[中国环境法规对电力行业二氧化碳排放的影响]。

Q2 Environmental Science
Ya-Li Zheng, Wei Shi, Wei-Juan Wang, Ping Wang
{"title":"[中国环境法规对电力行业二氧化碳排放的影响]。","authors":"Ya-Li Zheng, Wei Shi, Wei-Juan Wang, Ping Wang","doi":"10.13227/j.hjkx.202404110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from the power sector are the main source of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in China, and environmental regulation plays an irreplaceable role as a basic constraint for reducing carbon emissions. Based on China's provincial panel data from 2003-2019, this study analyzes the spatio-temporal characteristics of different types of environmental regulatory intensity and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from the power sector by using kernel density estimation and standard deviation ellipses. Then, the geographically and temporally weighted regression model is constructed to explore the impacts of command-based, market-based, and voluntary environmental regulations on CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in the power industry. The results showed the following: ① For different types of environmental regulation: in time, the market-based environmental regulation kernel density curves showed a \"rightward\" motion, with interregional differences expanding, while command-based and voluntary environmental regulation showed a shrinking interregional difference; in space, command-based environmental regulation gradually followed a northwest-southeast spatial distribution pattern. Market-based and voluntary environmental regulation all showed a northeast-southwest spatial distribution pattern. ② For CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from the power sector: in time, kernel density curves showed a \"rightward\" motion, with inter-regional differences expanding; in space, there was a gradual pattern of northwest-southeast spatial distribution pattern, and the center of gravity was moving to the northwest. ③ The impact of different types of environmental regulations on CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in the power sector had obvious spatial and temporal heterogeneity. In time, the regression coefficient of command-based environmental regulation in most provinces (cities, autonomous regions) had an increasing and subsequently declining trend, while market-based and voluntary environmental regulation decreased first and then increased. In space, spatial heterogeneity in the role of the three types of environmental regulation was evident; command-based environmental regulation gradually had a greater impact on the northern provinces (facilitation), market-based environmental regulation had a greater impact on the central-eastern provinces (facilitation), and voluntary environmental regulation had a greater impact on the eastern provinces (disincentive).</p>","PeriodicalId":35937,"journal":{"name":"环境科学","volume":"46 6","pages":"3496-3508"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Impact of China's Environmental Regulations on CO<sub>2</sub> Emissions in the Power Sector].\",\"authors\":\"Ya-Li Zheng, Wei Shi, Wei-Juan Wang, Ping Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.13227/j.hjkx.202404110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from the power sector are the main source of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in China, and environmental regulation plays an irreplaceable role as a basic constraint for reducing carbon emissions. Based on China's provincial panel data from 2003-2019, this study analyzes the spatio-temporal characteristics of different types of environmental regulatory intensity and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from the power sector by using kernel density estimation and standard deviation ellipses. Then, the geographically and temporally weighted regression model is constructed to explore the impacts of command-based, market-based, and voluntary environmental regulations on CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in the power industry. The results showed the following: ① For different types of environmental regulation: in time, the market-based environmental regulation kernel density curves showed a \\\"rightward\\\" motion, with interregional differences expanding, while command-based and voluntary environmental regulation showed a shrinking interregional difference; in space, command-based environmental regulation gradually followed a northwest-southeast spatial distribution pattern. Market-based and voluntary environmental regulation all showed a northeast-southwest spatial distribution pattern. ② For CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from the power sector: in time, kernel density curves showed a \\\"rightward\\\" motion, with inter-regional differences expanding; in space, there was a gradual pattern of northwest-southeast spatial distribution pattern, and the center of gravity was moving to the northwest. ③ The impact of different types of environmental regulations on CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in the power sector had obvious spatial and temporal heterogeneity. In time, the regression coefficient of command-based environmental regulation in most provinces (cities, autonomous regions) had an increasing and subsequently declining trend, while market-based and voluntary environmental regulation decreased first and then increased. In space, spatial heterogeneity in the role of the three types of environmental regulation was evident; command-based environmental regulation gradually had a greater impact on the northern provinces (facilitation), market-based environmental regulation had a greater impact on the central-eastern provinces (facilitation), and voluntary environmental regulation had a greater impact on the eastern provinces (disincentive).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"环境科学\",\"volume\":\"46 6\",\"pages\":\"3496-3508\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"环境科学\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202404110\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202404110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

电力行业的二氧化碳排放是中国二氧化碳排放的主要来源,环境监管作为减少碳排放的基本约束,具有不可替代的作用。基于2003-2019年中国省级面板数据,采用核密度估计和标准差椭圆分析了电力行业不同类型环境监管强度和CO2排放的时空特征。然后,构建地理和时间加权回归模型,探讨命令型、市场化和自愿性环境法规对电力行业二氧化碳排放的影响。结果表明:①对于不同类型的环境规制,在时间上,市场环境规制核密度曲线呈“右向”运动,区域间差异扩大,而命令型和自愿性环境规制核密度曲线区域间差异缩小;在空间上,命令型环境规制核密度曲线逐渐呈现西北—东南的空间分布格局。市场化和自愿性环境规制均呈现东北-西南空间分布格局。②电力行业CO2排放:在时间上,核密度曲线呈“右向”运动,区域间差异扩大;在空间上,核密度曲线呈西北—东南渐变的空间分布格局,重心向西北移动。③不同类型环境规制对电力行业CO2排放的影响具有明显的时空异质性。从时间上看,绝大多数省(市、区)命令型环境规制的回归系数均呈现先上升后下降的趋势,而市场化和自愿性环境规制的回归系数则呈现先下降后上升的趋势。在空间上,三种环境规制作用的空间异质性明显,指令性环境规制对北部省份的影响逐渐增大(促进),市场化环境规制对中东部省份的影响逐渐增大(促进),自愿性环境规制对东部省份的影响逐渐增大(抑制)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Impact of China's Environmental Regulations on CO2 Emissions in the Power Sector].

CO2 emissions from the power sector are the main source of CO2 emissions in China, and environmental regulation plays an irreplaceable role as a basic constraint for reducing carbon emissions. Based on China's provincial panel data from 2003-2019, this study analyzes the spatio-temporal characteristics of different types of environmental regulatory intensity and CO2 emissions from the power sector by using kernel density estimation and standard deviation ellipses. Then, the geographically and temporally weighted regression model is constructed to explore the impacts of command-based, market-based, and voluntary environmental regulations on CO2 emissions in the power industry. The results showed the following: ① For different types of environmental regulation: in time, the market-based environmental regulation kernel density curves showed a "rightward" motion, with interregional differences expanding, while command-based and voluntary environmental regulation showed a shrinking interregional difference; in space, command-based environmental regulation gradually followed a northwest-southeast spatial distribution pattern. Market-based and voluntary environmental regulation all showed a northeast-southwest spatial distribution pattern. ② For CO2 emissions from the power sector: in time, kernel density curves showed a "rightward" motion, with inter-regional differences expanding; in space, there was a gradual pattern of northwest-southeast spatial distribution pattern, and the center of gravity was moving to the northwest. ③ The impact of different types of environmental regulations on CO2 emissions in the power sector had obvious spatial and temporal heterogeneity. In time, the regression coefficient of command-based environmental regulation in most provinces (cities, autonomous regions) had an increasing and subsequently declining trend, while market-based and voluntary environmental regulation decreased first and then increased. In space, spatial heterogeneity in the role of the three types of environmental regulation was evident; command-based environmental regulation gradually had a greater impact on the northern provinces (facilitation), market-based environmental regulation had a greater impact on the central-eastern provinces (facilitation), and voluntary environmental regulation had a greater impact on the eastern provinces (disincentive).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
环境科学
环境科学 Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15329
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信