加强肠道准备对结肠镜息肉切除术后并发症和预后的影响。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Yan-Ping Ma, Xue-Yong Zheng, Xin-Feng Shen, Yi-Ting Ling, Mei-Ping Qian, Min-Jun Ni
{"title":"加强肠道准备对结肠镜息肉切除术后并发症和预后的影响。","authors":"Yan-Ping Ma, Xue-Yong Zheng, Xin-Feng Shen, Yi-Ting Ling, Mei-Ping Qian, Min-Jun Ni","doi":"10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.106264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colonoscopic polypectomy is a crucial procedure for the prevention and treatment of colorectal cancer, with its success and safety largely dependent on the quality of bowel preparation. Currently, polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution remains the standard method for bowel preparation, but its use may cause patient discomfort and incomplete cleansing.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate impact of enhanced and conventional bowel preparation protocols on the outcomes of colonoscopic polypectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study collected data from 130 patients who underwent colonoscopic polypectomy between March 2023 and June 2024. Patients were divided into the conventional bowel preparation group (<i>n</i> = 65) and enhanced bowel preparation group (<i>n</i> = 65). Primary outcome measures included Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) scores, procedure-related parameters, complication rates, and prognosis. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25.0, with <i>P</i> < 0.05 indicating statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The enhanced group demonstrated significant advantages over the conventional group, with higher BBPS total scores (4.2 ± 0.7 <i>vs</i> 3.1 ± 0.8, <i>P</i> < 0.001), higher one-time complete resection rates (95.4% <i>vs</i> 83.1%, <i>P</i> = 0.01), shorter operative times (23.1 ± 4.8 <i>vs</i> 25.4 ± 5.2 min, <i>P</i> = 0.03), and lesser intraoperative blood loss (18.2 ± 4.5 <i>vs</i> 20.3 ± 5.1 mL, <i>P</i> = 0.04). Total complication rates were significantly lower (5.9% <i>vs</i> 16.9%, <i>P</i> = 0.05), particularly for bleeding (1.5% <i>vs</i> 16.9%, <i>P</i> = 0.01) and infection (1.5% <i>vs</i> 7.7%, <i>P</i> = 0.04). The enhanced group also showed lower 6-month recurrence rates (3.1% <i>vs</i> 10.8%, <i>P</i> = 0.05) and higher patient satisfaction (87.7% <i>vs</i> 76.9%, <i>P</i> = 0.04) than did the conventional group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The enhanced bowel preparation protocol demonstrates significant advantages, particularly in improving surgical outcomes, reducing complications, and increasing patient satisfaction, underscoring its importance of its application during colonoscopic polypectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":23759,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"17 6","pages":"106264"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12188597/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of enhanced bowel preparation on complications and prognosis following colonoscopic polypectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Yan-Ping Ma, Xue-Yong Zheng, Xin-Feng Shen, Yi-Ting Ling, Mei-Ping Qian, Min-Jun Ni\",\"doi\":\"10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.106264\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colonoscopic polypectomy is a crucial procedure for the prevention and treatment of colorectal cancer, with its success and safety largely dependent on the quality of bowel preparation. Currently, polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution remains the standard method for bowel preparation, but its use may cause patient discomfort and incomplete cleansing.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate impact of enhanced and conventional bowel preparation protocols on the outcomes of colonoscopic polypectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study collected data from 130 patients who underwent colonoscopic polypectomy between March 2023 and June 2024. Patients were divided into the conventional bowel preparation group (<i>n</i> = 65) and enhanced bowel preparation group (<i>n</i> = 65). Primary outcome measures included Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) scores, procedure-related parameters, complication rates, and prognosis. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25.0, with <i>P</i> < 0.05 indicating statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The enhanced group demonstrated significant advantages over the conventional group, with higher BBPS total scores (4.2 ± 0.7 <i>vs</i> 3.1 ± 0.8, <i>P</i> < 0.001), higher one-time complete resection rates (95.4% <i>vs</i> 83.1%, <i>P</i> = 0.01), shorter operative times (23.1 ± 4.8 <i>vs</i> 25.4 ± 5.2 min, <i>P</i> = 0.03), and lesser intraoperative blood loss (18.2 ± 4.5 <i>vs</i> 20.3 ± 5.1 mL, <i>P</i> = 0.04). Total complication rates were significantly lower (5.9% <i>vs</i> 16.9%, <i>P</i> = 0.05), particularly for bleeding (1.5% <i>vs</i> 16.9%, <i>P</i> = 0.01) and infection (1.5% <i>vs</i> 7.7%, <i>P</i> = 0.04). The enhanced group also showed lower 6-month recurrence rates (3.1% <i>vs</i> 10.8%, <i>P</i> = 0.05) and higher patient satisfaction (87.7% <i>vs</i> 76.9%, <i>P</i> = 0.04) than did the conventional group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The enhanced bowel preparation protocol demonstrates significant advantages, particularly in improving surgical outcomes, reducing complications, and increasing patient satisfaction, underscoring its importance of its application during colonoscopic polypectomy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"volume\":\"17 6\",\"pages\":\"106264\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12188597/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.106264\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.106264","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:结肠镜下息肉切除术是预防和治疗结直肠癌的重要手术,其成功和安全性很大程度上取决于肠道准备的质量。目前,聚乙二醇电解质溶液仍然是肠道准备的标准方法,但其使用可能会导致患者不适和不完全清洁。目的:评价强化肠准备方案和常规肠准备方案对结肠镜息肉切除术结果的影响。方法:这项回顾性队列研究收集了2023年3月至2024年6月期间接受结肠镜息肉切除术的130例患者的数据。患者分为常规肠准备组(n = 65)和强化肠准备组(n = 65)。主要结局指标包括波士顿肠准备量表(BBPS)评分、手术相关参数、并发症发生率和预后。采用SPSS 25.0版本进行统计学分析,P < 0.05为有统计学意义。结果:强化组BBPS总分高于常规组(4.2±0.7 vs 3.1±0.8,P < 0.001),一次性完全切除率高于常规组(95.4% vs 83.1%, P = 0.01),手术时间短(23.1±4.8 vs 25.4±5.2 min, P = 0.03),术中出血量少(18.2±4.5 vs 20.3±5.1 mL, P = 0.04)。总并发症发生率明显降低(5.9% vs 16.9%, P = 0.05),特别是出血(1.5% vs 16.9%, P = 0.01)和感染(1.5% vs 7.7%, P = 0.04)。强化组6个月复发率(3.1% vs 10.8%, P = 0.05)低于常规组,患者满意度(87.7% vs 76.9%, P = 0.04)高于常规组。结论:强化肠准备方案在改善手术结果、减少并发症和提高患者满意度方面具有显著优势,在结肠镜息肉切除术中应用具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of enhanced bowel preparation on complications and prognosis following colonoscopic polypectomy.

Background: Colonoscopic polypectomy is a crucial procedure for the prevention and treatment of colorectal cancer, with its success and safety largely dependent on the quality of bowel preparation. Currently, polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution remains the standard method for bowel preparation, but its use may cause patient discomfort and incomplete cleansing.

Aim: To evaluate impact of enhanced and conventional bowel preparation protocols on the outcomes of colonoscopic polypectomy.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study collected data from 130 patients who underwent colonoscopic polypectomy between March 2023 and June 2024. Patients were divided into the conventional bowel preparation group (n = 65) and enhanced bowel preparation group (n = 65). Primary outcome measures included Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) scores, procedure-related parameters, complication rates, and prognosis. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25.0, with P < 0.05 indicating statistical significance.

Results: The enhanced group demonstrated significant advantages over the conventional group, with higher BBPS total scores (4.2 ± 0.7 vs 3.1 ± 0.8, P < 0.001), higher one-time complete resection rates (95.4% vs 83.1%, P = 0.01), shorter operative times (23.1 ± 4.8 vs 25.4 ± 5.2 min, P = 0.03), and lesser intraoperative blood loss (18.2 ± 4.5 vs 20.3 ± 5.1 mL, P = 0.04). Total complication rates were significantly lower (5.9% vs 16.9%, P = 0.05), particularly for bleeding (1.5% vs 16.9%, P = 0.01) and infection (1.5% vs 7.7%, P = 0.04). The enhanced group also showed lower 6-month recurrence rates (3.1% vs 10.8%, P = 0.05) and higher patient satisfaction (87.7% vs 76.9%, P = 0.04) than did the conventional group.

Conclusion: The enhanced bowel preparation protocol demonstrates significant advantages, particularly in improving surgical outcomes, reducing complications, and increasing patient satisfaction, underscoring its importance of its application during colonoscopic polypectomy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
111
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信