历史与哲学语境:在语境中理解古代哲学。

IF 0.1 4区 社会学 Q4 HISTORY
Orna Harari
{"title":"历史与哲学语境:在语境中理解古代哲学。","authors":"Orna Harari","doi":"10.1163/19552343-14234071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Through an examination of Eduard Zeller's and Michael Frede's historiographical approaches, I question the assumption that by placing philosophy in its historical context we can avoid anachronism. I argue that an exegetical approach that studies texts and places the discussions found therein in their philosophical contexts can minimize anachronism and offer a historically sensitive understanding. I clarify this claim through three case studies: the relation between John Philoponus' philosophy and theology, Aristotle's account of relatives, and Alexander of Aphrodisias' notion of mixture. In so doing, I distinguish contextualization that facilitates judgment from contextualization that facilitates understanding and show how the latter furthers our understanding of philosophical views in different ways.</p>","PeriodicalId":41264,"journal":{"name":"Revue de Synthese","volume":"146 1-2","pages":"176-201"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Historical Versus Philosophical Context: Understanding Ancient Philosophy in Its Contexts.\",\"authors\":\"Orna Harari\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/19552343-14234071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Through an examination of Eduard Zeller's and Michael Frede's historiographical approaches, I question the assumption that by placing philosophy in its historical context we can avoid anachronism. I argue that an exegetical approach that studies texts and places the discussions found therein in their philosophical contexts can minimize anachronism and offer a historically sensitive understanding. I clarify this claim through three case studies: the relation between John Philoponus' philosophy and theology, Aristotle's account of relatives, and Alexander of Aphrodisias' notion of mixture. In so doing, I distinguish contextualization that facilitates judgment from contextualization that facilitates understanding and show how the latter furthers our understanding of philosophical views in different ways.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":41264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revue de Synthese\",\"volume\":\"146 1-2\",\"pages\":\"176-201\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revue de Synthese\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/19552343-14234071\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue de Synthese","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/19552343-14234071","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过对爱德华·泽勒(edward Zeller)和迈克尔·弗雷德(Michael Frede)的史学方法的考察,我质疑这样一种假设,即通过将哲学置于其历史背景中,我们可以避免时代错误。我认为,一种研究文本并将其中的讨论置于其哲学背景中的训诂方法可以最大限度地减少时代错误,并提供历史敏感的理解。我通过三个案例研究来澄清这一观点:约翰·菲洛波诺斯的哲学与神学之间的关系,亚里士多德对亲属的描述,以及阿佛洛狄西亚斯的亚历山大的混合概念。通过这样做,我区分了促进判断的语境化和促进理解的语境化,并展示了后者如何以不同的方式促进我们对哲学观点的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Historical Versus Philosophical Context: Understanding Ancient Philosophy in Its Contexts.

Through an examination of Eduard Zeller's and Michael Frede's historiographical approaches, I question the assumption that by placing philosophy in its historical context we can avoid anachronism. I argue that an exegetical approach that studies texts and places the discussions found therein in their philosophical contexts can minimize anachronism and offer a historically sensitive understanding. I clarify this claim through three case studies: the relation between John Philoponus' philosophy and theology, Aristotle's account of relatives, and Alexander of Aphrodisias' notion of mixture. In so doing, I distinguish contextualization that facilitates judgment from contextualization that facilitates understanding and show how the latter furthers our understanding of philosophical views in different ways.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revue de Synthese
Revue de Synthese Multiple-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
50.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Créée par Henri Berr en 1900, La revue de synthèse, grâce au concours de nombreux universitaires français et étrangers, accueille des travaux d"histoire intellectuelle, d"épistémologie, de philosophie, de sociologie, d"histoire économique, sociale et culturelle. Elle a la vocation d"animer les réflexions situées au carrefour entre la philosophie, l"histoire des sciences et l"histoire générale en encourageant les recherches et les échanges sur les questions touchant aux fondements des sciences sociales, aux renouvellements de l"enquête sur les sciences, aux développements des voies nouvelles propres à l"histoire intellectuelle.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信