桡骨远端骨折作为行动的号召:通过早期骨质疏松治疗降低随后的脆性骨折风险。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-06-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/21514593251351180
Chenée Armando, Edward J Fox, Kenneth F Taylor
{"title":"桡骨远端骨折作为行动的号召:通过早期骨质疏松治疗降低随后的脆性骨折风险。","authors":"Chenée Armando, Edward J Fox, Kenneth F Taylor","doi":"10.1177/21514593251351180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Distal radius fractures (DRF) often serve as the initial indication of bone mineral disease. This study aims to determine the extent to which the risk of subsequent fragility fractures can be reduced by initiating anti-osteoporotic therapy after initial presentation of a DRF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study utilized TriNetX, an online database with de-identified patient data from 79 US healthcare organizations. Females above the age of 50 were categorized based on receiving initial anti-osteoporotic treatment within a year of the DRF. Group characteristics, antiosteoporosis medications, and bone density evaluations were analyzed. After propensity matching, the risk of subsequent DRF, hip and vertebral fractures, as well as incidence of additional DEXA scans from 2004 to 2024 was explored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Medication (M) group (n = 6709) had a mean age of 69, the No Medication (NM) group (n = 181,065) had a mean age of 65 at the index incidence. Baseline differences included higher rates of bone density disorders, inflammatory polyarthropathies, spondylopathies, metabolic disorders, obesity, malnutrition, and neoplasm in the M group. Notably, 43% of the M group had a prior DEXA scan compared to 8.7% of the NM group. The most prescribed anti-osteoporotic medication in the M group was Alendronate (49%). After propensity matching (n = 6627), the M group had 32% more DEXA scans and were 25% less likely to have a subsequent DRF fracture compared to the NM group. There was no difference between groups in combined intertrochanteric and femoral neck fractures. Vertebral compression fractures demonstrated a small but statistically significant increase in the M group, with an absolute risk difference of 0.8% (number needed to treat = 125) and an effect size (Cohen's h = 0.079), suggesting limited clinical relevance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Timely assessment and medical intervention can prevent future DRF. However, post-DRF bone density evaluations remain infrequent. This study highlights the hand surgeon's role in identifying osteoporosis. Level of Evidence: Level III Cohort Study.</p>","PeriodicalId":48568,"journal":{"name":"Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation","volume":"16 ","pages":"21514593251351180"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12202905/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distal Radius Fractures as a Call to Action: Reducing Subsequent Fragility Fracture Risk Through Early Osteoporosis Therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Chenée Armando, Edward J Fox, Kenneth F Taylor\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21514593251351180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Distal radius fractures (DRF) often serve as the initial indication of bone mineral disease. This study aims to determine the extent to which the risk of subsequent fragility fractures can be reduced by initiating anti-osteoporotic therapy after initial presentation of a DRF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study utilized TriNetX, an online database with de-identified patient data from 79 US healthcare organizations. Females above the age of 50 were categorized based on receiving initial anti-osteoporotic treatment within a year of the DRF. Group characteristics, antiosteoporosis medications, and bone density evaluations were analyzed. After propensity matching, the risk of subsequent DRF, hip and vertebral fractures, as well as incidence of additional DEXA scans from 2004 to 2024 was explored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Medication (M) group (n = 6709) had a mean age of 69, the No Medication (NM) group (n = 181,065) had a mean age of 65 at the index incidence. Baseline differences included higher rates of bone density disorders, inflammatory polyarthropathies, spondylopathies, metabolic disorders, obesity, malnutrition, and neoplasm in the M group. Notably, 43% of the M group had a prior DEXA scan compared to 8.7% of the NM group. The most prescribed anti-osteoporotic medication in the M group was Alendronate (49%). After propensity matching (n = 6627), the M group had 32% more DEXA scans and were 25% less likely to have a subsequent DRF fracture compared to the NM group. There was no difference between groups in combined intertrochanteric and femoral neck fractures. Vertebral compression fractures demonstrated a small but statistically significant increase in the M group, with an absolute risk difference of 0.8% (number needed to treat = 125) and an effect size (Cohen's h = 0.079), suggesting limited clinical relevance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Timely assessment and medical intervention can prevent future DRF. However, post-DRF bone density evaluations remain infrequent. This study highlights the hand surgeon's role in identifying osteoporosis. Level of Evidence: Level III Cohort Study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"21514593251351180\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12202905/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21514593251351180\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21514593251351180","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:桡骨远端骨折(DRF)常作为骨矿物质疾病的初始指征。本研究旨在确定在首次出现DRF后,通过开始抗骨质疏松治疗,可在多大程度上降低随后脆性骨折的风险。方法:本研究利用TriNetX,这是一个在线数据库,其中包含来自79家美国医疗机构的未识别患者数据。50岁以上的女性根据在DRF后一年内接受的初始抗骨质疏松治疗进行分类。分析各组特征、抗骨质疏松药物和骨密度评估。在倾向匹配之后,研究人员探讨了2004年至2024年期间发生DRF、髋部和椎体骨折的风险,以及额外DEXA扫描的发生率。结果:用药(M)组(n = 6709)的平均年龄为69岁,未用药(NM)组(n = 181,065)的平均年龄为65岁。基线差异包括M组较高的骨密度紊乱、炎症性多关节病、脊柱病、代谢紊乱、肥胖、营养不良和肿瘤发生率。值得注意的是,43%的M组患者进行了DEXA扫描,而NM组的这一比例为8.7%。M组使用最多的抗骨质疏松药物是阿仑膦酸钠(49%)。倾向匹配(n = 6627)后,与NM组相比,M组的DEXA扫描次数增加32%,随后发生DRF骨折的可能性降低25%。股骨粗隆间和股骨颈合并骨折两组间无差异。M组椎体压缩性骨折发生率虽小但有统计学意义,绝对风险差异为0.8%(需要治疗的人数= 125),效应大小(Cohen’s h = 0.079),提示临床相关性有限。结论:及时评估和医疗干预可预防未来DRF的发生。然而,drf后的骨密度评估仍然很少。这项研究强调了手外科医生在识别骨质疏松症中的作用。证据等级:III级队列研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Distal Radius Fractures as a Call to Action: Reducing Subsequent Fragility Fracture Risk Through Early Osteoporosis Therapy.

Purpose: Distal radius fractures (DRF) often serve as the initial indication of bone mineral disease. This study aims to determine the extent to which the risk of subsequent fragility fractures can be reduced by initiating anti-osteoporotic therapy after initial presentation of a DRF.

Methods: This study utilized TriNetX, an online database with de-identified patient data from 79 US healthcare organizations. Females above the age of 50 were categorized based on receiving initial anti-osteoporotic treatment within a year of the DRF. Group characteristics, antiosteoporosis medications, and bone density evaluations were analyzed. After propensity matching, the risk of subsequent DRF, hip and vertebral fractures, as well as incidence of additional DEXA scans from 2004 to 2024 was explored.

Results: The Medication (M) group (n = 6709) had a mean age of 69, the No Medication (NM) group (n = 181,065) had a mean age of 65 at the index incidence. Baseline differences included higher rates of bone density disorders, inflammatory polyarthropathies, spondylopathies, metabolic disorders, obesity, malnutrition, and neoplasm in the M group. Notably, 43% of the M group had a prior DEXA scan compared to 8.7% of the NM group. The most prescribed anti-osteoporotic medication in the M group was Alendronate (49%). After propensity matching (n = 6627), the M group had 32% more DEXA scans and were 25% less likely to have a subsequent DRF fracture compared to the NM group. There was no difference between groups in combined intertrochanteric and femoral neck fractures. Vertebral compression fractures demonstrated a small but statistically significant increase in the M group, with an absolute risk difference of 0.8% (number needed to treat = 125) and an effect size (Cohen's h = 0.079), suggesting limited clinical relevance.

Conclusions: Timely assessment and medical intervention can prevent future DRF. However, post-DRF bone density evaluations remain infrequent. This study highlights the hand surgeon's role in identifying osteoporosis. Level of Evidence: Level III Cohort Study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation (GOS) is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that provides clinical information concerning musculoskeletal conditions affecting the aging population. GOS focuses on care of geriatric orthopaedic patients and their subsequent rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信