and outcomes of communication and swallowing disorders across the lifespan as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. Because of its clinical orientation, the journal disseminates research findings applicable to diverse aspects of clinical practice in speech-language pathology. AJSLP seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work.
Scope: The broad field of speech-language pathology, including aphasia; apraxia of speech and childhood apraxia of speech; aural rehabilitation; augmentative and alternative communication; cognitive impairment; craniofacial disorders; dysarthria; fluency disorders; language disorders in children; speech sound disorders; swallowing, dysphagia, and feeding disorders; and voice disorders.