秸秆还田与施肥配比对冬小麦土壤微生物数量、化学计量特征及微生物熵的影响

Q2 Environmental Science
Jian-Heng Song, Jing-Yu Huang, Xin-Yu Guo, Jia-Jie Song, Yu-Ming Huang, Chen-Yu Wang, Yong-Zhong Feng, Guang-Xin Ren, Xing Wang
{"title":"秸秆还田与施肥配比对冬小麦土壤微生物数量、化学计量特征及微生物熵的影响","authors":"Jian-Heng Song, Jing-Yu Huang, Xin-Yu Guo, Jia-Jie Song, Yu-Ming Huang, Chen-Yu Wang, Yong-Zhong Feng, Guang-Xin Ren, Xing Wang","doi":"10.13227/j.hjkx.202405157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In order to investigate the effects of the interaction between straw return and chemical fertilizer on soil microbial activity, microbial biomass (SMB), soil microbial entropy (qmb), and soil-microbial stoichiometric imbalance in agricultural soil so as to realize the stabilization of soil and increase the production of fertilizers, the experiment was carried out in a two-factor split-area design, with the primary treatments of straw return (W1) and straw non-return (W0) and the secondary treatments of no fertilizer, nitrogen fertilizer (N) and nitrogen-phosphorus fertilizer (NP), and nitrogen-phosphorus fertilizer (NP), to investigate the characteristics of soil-microbial carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus changes and the coupling relationship between stoichiometric characteristics, stoichiometric imbalance, and microbial entropy under different treatments. The results showed that the soil organic carbon (SOC) content of W1NP was significantly increased compared with that of W0 (<i>P</i>&lt;0.05), the soil total nitrogen (TN) content of W1NP was increased by 56.56% compared with that of W0, there was no significant difference in the soil TP content (<i>P</i>&gt;0.05), and the C/P was significantly increased in the W1NP treatment compared with that in W0 (<i>P</i>&lt;0.05). The soil microbial carbon (MBC), soil microbial nitrogen (MBN), and soil microbial phosphorus (MBP) contents were significantly higher (<i>P</i>&lt;0.05) compared to those of W0. Soil MBN content was significantly higher in all treatments of straw return compared to that of W0 (<i>P</i>&lt;0.05). The difference in soil MBP content between the W0NP and W1NP treatments was not significant (<i>P</i>&gt;0.05), but both were significantly higher than those of the other treatments (<i>P</i>&lt;0.05), and MBN/MBP was significantly higher than that of W0 in all treatments (<i>P</i>&lt;0.05). Application of phosphorus fertilizer significantly increased qmbc, qmbn, and qmbp (<i>P</i>&lt;0.05), and the carbon and phosphorus imbalance ratios (C/P<sub>imb</sub>) of the W1 and W0 treatments were not significantly different (<i>P</i>&gt;0.05) but were significantly higher than in the other treatments (<i>P</i>&lt;0.05). The nitrogen phosphorus imbalance ratio (N/P<sub>imb</sub>) was significantly lower (<i>P</i>&lt;0.05) in all treatments compared to that in W0. Correlation analysis showed that there was a significant positive correlation between MBC, MBN, and MBP (<i>P</i>&lt;0.05) and all were significantly negatively correlated with stoichiometric imbalance (<i>P</i>&lt;0.05). Redundancy analysis showed that the closest relationship was between MBC/MBP and qmbc, a significant relationship was between MBN/MBP and microbial mass entropy phosphorus, and the closest relationship was between microbial mass entropy nitrogen and MBN/MBP (<i>P</i>&lt;0.05). In conclusion, the straw return with the nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer (W1NP) treatment was optimal for improving soil nutrients and changing soil stoichiometric characteristics, as well as increasing soil fertility.</p>","PeriodicalId":35937,"journal":{"name":"环境科学","volume":"46 6","pages":"3957-3964"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Influence of Straw Return and Fertilizer Matching on Microbial Quantity and Stoichiometric Characteristics and Microbial Entropy of Winter Wheat Soils].\",\"authors\":\"Jian-Heng Song, Jing-Yu Huang, Xin-Yu Guo, Jia-Jie Song, Yu-Ming Huang, Chen-Yu Wang, Yong-Zhong Feng, Guang-Xin Ren, Xing Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.13227/j.hjkx.202405157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In order to investigate the effects of the interaction between straw return and chemical fertilizer on soil microbial activity, microbial biomass (SMB), soil microbial entropy (qmb), and soil-microbial stoichiometric imbalance in agricultural soil so as to realize the stabilization of soil and increase the production of fertilizers, the experiment was carried out in a two-factor split-area design, with the primary treatments of straw return (W1) and straw non-return (W0) and the secondary treatments of no fertilizer, nitrogen fertilizer (N) and nitrogen-phosphorus fertilizer (NP), and nitrogen-phosphorus fertilizer (NP), to investigate the characteristics of soil-microbial carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus changes and the coupling relationship between stoichiometric characteristics, stoichiometric imbalance, and microbial entropy under different treatments. The results showed that the soil organic carbon (SOC) content of W1NP was significantly increased compared with that of W0 (<i>P</i>&lt;0.05), the soil total nitrogen (TN) content of W1NP was increased by 56.56% compared with that of W0, there was no significant difference in the soil TP content (<i>P</i>&gt;0.05), and the C/P was significantly increased in the W1NP treatment compared with that in W0 (<i>P</i>&lt;0.05). The soil microbial carbon (MBC), soil microbial nitrogen (MBN), and soil microbial phosphorus (MBP) contents were significantly higher (<i>P</i>&lt;0.05) compared to those of W0. Soil MBN content was significantly higher in all treatments of straw return compared to that of W0 (<i>P</i>&lt;0.05). The difference in soil MBP content between the W0NP and W1NP treatments was not significant (<i>P</i>&gt;0.05), but both were significantly higher than those of the other treatments (<i>P</i>&lt;0.05), and MBN/MBP was significantly higher than that of W0 in all treatments (<i>P</i>&lt;0.05). Application of phosphorus fertilizer significantly increased qmbc, qmbn, and qmbp (<i>P</i>&lt;0.05), and the carbon and phosphorus imbalance ratios (C/P<sub>imb</sub>) of the W1 and W0 treatments were not significantly different (<i>P</i>&gt;0.05) but were significantly higher than in the other treatments (<i>P</i>&lt;0.05). The nitrogen phosphorus imbalance ratio (N/P<sub>imb</sub>) was significantly lower (<i>P</i>&lt;0.05) in all treatments compared to that in W0. Correlation analysis showed that there was a significant positive correlation between MBC, MBN, and MBP (<i>P</i>&lt;0.05) and all were significantly negatively correlated with stoichiometric imbalance (<i>P</i>&lt;0.05). Redundancy analysis showed that the closest relationship was between MBC/MBP and qmbc, a significant relationship was between MBN/MBP and microbial mass entropy phosphorus, and the closest relationship was between microbial mass entropy nitrogen and MBN/MBP (<i>P</i>&lt;0.05). In conclusion, the straw return with the nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer (W1NP) treatment was optimal for improving soil nutrients and changing soil stoichiometric characteristics, as well as increasing soil fertility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"环境科学\",\"volume\":\"46 6\",\"pages\":\"3957-3964\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"环境科学\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202405157\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202405157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了研究秸秆还田与化肥交互作用对农业土壤微生物活性、微生物生物量(SMB)、土壤微生物熵(qmb)和土壤微生物化学计量失衡的影响,从而实现土壤的稳定和肥料的增产,采用双因素裂区设计进行试验。以秸秆还田(W1)和秸秆不还田(W0)为一级处理,不施肥、氮肥(N)和氮磷肥(NP)、氮磷肥(NP)为二级处理,研究不同处理下土壤-微生物碳、氮、磷的变化特征以及化学计量特征、化学计量失衡与微生物熵之间的耦合关系。结果表明:与W0相比,W1NP处理土壤有机碳(SOC)含量显著提高(P<0.05),土壤全氮(TN)含量较W0提高56.56%,土壤全磷(TP)含量差异不显著(P>0.05),碳磷比显著提高(P<0.05)。土壤微生物碳(MBC)、微生物氮(MBN)和微生物磷(MBP)含量显著高于W0 (p < 0.05)。秸秆还田各处理土壤MBN含量均显著高于W0处理(p < 0.05)。W0NP与W1NP处理土壤MBP含量差异不显著(P>0.05),但均显著高于其他处理(P>0.05),且MBN/MBP均显著高于W0处理(P<0.05)。施用磷肥显著提高了qmbc、qmbn和qmbp (P<0.05), W1和W0处理的碳磷失衡比(C/Pimb)差异不显著(P>0.05),但显著高于其他处理(P<0.05)。各处理氮磷失衡比(N/Pimb)均显著低于W0处理(p < 0.05)。相关分析显示,MBC、MBN、MBP三者之间呈显著正相关(P<0.05),且均与化学计量失衡呈显著负相关(P<0.05)。冗余分析表明,MBC/MBP与qmbc关系最密切,MBN/MBP与微生物质量熵磷关系显著,微生物质量熵氮与MBN/MBP关系最密切(P<0.05)。综上所述,秸秆还田配氮磷肥(W1NP)处理最有利于改善土壤养分,改变土壤化学计量特征,提高土壤肥力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Influence of Straw Return and Fertilizer Matching on Microbial Quantity and Stoichiometric Characteristics and Microbial Entropy of Winter Wheat Soils].

In order to investigate the effects of the interaction between straw return and chemical fertilizer on soil microbial activity, microbial biomass (SMB), soil microbial entropy (qmb), and soil-microbial stoichiometric imbalance in agricultural soil so as to realize the stabilization of soil and increase the production of fertilizers, the experiment was carried out in a two-factor split-area design, with the primary treatments of straw return (W1) and straw non-return (W0) and the secondary treatments of no fertilizer, nitrogen fertilizer (N) and nitrogen-phosphorus fertilizer (NP), and nitrogen-phosphorus fertilizer (NP), to investigate the characteristics of soil-microbial carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus changes and the coupling relationship between stoichiometric characteristics, stoichiometric imbalance, and microbial entropy under different treatments. The results showed that the soil organic carbon (SOC) content of W1NP was significantly increased compared with that of W0 (P<0.05), the soil total nitrogen (TN) content of W1NP was increased by 56.56% compared with that of W0, there was no significant difference in the soil TP content (P>0.05), and the C/P was significantly increased in the W1NP treatment compared with that in W0 (P<0.05). The soil microbial carbon (MBC), soil microbial nitrogen (MBN), and soil microbial phosphorus (MBP) contents were significantly higher (P<0.05) compared to those of W0. Soil MBN content was significantly higher in all treatments of straw return compared to that of W0 (P<0.05). The difference in soil MBP content between the W0NP and W1NP treatments was not significant (P>0.05), but both were significantly higher than those of the other treatments (P<0.05), and MBN/MBP was significantly higher than that of W0 in all treatments (P<0.05). Application of phosphorus fertilizer significantly increased qmbc, qmbn, and qmbp (P<0.05), and the carbon and phosphorus imbalance ratios (C/Pimb) of the W1 and W0 treatments were not significantly different (P>0.05) but were significantly higher than in the other treatments (P<0.05). The nitrogen phosphorus imbalance ratio (N/Pimb) was significantly lower (P<0.05) in all treatments compared to that in W0. Correlation analysis showed that there was a significant positive correlation between MBC, MBN, and MBP (P<0.05) and all were significantly negatively correlated with stoichiometric imbalance (P<0.05). Redundancy analysis showed that the closest relationship was between MBC/MBP and qmbc, a significant relationship was between MBN/MBP and microbial mass entropy phosphorus, and the closest relationship was between microbial mass entropy nitrogen and MBN/MBP (P<0.05). In conclusion, the straw return with the nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer (W1NP) treatment was optimal for improving soil nutrients and changing soil stoichiometric characteristics, as well as increasing soil fertility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
环境科学
环境科学 Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15329
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信